Afleveringen
-
Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunicke in Washington during Event 201
When you, like I have been keeping an eye on the news and real events related to the corona pandemic during the past three years, you will encounter many strange coincidences. Amongst which is the (then) Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunickeâs visit to Washington and his meeting with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation occuring on exactly the same day as Event 201 took place. On the day, Magnus Heunicke posted a picture on Facebook showing him sitting in the Danish Embassy in Washington preparing for a meeting with the foundation. You can read about Event 201 and that it was televised to several locations outside New York, including Washington, where the simulation or table-top exercise took place. Despite this, Magnus Heunicke vehemently proclaims on social media that âhe did not take part in Event 201â.
Since then, as you might expect, he has deleted his post on Facebook. It seems completely unlikely that the Danish Health Minister was in Washington to meet the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on the same day as their greatly planned pandemic simulation took place and that he did not take part in the exercise, or at least observed it or had a briefing about it. It appears completely illogical doesnât it? Of course it does! However, there were many other important things on the agenda. Regardless of whether we argue over whether Heunicke took part in Event 201 or not, we do know that Bill Gates has a lot of interests invested in the Danish Health Sector. Indeed, it is worthy of further scrutiny to analyse his Foundation's âinvestmentsâ and âdonationsâ in Denmark in the coming chapter; but before that let us jump ahead in time to another âpandemic simulation exerciseâ, like Event 201, as a similar exercise took place in 2022.
Catastrophic Contagion
Both the BMGF and the JHU must have found Event 201 such a great successâwhich we must admit it was, as they, by and large, accurately predicted a pandemic, which arrived only very shortly after. So wonderfully pleased with the outcome, like children let loose with the sweet-jar, they planned another table-top exercise in 2022. A shuffle around with the âorganisersâ revealed that, in the prime seats was found to be the WHO who replaced the WEF, and thus they embarked upon the simulation, which they named âCatastrophic Contagion.â This was rolled out on 23rd October 2022. However, the scenario was staged sometime in the future, namely in 2025. There were not as many planned deaths as in the previous exercise as this time the main focus was upon the children dropping dead during the staged pandemic. Akin to Event 201, the fictional scenario was again a pandemic.
In the simulation of this event, they estimated that there would be one billion infected and twenty million dead, of which fifteen million were children, and of the masses surviving the disease would have caused brain damage or paralysis anyway. The most successful countries to come out of the simulation were those who have invested in a preparation and rescue plan to meet the catastrophe. The simulation involved rescue and response units, which were ready constantly to counter the ensuing pandemic and which had regularly rehearsed their plans. The conclusion of the exercise was crystal clear: If only more countries had taken part in building a preparation and rescue operation..., it would not have looked as bad for them as the scripted scenario. (This is hard selling on steroids..) The organisers invited fourteen participants to carry out the table-top exercise making use of fictitious news casts and status reports. Among the participants was Bill Gates himself, together with a pot-pourri of different health experts and retired African health ministers and various vice health ministers. A video published by the organisers gave a three-minute summary of the exercise.
This time we must really hope that the WHO, BMGF and JHU are not nearly as good at predicting future world events as WEF, BMGF and JHU were in Event 201 in 2019, so that this horrible, threatening but ultimately completely fictitious scenario will not be reproduced in reality. Much points at the world population being much more wised-up and that the WHO, BMGF and JHU are no longer able to conjure up the same spell on people, who are by now, hopefully much more sceptical of the restrictions, much of which were ignored in the UK, although not reported elsewhere! Furthermore, people are now much more sceptical towards the emergency-approved vaccines which are by now causing untold side-effects and deaths, and the ability of the pharmaceutical companies to profit on such âpandemicsâ. When we get closer to 2025 and this new pandemic may appear, in whatever form it will take, we will see how much of a lesson the world's population has learned. I wonder if, by that time, people will at last understand that they are just mere pawns in the games of the globalists?
If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):
Links:
* The organisers behind Catastrophic Contagionâs homepage for the table-top excercise: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/index.html
* The organisers behind Catastrophic Contagion used this informing short video in their table-top excercise:
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
The fortune teller Ida Auken about owning nothing and being happy
The WEF's connections to Denmark are manifold. Pretty well all the Danish prime ministers in recent times have been affiliated with the WEF and both the then Crown Prince, now King Frederik 10. and his wife Queen Mary, have long been part of the âYoung Global Leadersâ programme of the WEF. Despite the posh competition it is still the bilderberger Ida Auken, who admittedly ranks as the greatest advocate for the WEF in Denmark. She wrote - allegedly herself - an article in 2016, which was published on the WEF's website and on social media. What made the article famous or infamous if you like, was the infamous words that have now got an entrenched reputation: âYouâll own nothing. And youâll be happyâ. The original article can be found on the Wayback Machine, as Ida Auken herself, or the WEF, or both together first âeditedâ the article and then later completely removed it from the website. I do wonder why? Both happened at the start of 2021, when the corona-pandemic, according to later statements from Ida Auken, made âconspiracy theoristsâ mix her predictions together with âThe Great Resetâ.
As you would expect, she has never explained why the article has been removed, and this fact alone is worthy of my further attention, later. In the edited article it can be seen that the WEF, or Ida Auken herself, or both, has done some damage control and attempted to dumb the article down, for example by changing the title from âWelcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been betterâ to the less controversial âHere's how life could change in my city by the year 2030â. Auken's original article was reprinted by Forbes on 10th November 2016, so fortunately it can also be found there. You can also still find the launch page of WEFs âEight Predictions for the Worldâ on their official website, where Ida Auken's article was the first of the eight predictions for the world. Interestingly enough, if you click on Ida's article, you will see that it is no longer on the website. It has simply been deleted, almost certainly because of growing criticism and mounting ridicule. However, you can still view Ida Auken's âOwn nothing, be happyâ statement in the launch video at the bottom of the page.
The WEF removed a post on social media of which the video was part, supposedly because it went viral with negative comments about the WEF. It is interesting to realise that these eight predictions, which allegedly should have been done by eight different contributors, seems to have been coordinated quite accurately with the goals which the WEF is still working towards, now, seven years later. Either the WEF has been unbelievably lucky using accurate fortune tellers, like Ida Auken, to contribute in 2016, or it was paid work, or at the very least carefully coordinated and planned contributions from Ida Auken and the other seven. Ida Auken was at the time part of the WEF's Global Future Councils, and it is possible that the seven other writers were too. This could explain how well coordinated their future tellings were. On the day of the opening of the Danish Parliament, Folketinget, on 4th October 2022, I met Ida Auken in front of Christiansborg (the parliament building). I asked her how great the influence on Danish politics the WEF has. "Nothing!" she says and shortly after, she says the same thing about the Bilderberg group. Then I asked her the question âthen, why is she part of both organisations, if they do not have any influence on Danish politicsâ? To this she answers that she is part of both because she can have influence on the organisations in order for her to make them do something for the climate! This is a strange backward logic that Ida is making use of here. Why would she spend time on organisations which, according to herself, have no influence on a country like Denmark? These people just lie, and lie and lie. In fact, it reminds one of the oft quoted phrase; How does one know when a politician (or, in this case a spokesperson for the WEF) is lying? The answer, of course is, when their lips are moving.
It is also slightly strange that Ida Auken had to travel to the WEF and Bilderberger meetings, and then just fire away some random points about the climate, whereby she gains influence on the climate area. Which then, after all, as she maintains, has no influence on Denmark, and therefore, I guess, not on any other country either? Unless, of course, if it was the case that all other countries are so helplessly far behind Denmark that they learn a lot from Ida Aukenâs utterances about the climate. Who knows what is going on in the head of Ida Auken? I cannot fathom the logic. You can view the short interview with Ida 19 minutes and 30 seconds in a YouTube video âFolketingets ĂĽbning 4. oktober 2022â on my YouTube-kanal (it's in Danish). What is the reason that the WEF and Ida Auken do not stand by their article from 2016? Is this about that there are too many critics, who have seen right through it all and realised that the WEF is a great proponent to support that the world should go through a great reset and thereafter introduce a one world government? And also that this collaboration between global institutions like the EU, UN, WHO, NATO, the World Bank institutions and many more are not playing with open cards with the world's population?
Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better
(the original quotation from the first Ida Auken-article)
During the Danish election for parliament in 2022, TjekDet (the Danish fact-checker organisation) found that they had to fact-check the leader of a new Danish political party Pernille Vermund. This new party is called âNye Borgerligeâ. Pernille Vermund made a post on social media that had criticised the WEF for seeking to assume the right to own property from people, on the back of Ida Aukens article. TjekDet made supposed 'experts' comment on the post in order for them to make a concerted negative fact-check of Pernille Vermund. What they did not do, which was a major journalistic blunder, was to ask the WEF. However TjekDet believe themselves to have the ammunition they need to shut Pernille Vermund down. These fact-checkers are nothing more than self-elected judges of opinion and I deem them utterly revolting. This is especially heinous considering that Danish tax payers have paid millions for their services; voicing the false narrative of the globalists, twisting and falsifying their fact-checks. Regarding this specific fact-check, Ida Auken herself was an 'expert witness' but was not even asked, which makes the whole affair even more dodgy. There are several links to her article, however not the original one from WEF's website. But on the WayBack Machine you can find copies - and TjekDet seem not in the least concerned as to why the article, that their 'fact-check' is about, is no longer on the website of the WEF where it was first published!
So it is clear to see that all this is not of any interest to TjekDet, who must have fallen into a deep journalistic slumber while they were in the process of their 'fact-check'! I think that TjekDet has, once more, contributed to a taxpayers money consuming, globalist agenda pushing, brain washing and misguiding article!
Another globalist-friendly media Politi-fact did a fact check in English, as did Reuters and at lot of other fact-check medias. All of them totally obfuscating simple facts and adding total confusion to the mix.Globalistic Social Liberalism
Ida Auken's bare-faced cheek that she uses to massage the globalistic social liberalism into the minds of the population, leaves me disgusted. It seems to only spellbind a fast falling number of the population, falling as the total population slowly begin to realise how these actor politicians are caught in the game of the globalist marionette theatre. I wonder, if politicians, like Ida Auken, know that they are being played? I sometimes wonder even more, because she sometimes plays her part so well, as the politician who wants a lot of good things for her country and for the climate. I further wonder that, if she is so into playing her part, she actually believes in the spin herself? It would be truly frightening, if that were the case.
Founder of WEF, Klaus Schwab, is more direct in his communication in his âpenetrate (s)the cabinetsâ-interview from September 20, 2017 at Harvard Kennedy School:
Links:
* Wayback Machineâs copy of Ida Aukenâs original WEF article regarding owing nothing but being happy: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125135500/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is
* Wayback Machineâs copy of Ida Aukenâs edited WEF article (later it was completely erased): https://web.archive.org/web/20210427224934/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/
* Magasinet Forbes also made a copy of Aukenâs original article on the 10th of November, 2016: https://www.forbes.com/sites/worldeconomicforum/2016/11/10/shopping-i-cant-really-remember-what-that-is-or-how-differently-well-live-in-2030/
* WEFâs homepage when launching â8 predictions for the worldâ on Wayback Machine.: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125144156/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030
* TjekDet fact-check of Pernille Vermund on the 27th of October, 2022, regarding WEF: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/pernille-vermund-vaekker-konspirationsteoretikerne-midt-i-valgkampen
* PolitiFact fact-check on Ida Aukenâs statements and WEF âWorld Economic Forum âelitesâ are pushing the Great Reset, which aims to control people by taking all their possessions.â: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/28/instagram-posts/world-economic-forum-elites-are-pushing-the-great/
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
âEvent 201â
Event 201 took place on 18th October 2019 and the organisers were the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and John Hopkins University. Besides these, the George Soros controlled firm, âOpen Philanthropyâ also donated considerable funding. Although fact- checkers (who it would seem are funded by the very organisations they purport to âfact-check) categorically deny that Event 201 was an exercise which predicted the corona virus outbreak and the following pandemic, is it close to mind to suggest exactly that. Later on, we will look at the role which the press and the media played in relation to the three fictions used to brainwash the people. There is great humoristic value in looking at the Danish fact-checking institution âTjek Detâ and their fact-checking of the rumour that Event 201 indeed predicted the pandemic. Their fact-check was issued on 27th of April 2020. It first drew in the wildest accusations from the side of the critics, to then produce a complete debunk of the very idea that Event 201 by any means predicted the pandemic, so that the reader is left with the impression that âthere is nothing to see hereâ. There is, of course, plenty to see here!
It was put forward that Event 201 was a so-called âtable top exerciseâ, a simulation if you like, of a scenario that 60 million people die from a âpandemic outbreakâ. Of course, even the most dim-witted individual cannot possibly ignore that this simulation was all too similar in so many ways to the corona virus âoutbreakâ which the media reported took place in China only just a few months later. So much so, that the organisers have had to distribute a press release to assure everyone of the opposite. That Event 201 receives so much critisism from the corona sceptic faction in different countries around the world, is connected to the fact that the organisers are from the same organisations who rolled in the gold during the pandemic and at the same time were the ones to predict it. Besides this damning situation, several experts have presented further evidence supporting that the corona virus is made in a laboratory. Yet still others have questioned the very existence of the virus at all, one individual offering anybody a million euros to actually provide proof of the isolation and make-up of this supposed âvirusâ. To date, this has not been claimed as not one individual or company has ever actually done this. Amongst these nay-sayers was the now deceased Nobel Price awarded virologist Luc Montagnier. I will get back to him, as he is not just Mr anybody, since he actually received the Nobel award for identifying the HIV âvirusâ and the related disease âAIDSâ. Indeed, this âEvent 201â was only just one way in which the prediction and the carrying out of this so-called Corona Virus Outbreak came to fruition.
Bill and Melinda Gates likewise predicted the pandemic during an interview, where they are seen to be even smiling, both of them, as Bill reveals his ânewsâ. During a meeting at the World Economic Forum, Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales, now King Charles, has threatened the world's population that more pandemics will come, if the WEF did not build a âsustainableâ world. In 2017 and 2018 (before there was any mention of a âpandemicâ) millions of PCR test kits were exported to the world's countries, including to Denmark. In 2017 Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Deseases (NIAID) in the USA, guaranteed that more surprising âoutbreaksâ were on their way within the next four years. Five months ahead of the âpandemicâ the WHO requested that their 193/194 member states should prepare for a coming pandemic. These happenings, and many more, are described and documented in a video from Stop World Control which was published in May 2022 with the title "Proof that the pandemic was planned with a purpose". However, perhaps most clear and trustworthy evidence that Event 201 is a part of a wider conspiracy, came from no less than the nephew of (murdered) US President John F. Kennedy; Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He published a book in 2021 with the title "The Real Anthony Fauci". The book consists of some 600 pages which chronicle Anthony Fauci, who is the American equivelent of his Danish counterpart Søren Brøstrøm. Of course, Fauci naturally has a much greater responsibility than the director of the Danish Health Authorityâs BrøstrĹm. Besides being the director of previously mentioned NIAID, Fauci (a.k.a Dr. Death, as he is nicknamed in the UK) is also the chief medical advisor to the President of the USA. Kennedyâs book can also be viewed in a film version, lasting one hour and fifty minutes. It can be found on âOdyseeâ, as YouTube is unfortunately censoring (actually banning) it.
The film goes through Event 201 from around three and a half minutes in and, after six minutes, Robert F. Kennedy points at the peculiar fact that the second-in-command at the CIA, Deputy Director Avril Haines, is one of the âhostsâ at the simulation. You may well ask; âWhat is the secret service of the USA doing at a simulation of a pandemic outbreakâ? You may further ask, âwhy is the CIA so interested in the training and preparation for a pandemic, that they send their second in command to co-host the event?â Haines makes use of her hosting role at Event 201 to underline that 'misinformation' cannot be avoided, and that a 'flood zone strategy' should be applied to counter it. Every attempt was made at the event to ensure that the concerted narrative was propagated everywhere and the only one which should be heard, making it extremely hard for any normal inquisitive individuals to receive other information than what was fed to them via the established media. A line of other experts, even military experts, also take part in the simulation and add their voices to attempt to silence the vaccine sceptics. People must be forced to believe the WHO, their governments and the pharmaceutical industry, these organisations even involving their countriesâ secret services to ensure that this can happen as smoothly as possible without too many complications in relation to any so-called 'misinformation'. What in the name of all that is Holy was going on?
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill Gates is one of the world's richest men because he controls a âfoundationâ with the largest wealth in the world. He is also a man plagued by his past within the software industry and his firm Microsoft, where he made his money. However, he also had to spend a great deal of his valuable time answering court cases in relation to unethical business methods. He has avoided paying tax on his fortune and now he calls himself a philanthropist. What could possibly go wrong? One thing is clear. When you question whether or not Bill Gates is a philanthropist or a tax avoider, it is important to keep in mind that it would seem that the foundation has redefined the term philanthropy from being understood as giving money from a good heart, into investing a large part of the âdonationâ in a company by buying up its shares. According to a CNBC article from September 2019, 60% of BMGF's assets are invested in shares and although the foundation had âdonatedâ 36 billion dollars over the last couple of decades, it has still increased its wealth.
Another CNBC article from January 2019 focusses upon the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos in January 2019, where Bill Gates explains that his best investment ever is his investment in vaccines which has increased in value by a factor of twenty(!!) in ten years. In relation to looking into what could possibly go wrong, it is lucky for us sceptics that the BMFG has a website informing us how their money is distributed. Similarly, the WHO also has a website informing us about who their sponsors are. As previously documented, the BMFG donated between 17% and 22% of the total budget of the WHO in the period 2016 to 2021. It looks like it was also carrying on in 2022. In October and November 2022 alone, BMFG donated more than 90 million U.S Dollars to the WHO. This is the same as 630 million Danish Crowns, donated in just two months! Surely they wouldnât be making donations on a whim without expecting anything back? Remember also that the BMGF cannot buy shares in the WHO as the organisation is not a shareholder-owned company. Well, of course, Bill Gates did get it his way. Letâs go back to the candidate he wanted for the DG of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom. Letâs also go back to the fact that China was also in support and agreement for this âcandidateâ. It turned out that Tedros Adhanom has known Bill and Melinda Gates for many years. While Tedros was Health Minister in 2010 to 2014, their foundation donated 1.5 billion US Dollars (over 10 billion Danish Crowns) to a 'family planning project' in Ethiopia. Again, not something the mainstream media finds worth mentioning. The previously mentioned Fox News article from 27th March 2020 uses the bulk part of its page space to ask questions about Tedros' past and his rather too much enthusiasm for covering up China's poor handling at the beginning of the crisis. It seems that even Fox News dared not focus on the wanton corruption of the WHO by Bill Gates. We need a more alternative media for that before we can muster enough courage to challenge the inappropriate close connection between Tedros and Gates. See, for example an article from Brightwork Research & Analysis from November 2021.
Tedros Adhanom is also part of an advisory board in a Fund for Global Health which, likewise, receives potent donations from the BMGF. Besides, the CEO of the Fund for Global Health was the previous head of the department for Global Health Policy in the BMGF. Again, this is not something which the mainstream media bother (or dare) to report. It looks suspiciously like Bill Gates does not have to ask Tedros Adhanom for any favours, does he? Tedros already knows full well whoâs pocket he lives in and it makes him the perfect marionette to enable Bill Gates to carry on with his nefarious ways.
The Johns Hopkins University
You may not have noticed during the corona pandemic, but Johns Hopkinsâ Coronavirus Resource Center, together with the WHO, have been the central global information service. Both organisations have websites with dashboards (overviews) which tell us about the global status of COVID-19 calculated in the number of cases of infection and number of deaths. On both Johns Hopkins University's (JHU) and WHO's websites there is also information on the global vaccine rollout listed as a percentage of each countryâs population that is vaccinated. For example, the status of Denmark shows that 4.8 million Danes (out of a total population of 5.8 million) are reported to having received, as a minimum, one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. None of the websites qualify or attempt to explain that "number of deaths" does not mean the number of people who have died of COVID-19, but it means the number of people who tested positive within a certain period before they died. For example, a person could have died during heart surgery and still be included in these statistics if they were tested positive, even if it wasnât âcovidâ that âkilledâ them.
To further assist the already cloudy perspective, these websites do not include any information about the side effects and deaths that these non-vaccines have caused (remember that it is by definition that an mRNA vaccine is NOT a vaccine). It is indeed very difficult to find any information about the harm caused by the mRNA jabs which have been (under) reported since their rollout. Equally, it has not been possible to find a link to either the American database for side effects (VAERS) or the European counterpart, The European Medicinesâ Agency (EMA) on either of the websites of the JHU or the WHO. On the EMA you can read that on the year up to 25th December 2022 that 701 million doses of the Pfizer jabs have been given - and 971,000 suspected side effects, including deaths, have been (under) reported. With Moderna the number is 161 million doses with 274,000 suspected side effects. A very important perspective on this is that these numbers of reports have been found to be under 10% of the real numbers, according to critical scientific research.
Johns Hopkins Medicine, part of the JHU conglomerate, offers the COVID death-jab to children as young as six months in one of their clinics locally in Maryland. We can therefore see that the JHU has also invested in the distribution of the vaccine. In 2020 the New York Times wrote an article about the founder of the JHU and that he was a slave-owner despite the university having promoting itself as if he were against slavery. It was not until 1945 that the first ethnic African student was accepted at the university, even though it is situated in Baltimore, Maryland, which interestingly enough has a majority of ethnic African Americans! Again, the article is behind a pay-wall and yet again the Wackback Machine comes to our aid. Guess what? The largest donor of the JHU is BMGF who single handedly, during a three month period from October to December 2022 donated altogether 22 million US Dollars, which is about 157 million Danish Crowns. Oh dear.
The World Economic Forum and COVID-19: The Great Reset.
When you talk about the globalists, or the global elite, i.e. the very small percentage of the world's population who can actually profit from a corona pandemic or from other crises such as the âwar in the Ukraineâ, there is one prime organisation in particular that takes care of their interests, namely the World Economic Forum (WEF). One World Government (OWG) is a concept for which the WEF is probably the most outspoken advocate in the world. The implementation of the OWG means that the world will be ruled by an unified and probably unelected and unelectable world government. A world government that will gradually control all areas of local governments whose power will slowly diminish in favour of the centralised power of this new âone world governmentâ. Indeed, a simple search for âGlobal Governanceâ on the World Economic Forum (WEF) website will return over 100 hits. From this simple action, then, we can deduce that are more than one hundred articles on Global Governance. This is precisely because OWG and Global Governance are enshrined terminologies that in WEF-speak mean roughly the same thing. OWG is the noun and Global Governance is the management concept or ideology behind the aim to implement OWG. One of the top search results is WEF's own strategic tool (called Strategic Intelligence), which you can also easily access by entering your email address. Here you can read, that the WEF defines Global Governance as follows:
âGlobal governance functions through a set of institutions, rules, and processes that aim to manage cross-border issues â like diplomatic relations, trade, financial transactions, migration, and climate change. It seeks to address collective concerns, and mediate common interests, creating both privileges and obligations for the public and private sectors. It is also essential for solving problems that cross borders: pandemics, wars, and financial crises. It is not, however, just a set of treaties and organisations; it is comprised of a vast network of collaborative processes, relationships, guidelines, and monitoring mechanisms, which are all necessary to manage our increasingly complex interdependence.â
In other words, TOTAL CONTROL. Total control of YOU!
From this, then, OWG and Global Governance sound completely as one; co-conspiratorial, if you like, especially when it comes to the above definition from which it appears that regardless of the 'management speak' that is in the language, it just seems to be a conspiracy that the WEF itself gets to define itself. They don't even attempt to hide that they promoting a conspiracy! But this isnât just the worst of the smoking guns in terms of the WEF and conspiracy theory, or rather The WEF and the conspiracy, since it is no longer a theory, as the WEF itself presents the conspiracy on full public display. No, because the 'smoking gun' has long been the book "COVID-19: The Great Reset", which founder Klaus Schwab published at the beginning of July 2020. The book presents how the corona pandemic offers an almost perfect opportunity to restart the entire world, centralise power and give the globalists even more effective tools to rule the world as they see fit. The book can be found online as a downloadable PDF file. During a launch of "COVID-19: The Great Reset" on 13/14th July 2020, the WEF published a live recording video where founder Klaus Schwab goes over the details of the plan. This big restart, The Great Reset, according to WEF's founder, is the last of three phases related to the corona pandemic: 1. Restrain (combat), 2. Recover (back to 'a new normal'), 3. Reset (define and design the strategies to lead the world after the corona pandemic). In the launch video (6 minutes and 30 seconds in), Klaus Schwab reviews the five priorities which the WEF is focusing upon in order to implement The Great Reset during the specified third phase:
1. Reshaping the social contract
2.The green economy
3. Use of advanced technologies
4. From shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism
5. Stronger global cooperation.
If you want to know what Klaus Schwab means by reshaping the social contract, the implementation of the âgreen economyâ, the use of advanced technology, the move from shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism and the implementation of stronger global cooperation, you must watch the video "COVID-19 The Great Reset" that the WEF has put up on their project launch page on their website. There it is; clear for all to see.
Four years previously, Klaus Schwab published the book âThe Fourth Industrial Revolutionâ in which he focuses especially on the third point above, namely the use of technology to merge humans and machines.
It is remarkable that the entire WEF's massive institution was involved in the promotion of âCOVID-19: The Great Resetâ so quickly after the pandemic outbreak. Already on 15th May 2020 an article was published about The Great Reset on the WEF's website: âHow the great COVID-19 reset can help firms build a sustainable futureâ â this came out only two months after the WHO declared the pandemic. Furthermore, the previously mentioned book âCOVID-19: The Great Resetâ came out only three or four months after the WHO declared the pandemic. Any critically thinking person by now must seriouly consider if it is possible for an organisation like the WEF to launch a project this big and, at the same time, publish a book about a pandemic so shortly after the world is hit by the pandemic, seemingly unprepared? Wait! This was exactly what WEF was: Prepared! For they had of course already prepared themselves in collaboration with the BMGF and the JHU during Event 201. However, had they really prepared themselves so well, that the book âCOVID-19: The Great Resetâ had already been written and just needed proof reading and publishing? Well, that is for you to surmise!
In the light of this, I would define it as a conspiracy (I would challenge anyone to disagree) that the WEF makes use of of multiple management terms in order to create 'swung' (manipulative language) in their wording of their work and purpose, whilst implementing OWG via The Great Reset - and it's not at all a coincidence. When Klaus Schwab founded the organisation in 1971, the original name was The European Management Forum. Its purpose was then to integrate American management principles into the European work culture and, interestingly enough, it was two primary groups of sponsors who helped Schwab start the initiative: The European Commission and the European Organisations of Industry. The latter would then over time become one collected power-centralised organisation â The European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT) founded in 1983. This organisation will be mentioned under the three fictions, as it is a very central player in the activities of the Deep State in Europe.
The WEF's strong ties to industry is all over-reaching and saturates the founder's pen in the book âThe Fourth Industrial Revolutionâ. The book glorifies, amongst other things, the possibilities of industry to allow robots and artificial intelligence to take over large parts of the ruling and operation of world society. Exactly this desire to make use of advanced technology in order to transform society and the humans in it is an intrinsic characteristic trait of the WEF. The film âSubmitting humanity to the rule of elite cyborgsâ, produced by the organisation Stop World Control, goes into detail around the desire of the WEF to transform humans into cyborgs. The correct scientific term for this is transhumanism. These cyborgs would be controlled by a smaller group of elite cyborgs, and these elite cyborgs are a result of the current global elite's trans-human transformation. Does this sound far-fetched â even crazy to you? Well, these scenarios are not from my mouth or pen, but instead, why donât you listen to the WEF's leading scientist in the trans-humanistic area, Yuval Harari. After 28 minutes and 56 seconds into the film, he says that the global elite and humanity will follow two different trans-humanistic paths: One group of cyborgs shall control the other. Professor Harari is also involved in the UN and the WHO and a wide range of other international organisations. Who is this guy? We find that he is a professor and lecturer from the Department of History of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. What on Godâs Green Earth has that to do with âtranshumanismâ, cyborgs and how does his history background give him the remotest qualification to be the âleading scientistâ in the WEF and (presumably) also the WHO regarding the âtrans-humanisticâ arena?
Links:
* The Nation article on Bill Gates and his philantropy (pay-walled!): https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy
* Same article on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200318135836/https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/
* Description of Event 201 by the organisers themselves: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/event201/about
* Danish fact-check media Tjek Detâs fact-check of Event 201 being part of planning the corona pandemic: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/vil-bill-gates-affolke-verden-med-vacciner-vilde-teorier-faar-nyt-liv-i-coronatiden
* Event 201 organisers had to counteract the rumours: https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/2020/statement-about-ncov-and-our-pandemic-exercise-0
* Stopworldcontrol.com video documenting WHOâs 10 year plan from 2020 to 2030: https://stopworldcontrol.com/proof/
* Robert F. Kennedyâs Wikipedia side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.
* Real Anthony Fauci, video on Odysee.com: https://odysee.com/@drizakeo_cryptic_archive:3/Real_Anthony_Fauci_Movie_drizakeo:3
* Avril Hainesâ Wikipedia profile: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avril_Haines
* CNBC article from 17th of September 2019 on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/17/bill-gates-gave-away-35-billion-this-year-but-net-worth-didnt-drop.html
* CNBC article from 23th January 2019 on Bill Gates investing in vaccines: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html
* Brightwork Research & Analysis article from 4th of November 2021: https://www.brightworkresearch.com/how-bill-gates-bought-control-over-the-who
* EMA database on reported vaccine side-effects: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/vaccines-covid-19/safety-covid-19-vaccines
* New York Times article on Johns Hopkins and his relations to keeping slaves (pay-walled!): https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/arts/johns-hopkins-slavery-abolitionist.html
* Same NY Times article on WayBack Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20201209183005/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/arts/johns-hopkins-slavery-abolitionist.html
* Bill Gates is the biggest donor of Johns Hopkins, according to BMGFâs homepage: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=Johns%20hopkins
* WEFâs over 100 articles on Global Governance on their homepage: https://www.weforum.org/search?query=global+governance
* Klaus Schwabs book âCOVID-19 The Great Resetâ available as PDF-file: https://carterheavyindustries.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/covid-19_-the-great-reset-klaus-schwab.pdf
* WEFâs launch on 13/14. July 2020 of the project âCOVID-19 The Great Resetâ: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/covid-19-the-great-reset/
* WEF article from 15th May 2020 âHow the great COVID-19 reset can help firms build aâŚâ: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/the-covid-19-reset-sustainability/
* Stop World Control article âCRY FOR FREEDOM â Why cyborgs wonât save the worldâ: https://stopworldcontrol.com/cry-freedom/
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher
The WHO Director-General Charged with Genocide
It was indeed Bill Gates who supported the election of Eritrean-born Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus for Director-General, the highest post in the organisation of the WHO. China also supported this ex-minister from the government of Ethiopia. Dr Ghebreyesus has a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Community Health from the University of Nottinghamhy.
As a curiosity it can also be mentioned that Dr Ghebreyesus sat in the Ethiopian government as health minister representing a Marxisistic-Leninistic party, the Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF). His communist past certainly correlated well with China supporting him for the post.
As if this is not controversial enough, that the Director-General comes directly from a communist party, Adhanom is also charged at the International Criminal Court in the Hague (ICC) with committing genocide at the time when he was in government in Ethiopia. It was the Nobel's Peace Prize awarded American, David Steiman who actually managed to press the charges via the ICC. In England, The Times, The Daily Mirror and The Daily Star have all written about the court case. At the time of first writing this book (November - December 2022) the case has not yet commenced. The judge at the Hague court has demanded more expanding evidence and the case is still being prepared here in October of 2024. However, what is indisputable is that the TPLF is a terror organisation, banned by the current Ethiopian government. This fact has been documented by many Western sources.
The British freelance journalist, Graham Peebles, who has been involved in educational programmes in Sri Lanka, Ethiopia and India since 2005, has written an article about the TPLF's terror activities published by âCounterpunchâ. He writes that the TPLF is a terror organisation which has recently taken up terrorism again after the organisation lost power in Ethiopia in 2018. It also explains that western support for the TPLF, especially from the USA, UK and some EU countries, is the reason that this terror organisation could show enough military power to start a civil war in the country. This confirms how western countries have traditionally caused and created unrest in Africa, especially in the countries south of Sahara. It seems that they are doing this deliberately for their own gain. In one of the media channels to which the Peebles article is also referring, Voice of America (VOA), one can read an entirely different version article about the TPLF's new military offensive in Ethiopia's Tigray region. In the article, we can read that (believe it or not) it is no less than Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who is quoted giving a verbal attack on the western countries and the Ethiopian government for not doing enough to help create peace in the countryâŚ
It is extraordinary that Adhanom is not at all critical towards the TPLF. The article also exposes how the western media twists reality. The article also fails to mention that Tedros is one of the former leaders of the TPLF. In fact, the TPLF is not specifically mentioned in the article, at all, with only an indirect reference as the "Tigray Rebel Forces". This is how the reader is misguided in getting the mistaken impression that it is the rebels in Tigray who are the good guys in the conflict, which goes absolutely against the far more trustworthy eyewitness testimony of Peebles. This type of exclusion of the facts also contributes to the majority of the populations of the WHO member states being completely unaware of the charges against Tedros at the court in the Hague. In general, not much is written about the charges he faces and whilst the case is under preparation, the TPLF continues its western-supported criminal terror activities in the Tigray province of Ethiopia. Geographically, this province has boundaries to Eritrea which also has a secondary role in the conflict.
So then, it can be seen that much points to the Director-General of the WHO and his conviction of genocide. The possibility alone that this can happen surely ought to make all the journalists in the world sharpen their pens. However this is not happening! It is still very limited as to how much is being written about the case in the mainstream media and I will get back to why this is so in a later section about the Press - the fourth state power. However, at this juncture, I will conclude this chapter by putting forward an article by Fox News from 27th of March 2020, where great doubts about Tedros Adhanom are raised, both in relation to his time as minister in Ethiopia and also to China's inadequate and dubious response at the beginning of the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The article also questions the CV of the Director-General which is found to be inflated and misguiding.
Benevolent philanthropist or cynical tax avoider?
At this juncture, let us return to the person who took part in installing Tedros Adhanom as Director-General of the WHO and who, more than any other, has had a finger in the pie in relation to the corona pandemic. It is of course no other than Bill Gates. People have been well programmed to view him as a philanthropist and to react with disbelief when so-called conspiracy theorists dare to doubt his philanthropic intentions in relation to the pandemic. However, where thereâs smoke, thereâs fire and in the following section, the information I propagate about Bill Gates will be completely substantiated with related links to sources in the footnotes, so that you can form an opinion of both sides of the story. Of course, I will naturally focus on the side of the story which is not told by the mainstream media.
Although most people know who Bill Gates is, for the sake of accuracy and understanding, let me draft his background anyhow. Not only is he (via his foundation) one of the world's richest men, he is also a philanthropist. That is the impression you get from reading about him online and listening to what mainstream media say about him. A philanthropist, according to the Danish dictionary, is a person who unselfishly works to help his fellow human beings, especially by making donations to good causes. Through the Microsoft empire, Bill Gates made a lot of money, especially during the 1990s and the early 2000s. Microsoft had developed a software platform which became the dominating operating system for virtually every computer, tablet, and other means of electronic communication on the planet. At the end of his time as the top executive at Microsoft he went through long, humiliating and exhausting lawsuits; in 2000, he stepped down from the position of CEO of Microsoft and finally made the decision to place the bulk of his assets from Microsoft into a âfoundationâ which is known today as the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. He also withdrew gradually until 2020, he finally left the board of directors, although he still spends about 10% of his time at its Redmont, Washington headquarters, meeting with product teams, he says.
By placing these assets in a âfoundationâ, these are no longer registered as a personal fortune. It's a manoeuvre which the oil baron John D. Rockefeller paved the way with more than one hundred years previously. This means that a billionaire who makes use of this loophole or âtrickâ is exempt from paying tax on the accumulated wealth. In the case of Bill Gates he got away with not paying tax on about 80 billion dollars! Now, by any stretch of the imagination, that is a lot of money which the tax authorities in the United States of America have failed to collect and an awful lot of money which could have gone into the public coffers to benefit the wider population in general. Maybe one could argue that the country will benefit from the money in the shape of charity, will it not? I maintain that this is far from certain! All that will happen is that this âfoundationâ which the money has been transferred to could just end up becoming richer and richer over the years. Even though the foundation on the surface is a charitable not-for-profit organisation, shrewd investment in, e.g. the weapons industry and chocolate producers can increase the foundations assets; And this is exactly what the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is being criticised for doing; accumulating wealth from dubious industries and using this wealth to apply pressure on American legislators. A great trick exploiting a loophole for the super-rich to avoid paying tax on their profits.
In the case of the chocolate investments the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have been criticised for their investments in the chocolate giant Mondelez, which is known for using chocolate from cocoa farms using child labour. Judge yourself how philanthropic you think Bill Gates is, when you can read in an article from 2019 in Jyllandsposten and Politiken (two Danish mainstream papers) that Bill Gates is becoming richer and richer by being a philanthropist. According to the article his fortune increased with the net value of 16 billion dollars during a period in 2019, when he was supposed to donate 35 billion to charitable causes. In the same article you can read that amongst these âcharitable causesâ, which Bill Gates has invested in over time, is GAVI, the vaccine alliance which he founded himself. This is the same alliance which donates large sums to the WHO. I wonder if this is without getting anything in return? Bill Gates says himself that he has a strategy which is about owning a large part of stocks in the companies that he donates to or invests in. The wealth which is used to surround Bill Gates with a saint-like glow in most media that write about him, is not necessarily really charity that benefits the people. It is more likely benefiting himself.
Those who achieve the greatest benefit from making use of the Rockefeller trick are primarily Bill and Melinda Gates who have enormous sums at their disposal. They use the assets of the foundation to apply pressure politically in areas that are of special interest to them. For example, they are trying to influence legislation about the taxation of USAâs segment of super rich billionaires. However, the weapons industry and chocolate are far from the only industries that the foundation invests in. Where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has increasingly focused their investments in is the vaccine industry. It is a fact that the foundation has invested enormous sums in the vaccine manufacturer Moderna which, until 2019, had only been carrying out research on a special mRNA vaccine technology, never really producing a vaccine for commercial use. This all changed by the end of 2020 when Moderna, together with Pfizer-Biontech, were the first two vaccine manufacturers who, within a very short period of each other, launched the new mRNA âvaccinesâ. These were vaccines which were supposed to reduce sickness and death in relation to the corona âpandemicâ, which allegedly (according to the established media) broke out in Wuhan at the end of 2019.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has also invested large amounts of money in Pfizer-Biontech, which is the other mRNA vaccine manufacturer, which, like Moderna also received âtemporary emergency approvalâ to enable them to take their products to market in 2020. It has to be mentioned that to call mRNA a âvaccine technologyâ is controversial, as mRNA is not a technology that is used in the same way as is generally understood as the common function of vaccines. However, I will get back to this in a later chapter. Furthermore, I mentioned earlier that Bill Gates has funded the previously mentioned organisation called GAVI, which is the âVaccine Allianceâ, which makes use of different means to influence legislation and other political decision making processes around the production and availability of vaccines. GAVI is one of the large sponsors of the WHO as mentioned in a previous chapter and it is controlled by Bill Gates. One of the few articles over the years, which criticises Bill Gates for making use of the Rockefeller taxation trick, is an article by Tim Schwab in the American publication The Nation. Whilst the article is unfortunately placed behind a pay wall, it can be found on the WayBack Machine. I hope you will now see Bill Gates, his âfoundationâ, his involvement with the WHO and the corona âpandemicâ in a much more critical light after having read this chapter, even though you may have previously perceived him portrayed as the ultimate philanthropist by the mainstream media.
Links:
* Berlingske article from 24th of March 2020 (behind paywall!): https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/nu-advarer-who-danmark-vil-vaere-lukket-ned-i-maanedsvis-uden-skifte-til
* James Roguskis substack hjemmeside, hvor han eksponerer WHOs planer om at overtage mere suverĂŚnitet fra medlemslandene:
* WHOâs own budget homepage where all donations are listed: https://open.who.int/2020-21/contributors/contributor
* Daily Star article describing the charges of Ghebreyesus at the ICC by David Steinman: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/world-health-organisation-chief-could-23166539
* Graham Peebles, from The Create Trust, has written this article about TPLF and their terror activities: https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/09/02/renewed-tplf-terror-war-against-the-ethiopian-people
* Voice of America article which fails to mention serious details about Ghebreyesus: https://www.voanews.com/a/who-chief-calls-tigray-worst-humanitarian-man-made-disaster-on-earth-/6705674.html
* Fox News article from 27th of March 2020 on Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: https://www.foxnews.com/world/who-chief-tedros-questionable-past-coronavirus
* Article in Danish JP/Politiken media Finans from 20th of September 2019: https://finans.dk/investor/ECE11624354/saa-aggressiv-er-bill-gates-naar-hans-milliarder-skal-investeres
* The Nation article on Bill Gates and his philantropi (behind paywall!): https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy
* Same article (not behind paywall!) on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200318135836/https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher
Will Novo Nordisk be the next vaccine giant?
The Danish Ministry of Health and the Danish Corona Corruption
(Part 2 - continued from previous section)
It can therefore be seen that one does not have to be a very critical thinker to see the pattern in this whole charade, as the cards can can be summarised as follows:
⢠Per Okkels is apperantly asked to knock his health director into place, allegedly because director Søren Brostrøm is not supportive enough about the government's corona narrative, explicitly expressed in âthe extreme precautionary principleâ. Okkels is likely asked by one or more non-publicly known backers â possibly the prime minister, a head of department from the prime minister's office, a minister for health and the elderly or a fourth person â Or are we to believe that Okkels does the knocking completely on his own initiative?
⢠Half a year later, Per Okkels gets a golden ticket to a comfortable and lucrative transition to his pension via a part-time position in the incredibly rich Novo Nordisk Foundation
⢠This is a smart move to hide this wrongdoing, as the new head of department cannot be blamed for the deviation from professionalism and deviation from the 'proportionality principle', which has probably subsequently already become commonplace practice in the Ministry of Health. Per Okkels cannot be blamed either, or at least wont experience any repercussions, as he has retired.
⢠In addition, Per Okkels' new organisation is the Novo Nordisk Foundation which suddenly, from March 2022 and less than twelve months after Okkels joined the foundation, embarks upon major development work together with Bill Gates on the development of new antiviral medicine. Not insulin as is the companyâs field of expertise, but antiviral medicine!
⢠The project is called "Pandemic Antiviral Discovery" (PAD) and aims to catalyse discovery and early development of antiviral drugs for use in future pandemics. PAD is used for the development of vaccines, even though the word 'vaccines' is not mentioned at all, neither in the Novo Nordisk Foundationâs nor the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's press releases. The project raises 90 million dollars (600 million danish kroner) in 2022 for their vaccine adventure and a triple amount (1,8 billion danish kroner) in 2024.
⢠In the meantime, the Danish Medicines Agency's director Thomas Senderovitz has also switched to Novo Nordisk after ensuring that the first COVID-19 vaccines are approved for emergency use in Denmark. Also in that position, it offers certain advantages that there is a change of director, so that any responsibility becomes more difficult to place when the population begins to understand that these vaccines were planned right before the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The responsible backers are trying to muddy the picture, so as to make any eventual legal responsibility much more difficult to place. In this termiteâs nest of deception, try to get the average Dane to think about who can be held responsible for what happened? Quite difficult, isnât it?
Even Søren BrostrÜm has after all just followed an order from his head of department and probably got a hint with a red-hot poker to join in the charade. In addition, that same Autumn, Brostrøm was offered a top WHO position to boot. Dagens Medicin writes that, on the 28th of October 2020, Søren Brostrøm will, from May 2021 become part of WHO's global board. Even the minister who is responsible for what is going on seems to be quite happy reaping the fruits of his ill-gotten labours.
Health Minister Magnus Heunicke will be honoured by Berlingske and Kantar Gallup in July 2021 as the most popular minister in the government that sat until the general election of 1st of November 2022, more than a year and a half after the start of the corona escapade. Following this, Heunicke also secured another ministerial post in the scandalous SVM (coalition) government of December 2022.
As described above, the Danish health authorities have, from the early start of the corona pandemic, emphasised politics over professionalism. Previously I described how the responsibility for the scandal will be difficult to place, and that those involved are thus relatively well-protected against negative consequences and possible criminal charges because of their participation. Furthermore, the industry is owned by the same company-rich elite, regardless of which industry we are talking about. As long as there are pandemics, crises and wars, this elite makes a lot of money at the expense of the world's population. The corruption works so subtly in todayâs Danish politics that the parties to the shady ventures do not even need to exchange suspicious thick envelopes containing large banknotes under mahogany tables. With a barely concealed ironic allusion to my previous section on the mobile networks, the described corruption can be called a type of corruption (almost second-generation corruption, if you like) where the envelopes of money may be the original first-generation corruption. Second-generation corruption is a much more subtle corruption, which I believe to be a prevailing form of corruption that is increasingly now taking place in Denmark. With regards to prime minister Mette Frederiksenâs and the then minister of health and the elderly Magnus Heunicke's roles in this case, I will return to this at the end of the next chapter.
When I touch on corruption, the pandemic and the WHO, I must also address Bill Gates' involvement in the WHO. This is because it is a deeply fascist form of corruption that is unfolding before our noses of all of us when a single person has so much power over the entire world's population. Fascism is precisely when the two factors, the political power and the economic power of industry, are mixed together to provide a power factor where it is the dictator, and in our case the government, who has the formal power. Even one of the foremost proponents of fascism, Italy's dictator Benito Mussolini, has stated that fascism could rightly be called 'corporatism'. In the case of Italy, it was primarily the trade unions and the opposition parties, who were forced to hand over all their power to the dictator Mussolini. On local-national plan here in Denmark, what the country has gone through since 2020 is precisely that corporatism has centred all power around the government. When the citizen finds it more and more difficult to identify where the state begins and where it ends, then it indicates that fascism is âat it againâ to get a good hold of us after World War II and an eighty-year grace-period. Mette Frederiksen stated in her New Year's speech on 1st of January 2021: "Long live research and collaboration between public and private, long live science!â
This is clearly in total support of a fascist state, but so subtly worded as to be almost oblivious to the average Dane celebrating New Year⌠It is also completely in line with the agreement that Denmark entered into with the WEF in 2018 â the âFrame Agreementâ which obliges Denmark to expand its private/public partnership. (PPP)
However, before I come back to the local Danish national level, letâs put a critial gaze upon just a few things; Corporatism, the WHO, the Pandemic and the involvement therein of a philanthropist called Bill Gates. Let us also ask the question: Who has the real power in the WHO? The top person in this organisation is the General Secretary and what do the stakeholders in the organisation expect from him? The stakeholders must be the 193/194 countries who are the members of the WHO and have outsourced parts of their health systems. They have handed the assessment of the whether or not there is a pandemic directly over to the WHO and together the decision as to how the agreement with the vaccine manufacturers activates. Here, enormous sums will change hands over a short period of time, because this is how the contracts with the pharmaceutical companies are written, most likely completely deliberately. It is unfortunately not the representatives of the countries who control the WHO in a democratic manner. Among the myriad of small and large sponsors, Bill Gates represents indisputably the largest share and therefore, by infererence, he controls the WHO. If one controls the WHO, like Bill Gates, and if you abuse this concentrated political power that one thereby has, then you also control the largest part of the world's population in the case of a declared pandemic.
This is at least until the populations wise up and cancel the contract which the 193/194 countries have signed with the WHO. Denmark became a member of the United Nations (UN) at its foundation in 1945 and then automatically de facto became a member of the WHO in 1948 when this was founded as a part of the UN. In the case of a pandemic, we can now see that the WHO has enormous influence on what is going to happen in each individual country. We also saw this in Denmark, as not one single Danish authority recommended locking Denmark down following 11th of March 2020. So therefore, we must naturally surmise that the only internal Danish organisation with enough clout was the Monarchy which gave this recommendation. Indeed, this is unlikely but not entirely impossible - except the Monarchy is not a health authority. After all, it is entirely clear and we know that neither the SSI (Medicine Institute of the State), the Health Authority or even the Medicinal Authority recommended the locking down of Denmark. So who did?
On the other hand the WHO has, since March 2020, recommended tough lock-downs and aggressive testing strategies. This was also pointed out in an article in "Berlingske" (A Danish mainstream paper) from 24th of March 2020, which has this unequivocal headline: "WHO issues warnings now: Denmark will be locked down for months without changing to aggresive testing strategy". The WHO has not had any Danish sovereign power transferred to itself as is the case with the EU. Still, mistakenly, many Danes, and politicians, have the understanding that the WHO has sovereignty over Denmark in just the same way as the EU has. However, in the case of the EU, sovereignty has been transferred legally, as the Grundlov, the Danish Constitution, prescribes. This transfer of sovereignty has even been done to such a high degree - many will despair to realise - that the EU overrules the Folketing as a law-making power in Denmark.
It is my opinion that the politicians in the Folketing, especially those with a certain degree of power, heads of parties, spokespersons, commitee chairs and of course ministers, are controlled by powers that lie in the background. Therefore I think that it is completely deliberate that the politicians seek to influence the Danes in believing that Denmark is, in legal terms, under the control of the WHO, which Denmark is not (yet). The country has never had a referendum about membership of the UN / WHO as we have had about the EU. The Grundlov clearly rules such that in paragraph 19 and 20 a referendum is required if Denmark is to hand over any kind of sovereignty. The fact is that the WHO has attemped to take the sovereignty over Denmark, and the rest of the member states, in the case when there is, once more, declared a pandemic. Well, that is another story which is important to keep an eye on. It is a subject which one of my American friends and collaborators James Roguski has invested countless hours, videos and interviews on informing us about. It is not a simple task he has undertaken, as the WHO is attempting two seperate strategies:
One is a completely new pandemic treaty and the other is legally binding additions to the existing IHR agreement which Denmark entered into in 2007. James Roguski writes very tangibly about the WHO's plans and progress on his Substack homepage. I have interviewed James Roguski several times about the WHO's plans. In the interviews James Roguski goes through how the WHO makes use of a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing IHR treaty to gain greater power over the member states.
However, let us return to Bill Gates. How can we legitimately claim that it is Bill Gates who controls the WHO? It is in fact very simple to prove for all who have access to the internet. On the website of the WHO can be found the numbers from the largest sponsors. In 2020-2021 Bill Gates donated more than 17% of WHO's entire yearly budget. In the period 2018-2019 his total donations were almost 19% and in 2016-2017 they were above 22%. This is not fiction for these figures can easily be verified by visiting the website open.who.org where you can add the donation from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation together with that from the GAVI Alliance, which is a vaccine alliance' founded and dominated by, guess who? - Bill Gates.
However, while most people are likely of the opinion that the WHO is controlled by its member states who pay donations to the organisation, the reality is that one of the world's richest, if not the richest, man has a dominating influence on the WHO as its largest sponsor. Besides which it is also worth noting that Bill Gates donated more than 22% to the organisation in the budget period when the current General Secretary Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was elected.
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher
Will Novo Nordisk be the next vaccine giant?
The Danish Ministry of Health and the Danish Corona Corruption
Let me hand you a prime example of political, possibly deeply corrupt, objectives trumping The professionalism of Danish experts and officials. This is clearly seen in the case where the Health Authority's director Søren Brostrøm is asked to put his professionalism aside, by Per Okkels who was the then Ministry of Health and the Elderly's head of department, which can also be referred to as the permanent secretary to the health minister. It was the danish tabloid newspaper Ekstra Bladet that, on the basis of a document review, was able to bring an article documenting that director Søren Brostrøm had already received an email on the 14th of March from his boss Per Okkels with apparently politically motivated instructions. The email had been written just three days after the WHO declared the corona âpandemicâ. In this email, Okkels writes about Brostrøm's statements to the press that "before you answer, you must abandon the âprinciple of proportionalityâ in recognition of an extreme precautionary principle". This email is the definitive proof that the government's, and thus the politicians', so-called âprecautionary principleâ outweighs professionalism. Below is a translated extract of the article in Ekstra Bladet printed on the 28th of May 2020:
Emails between the Director of the Danish Health Authority, Søren Brostrøm, and the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Health show a battle over testing strategy. Brostrøm was ordered to follow 'an extreme precautionary principle'
Jakob Kjellberg, professor at the Danish Centre for Social Research and Analysis (Vive), also reads the head of department's email as an unequivocal message to Brostrøm.
- Basically, he says 'test, test, test' and don't come running with all sorts of considerations about the fact that there must be a reasonable relationship between what we get out of testing and the resources that are spent on testing, says the professor, pointing out that the exchange of words exposes the disagreement between politicians and professionals. - It shows that there is a very different view of testing. It is a professional and political world that meets, he says.
By asking Søren Brostrøm to drop his principles of proportions in the testing strategy and instead go for "an extreme precautionary principle," he is at the same time forced into the Prime Minister's line.
It was exactly this âextreme precautionary principleâ that the Prime Minister had communicated at the press meeting on the 11th of March.
Put simply, the population is being (politically) misled by the ones paid to do a professional job governing the country. I believe that there is a high probability that this is a matter of subtle corruption on a political level, which is the basis for the permanent secretaryâs strong political influence mail to its director. And what is the subtlety of corruption? Not even six months after this email exchange had occurred, we are informed that Per Okkels is âretiringâ. To cap it all, we are also informed that a little later it emerges that he will stay âemployedâ in a âpart-timeâ senior advisor position at the Novo Nordisk Foundation, a foundation that distributes more than five and a half billion danish kroner per year. In other words, a very wealthy fund, from an outfit who certainly don't need to account for every penny! A company who has enough funds to pay for full-time work for a new employee every week in the executive corridor, give him a soft and comfortable office chair as well as a mahogany table and an architect-designed desk-lamp. All in order to return a lucrative industry favour.
Health Policy Journal writes on the 24th of February 2021 that Per Okkels had only âretiredâ for a little over a month before he joined the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Another one of the Ministry of Health's key employees during the corona handling also switched to Novo Nordisk at roughly the same time. This was one Thomas Senderovitz, who was the Director of the Danish Medicines Agency who, after 5 years in this hallowed position, chooses to step down and jump ship to Novo Nordisk in the midst of the corona âpandemicâ.Surprising? Well, I think so. Suspicious? Definitely! Novo Nordisk later announced that they intended to compete in the vaccine business. On the Novo Nordisk Foundationâs homepage they shared in December 2023 that the foundation would invest 1,8 billion danish kroner in the vaccine business. And that they would be doing so in collaboration with the big philanthropists Bill Gates and George Soros related companies Open Philantropy and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Just shortly after the Danish Medicinesâ Agency announced that the first COVID-19 âvaccinesâ had received approval for emergency use in Denmark, it really puzzled me that Senderovitz chose to leave his former position, one of the most important (and well paid) central official positions, right in the middle of what was declared to be the most serious threat to human life in over a hundred years - the corona âpandemicâ. If he was led by noble intentions, he would have used the opportunity to do whatever he could for his country. But he didnât.
On the 9th of March 2021, the Danish state broadcaster DR News brought us an article with the heading "Vaccine General Thomas Senderovitz stops in the middle of the rollout: 'It has not been an easy choice'â. What leadership material is this individual made of, when his love of his country (already deep in crisis) is demonstrated by abandoning the very job which is supposed to provide continuity and support to his fellow citizens? Perhaps because his love of country is - in reality - not really on his mind at all. Senderovitz is a descendant of a Jewish family that migrated to Denmark from the Ukraine in 1906 as a result of the Russian pogroms â the persecution of the Jews. Love of Denmark and the Danes? Well, Iâll leave you to come to your own conclusion over that one.
Ukraine's president since 2019, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, is a Zionist-jew who, with a starting point in his Jewish-Ukrainian ancestry, just months after Russian troops rolled in over the border, spoke to one of Israel's largest dailies about Ukraine's Zionist future as a 'Greater Israel'. Victoria Nuland, the US Under Secretary of State has, since the Maidan revolution in Ukraine in 2014, managed the events in Ukraine with a firm American-Zionist hand. Nuland (originally Nudelmann) also comes from a family that in the last century was expelled during the same persecutions of Jews in the Ukraine, which sent Senderovitz's family fleeing. There is a greater Zionist influence on the war in Ukraine, which I will return to in the chapter âYear 2022 â The Bear is coming, the bear is comingâ. In this chapter you will also learn about the Senderovitz familyâs swift and extremely successful reaction to the conflict, and how they swiftly helped a great portion of the 90.000 Ukrainians to Denmark, which were part of the first wave of refugees escaping Ukraine.
To get an impression of the golden revolving doors of politicians and civil servants, it is worth reading a danish blog by former long-serving civil servant Søren Skafte, who on 10 March 2021 wrote the post "When the head of the Danish Medicinesâ Agency transfers to the pharmaceutical manufacturer".
Søren Skafte's excellent blog entry raises a big question mark about the well-used golden revolving door between politics and the executive corridors of business. He also calls into question at the same time, although without saying so directly, whether Denmark is as free from corruption - which many Danes are proud of - and which the organisation âTransparency Internationalâ provides expressed in their measurements of how Danish corruption is perceived by the outside world. Skafte also writes: The significant career changes which Thomas Senderovitz, Friis Arne Petersen, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, Brian Mikkelsens, Nick HĂŚkkerup and others have made, should give rise to consider whether special requirements should be made for top politicians and officials who have been allowed to leave the public service bringing deep insight from Denmark's political engine room. Should there be, as exiits in a number of other countries, grace periods or "cooling off" periods instigated in these situations? It must be remembered that ânon-competeâ or NDA clauses are not uncommon in the private business world. This is a legal framework which exists prceisely so that a high-ranking employee cannot take up employment with a competitor within a given period. However, and somewhat surpsingly, Danish Ministers and other top officials are not subject to this restriction, and the jump from âSlotsholmenâ â the Danish governmentâs âsquare mileâ - can be made from one day to the next. In Denmark, the debate about competence and waiting or cooling-off periods is so low-key that it barely exists at all. Surely this tells us that Danish inscrutibility is not as it is made out to be. Despite the lucrative changes in circumstances for several key employees in the Ministry of Health, it may still seem like a bit of a flighty accusation that Novo Nordisk, the Danish Health Authority and the Danish Medicines Agency were supposed to be involved in corruption about the corona pandemic. And how could Novo Nordisk be involved when it is just one insulin manufacturer and not part of the vaccine industry at all? There are no less than two very burdensome answers to the above question. One has to do with the ownership relationships surrounding the vaccine industry, and the resulting worldwide corruption. The second is much more sinister; Novo Nordisk turns out â surprise, surprise â to be heading into the vaccine business at hypersonic speed. The vaccine industry in Denmark has been dominated, and predominately underwritten - since the sale of the SSI's (Statens Serum Institut) vaccine factory - by Bavarian Nordic with their highly questionable Ebola vaccines and renewed focus on monkeypox. Incidentally, as of May 2023, we are told, by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, that this âseriousâ disease, âMpox, formally named âMonkeypoxâ, is of so little importance that âEpidemiological updates have been discontinuedâ, only to be told in August of 2024, that a new international pandemic is underway. Oh dear. Another load of scare-tactics, misinformation and lies specifically crafted to frighten the average Mr & Mrs Average Joe all over the world.
Unfortunately, it is such that very few companies own almost everything there is to own, or have at least the largest shareholding when it comes to the ownership of them. I made a video about this in July 2021.
It would certainly seem that I was not completely wrong when I claimed in this video that three or four companies basically have a decisive influence on almost all other major companies throughout the world. This was further confirmed by editorial writer Farhad Manjoo for The New York Times when, on the 12th of May 2022, he writes an article which headlined âThree Companies Control a Piece of Nearly EverythingâŚ. Should You Worry?â Indeed it is a controversial subject that, on an ultimate financial level, there is no competition between e.g. Coca Cola and Pepsi Cola, because ultimately they have the same owners. That perhaps explains some circumstances surrounding Manjoo's article shortly after it was published. Maybe itâs possible that Farhad Manjoo's article became too hot to handle for the publisher. In any case, within a few hous of publication, the title was dumbed down to a softer and slightly less conspicuous single headline: "What BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Are Doing to the Economy". Verification of this can be obtained by visiting the Internet's memory machine "WayBack Machine" at the link in the footnotes. Incidentally, (top tip for truth-seekers) âThe WayBack Machineâ is an Internet archive where billions of internet pages are saved by internet users. For example, a newspaper article or other information cannot be found because it has been changed or moved behind a paywall, you may be lucky to stumble upon the original that another internet user has copied before it was removed, moved or otherwise changed. In this way one can also access all pages or articles that have once been on the web even if they have subsequently been changed, moved or deleted. Go to the internet address www.web.archive.org. Be aware that I have noticed that even this service are being mangled with, and some of the stored pages are unfortunately disappearing. As I recommend in the mentioned YouTube video, you can open Yahoo Finance in a browser and search under âNovo Nordiskâ. There you will see the same pattern for the Danish insulin company as you can see with Coca Cola and Pepsi Cola. Novo Nordisk is owned (as of 28th November 2022) by 1,027 different so-called Institutional Holders, the largest portfolio holders being our old friends,Vanguard and Blackrock topping the list with State Street being found a little further down. It is not difficult for the ordinary Dane to understand that it is a very real problem that so few institutional investors own such a large part of the worldâs companies, and thus the world's resources. Indeed, it can now surely also be seen as the root of the corruption I have tried to put into words in this section. If the reader wants to delve further into the subject, why not visit the website 'stopworldcontrol.com' and find the video "Monopoly - Who owns the world?". It is a video of Dutch origin that is voiced in English by Tim Gielen. The video explains in detail how big a problem it is that the majority of all successful companies are owned by the same institutional funds such as Blackrock and Vanguard. However, digging needs to be done because it is deliberately opaque as who actually manages these funds, but it is there. A particular problem surrounding BlackRock is that it also acts as an adviser to governments and central banks, and therefore sits on both sides of the table when large-scale decisions must be made. This means that they as a company can themselves benefit from their duplicity. One interesting media, Investigative Europe, has done a piece of virtuosic critical journalistic work with a few articles about BlackRock, which they have also boiled down into a short and precise video about BlackRock, the problem. In addition to the fact that Novo Nordisk is owned by the same owners who own the majority of the vaccine industry, the Novo Nordisk Foundation has established a special collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation around the development of virus control agents. Also the George Soros-controlled Open Philanthropy company is involved in this collaboration. Open Philanthropy is legally structured as a 'limited liability companyâ (LLC) but belongs to the Open Society Foundations, which is owned by the so-called âphilanthropistâ, George Soros. He is one of this world's most controversial characters, as he is accused of speculating in destabilising states with the aim of making huge sums of money for himself. The Novo Nordisk collaboration was announced on the 15th of March 2022 on the Novo Nordisk Foundation website, less than a year after Per Okkels - remember him, the once permanent secretary of the health ministry - joined the foundation.
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher
What about Health and Safety?
At a hearing in the US Congress in 2020, telecoms industry representatives admitted that not a single dollar, euro, yen or Chinese renminbi was spent on security testing this technology even though billion after billion had been spent on the technology itself. Surely this simple fact alone should set the alarm bells ringing loudly and the consequent aborting of all 5G technological progress immediately. But this simply did not happenâŚ. What did happen was that the lobbyists immediately sprang into action (funded by millions of dollars from the very same industry) obfuscating the truths and clouding the judgement of anyone who had the slightest suspicion and doubts as to the harmful effects of this technology and as to what was really going on. This is unfortunately exactly what happens when some new alarming information or a new scientific study comes to light: The alarming information is obfuscated and the danger to humans and nature is downplayed.
This is especially dangerous when we are dealing with a product over which the average person has no control. 5G is precisely that product. 5G uses stronger and higher frequencies than earlier generation networks, which further makes this whole neglect of security an even greater crime. Yes, crime; because it is a crime to subject the ordinary population to this radiation without adequate safety testing. At a hearing in the United States of America, the Senate revealed in February 2019 that the industry had not carried out any scientific studies about safety and health in connection with the new 5G network. The fact that the industry has succeeded at all in continuing the 5G rollout unhindered, is largely due to an organization called ICNIRP, which is appointed, and thus legitimised by (guess who) the WHO. The WHO is once again given legitimacy by the United Nations (UN), to which the WHO is subject. ICNIRP is the international organisation under the WHO that draws up guidelines for saftey limits and thus regulations regarding electromagnetic radiation. This includes the radiation from such devices as mobile phones, smartphones, WiFi routers, mobile masts and not least seemingly innocent consumer electronics such as baby monitors. These devices all belong to the category which can be collectively called electromagnetic radiation exuding devices. The biggest problem with ICNIRP is that they only recognise thermal hazards of electromagnetic radiation and not the biological hazards. This means that their safety guidelines, in which they indicate some limit values, only take into account that the human body must not stay heated locally more than one degree Celsius by the radiation that is emitted from a device. The ICNIRP guidelines thus ignore the dangers of your body receiving biological damage from the radiation to which the body is exposed. Indeed, it is precisely this biological damage that many scientific studies demonstrate when human tissue is exposed to electromagnetic radiation, even at levels a thousand times below the existing limit values in the ICNIRP guidelines. The knowledge I accumulated at that time about the ICNIRP guidelines, I converted at the beginning of 2020 into a number of videos in English that I posted on YouTube. I have spent a lot of time and energy researching ICNIRP and WHO and how they have acted over the years. My own research in the field does not leave me in any doubt that the people who sit in central positions in these organisations also well know about the science in this field and therefore know that electromagnetic radiation from mobile networks is much more dangerous than the organisations express. Of course, it is all down to money and the money involved in the rollout of 5G makes it impossible for any of the individuals to be honest about that and at the same time keep their jobs and careers. In other words, this is corruption at a very high level. Furthermore, because lobbyism is as massive as it is, it is difficult to have a reasonable debate on the subject without immediately being called a tin-foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist. It was something I had to experience myself when I started participating in the debate about 5G in the trade magazine Ingeniøren's online forum.
People I had never met called me all sorts of things instead of engaging in a meaningful debate on the subject. The fact is that the corrupt organisations have all the resources and know how to use them. That is why the researchers and independent private individuals, such as myself, who delve into the matter and read up on the science in the field, have very few opportunities to educate the rest of the population about what the publicised science really shows. The misinformation and the deceptions carefully prepared by the (paid) lobbyists are always what one comes across first, if you want to do your own research and get to the nub of the matter.
For example, the aforementioned ICNIRP appears as an âauthorityâ in the field of radiation, and even if you read up on their website, few people would care to investigate what industry background the ICNIRP employees have. They are all, in one way or another, paid by the industry and are in no way independent when evaluating a new scientific study e.g. about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation from the new 5G frequencies. And the scientific researchers who might just possibly produce a new radiation-critical scientific study, risk having their careers smashed by this semi-official lobbyist organisation ICNIRP, which wields far too much power. Corruption is rife, but extremely subtle, and those who are behind it, i.e. those who make money from it, namely the industry players, know fully well that they have to hide the money channels that go to those implicated organisations and the prepaid âresearchersâ involved.
Many ordinary people do not realise that the telecoms industry is part of a larger industrial area referred to as the Military Industrial Complex. Since there is so much money involved in the combined telecommunications industry and military industry, those who oppose the industry lobbyists are very tightly censored. The pattern of lobbying that I quickly identified during my investigations of 5G and the radiation area, would later prove to be repeated in other industries. Now it wasn't the case that I was the first sceptic in Denmark to start to inform people about the negative consequences of mobile phone radiation. On the contrary, there have been many who have informed on the subject, many of whom are still active, and from whom I have gained a great deal of inspiration. However, no one has done a more thorough job of informing about these problems than Eva Theilgaard Jacobsen who, in 2017 published the book, âMørkelĂŚgning af mobilstrĂĽlingens konsekvenserâ â âConcealing the consequences of mobile radiationâ. If you are interested in knowing more about mobile radiationsâ negative consequences, then this book is worth its weight in gold. It presents structured argument after argument for us as a society to stop the increasing electrosmog to which we are exposed and the book also goes into how the harmful effects appear. Futhermore, you can read how the telecommunications industry does everything it possibly can to sidetrack the authorities. It is called lobbying.
It is my impression that corruption exists in all major industries, and the more money the industry controls, the better the âqualityâ of corruption exists. Letâs not kid ourselves; Lobbying is just a fancy word for corruption. It applies both for the mobile industry in which I myself have made a (now defunct) career, as well as for virtually every other industry. For instance the pharmaceutical industry is just a few steps short of the aforementioned Military Industrial Complex when it comes to making money by corrupting politicians and industries.
This was also the case when the WHO declared the corona outbreak on 11 March 2020 as a pandemic. All the countries that have agreements with the vaccine manufacturers have committed themselves to purchase a certain amount of vaccines, and the vaccine manufacturers are guaranteed a huge income, exactly as was the case during the 2009 H1N1 âSwine fluâ pandemic. My question back in 2020 was how Danish experts from the Danish Health Authority, Statens Serum Institut and the Ministry of Health could be so blind to this corruption within the WHOâs own ranks? And what about the politicians who we are told are expressly elected so as to avoid corruption within the civil service and to oversee in the exercise of these authorities' functions? Perhaps it was because in 2020 these experts and politicians were already influenced and prepared to be part of the corruption that I believe the corona pandemic unleashed. They were involved at all levels, from politicians to the civil service and to the other authoritiesâ execution of their work. I believe that this is corruption on a grand scale that is constantly escalating in step with the fact that the populations of the world's countries do not have a proper say.
Links for this podcast episode:
* Environmental Health Trust lavede i februar 2019 en artikel om sikkerheden og sundheden ved 5G: https://ehtrust.org/health-effects-of-5g-wireless-technology-confirmed-at-us-senate-hearing-after-senator-blumenthal-questions-industry/
* ICNIRPs hjemmeside: https://www.icnirp.org
* Eva Theilgaard Jacobsens bog âMørkelĂŚgning af mobilstrĂĽlingens konsekvenserâ omtales af May-Day: https://www.mayday-info.dk/ny-bog-moerklaegning-af-mobilstraalingens-konsekvenser
* Artikel i dagbladet Information fra 2009 om korruptionen under erklĂŚringen af H1N1 for pandemi: https://www.information.dk/udland/2009/11/staerk-lobbyisme-bag-who-beslutning-massevaccination
* Politiken artikel fra juni 2010 som omtaler den udbredte korruption i WHO ifm. H1N1 skandalen: https://politiken.dk/debat/signatur/art5465051/%C3%98f-%C3%B8f-s%C3%A5dan-tjener-man-42-milliarder
Other podcast episodes:
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher
Chapter One:
The Year 2020
When the-wolf-in-sheepâs-clothings cries wolf!
Over the last three years, after the Corona pandemic, war in the Ukraine and the genocide i Palestine, many Danes have come to realise that all is not well, neither in the little duck pond, nor the greater realm. Speaking for myself, one of the things which awakened the warrior in me was, in 2020-21, the wholesome overriding of sections of the Danish constitution to make way for the âEpidemic Actâ. This was in response to actions taken by the World Health Organisation (WHO) who, on 11th March 2020, declared a worldwide pandemic based upon the corona outbreak which occurred in Wuhan, China a few months earlier. After that âpronouncementâ, things moved on at some pace. Circumstances occurring in the wider world suddenly took on greater importance to the average Dane. We were subjected to pictures of Chinese people dying in the streets of a mystery illness and rolling videos of ambulances transporting sick and dead people in Italy. The message was clear: The Danish people should officially be afraid. Very afraid!
Of course, as sure as night follows day, a group of people were found to have brought the virus home to cozy little Denmark apparently after a skiing holiday in the Alps. The story was endlessly hyped in the media resulting in a mass fear of this new disease âCoronaâ. In the period after, the media spoke of nothing else to the people of Denmark culminating in our Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen proclaiming at countless press conferences that âDenmark would never be the same country againâ.
How on Earth could she know this?
Nobody questioned this pronouncement for (nearly) all were seized with fear. Indeed, there should be no critical questions addressed at the authorities; but instead âcommunity spiritâ had to be demonstrated, a concept which the prime minister mentioned again and again at these numerous press conferences. However, I was not so easily convinced that I should fear a virus that could strike myself or my loved ones to instant death. Put another way, I did not fear corona any more than I feared the annual flu virus.
So, at the time the WHO proclaimed a pandemic - and both the Prime Minister and our Queen at press conferences instilled fear and dread to all who would listen - I was already very critical of the WHO and by the same token, I was therefore also very critical of this wholesome declaration of a âpandemicâ and thus also against what I considered the Queen's and the prime minister's fear propaganda.
The W.H.O â The big bad wolf
At the turn of the year 2019/20, I had started an information campaign about electromagnetic
radiation. I was prompted to do this by a meeting which I had with a woman on a course who told
that she was ill from electromagnetic radiation, i.e. the radiation from WiFi, mobile phones and
mobile telephone masts. As an electronics engineer who had previously worked in the mobile industry in past years my interest was pricked and I had to investigate whether she could really be right that this radiation is dangerous for people. It was at the same time as the mobile industry had started to roll out 5G mobile networks all over the world, including in Denmark.
I started to thoroughly investigate the technology, the science and the politics of this industry and I found out that it is the WHO that regulates and determines radiation safety level parameters for the telecommunications industry. Conversely, the WHO also started setting up bodies that act as lobbyist organisations for the telecoms industry, designed to ignore the factual danger of large volumes of electromagnetic radiation from mobile masts, mobile phones, WiFi and other sources of radiation, up to and including seemingly innocent products like âRingâ doorbells and baby alarms.
My own conclusion was quite clear. There are now so many convincing scientific studies that show beyond any reasonable doubt how dangerous electromagnetic radiation is for the human body. I was now in no doubt that the telecoms industry with their concerted 5G campaign, and with the help of their one-sided lobbyists had misled the population, not just in Denmark, but worldwide.
The industry in which I myself had made a career was now responsible for the population being used as Guinea pigs in a huge scientific experiment â namely the rollout of the next generation of mobile networks, dubbed 5G. As I said, I am a fully qualified electronics engineer and have worked with a variety of mobile telecommunication products. In the six years from 1996-2002 I was working for Ericsson. This Swedish company was then the worldâs largest telecommunications company and employed approximately 120,000 people worldwide, and even to this day is still one of the largest companies in its field. As the head of a technical department in the Middle East, I had product and support responsibility for Ericssonâs mobile data products through large parts of the region. The technology at the time used in these mobile networks was called GSM and later named â2Gâ a denominator for the second generation mobile network. During my last months at Ericsson I was involved in selling 3G to local customers in the Middle East. Even at that time, I remember that there were already plans afoot for 4G and 5G and I found it somewhat Utopian that there already existed a road-map for the new technologies which had not even been developed, but I confess that I didnât really give it much thought at the time.
A few years later from 2010 to 2012 I worked again with the mobile industry; this time, as a sales engineer for the company ACTE, a Nordic wholesale electronic components distributor. I was responsible for selling mobile 2G, 3G and 4G modules to the Danish electronics industry. This time, instead of working with the actual telecom networks, it was the Siemens spin-off company Cinterion, which made up the majority of the mobile products in the product portfolio for which I was responsible. From this experience, I have a technical and professional background in the industry and its technical aspects being fully conversant with mobile products right to the core of their operation. From this I can explain that a 2G network is called 'GSM' (or CDMA in North America), the core of a 3G network is called 'UMTS' (or CDMA2000 in North America), and 4G is referred to as 'LTE'.
A 5G network has a different distributed structure than the 2G, 3G and 4G systems. With 5G the physical core structure of the network consists of a network of ultra high capacity fibre cables instead of actual ânewâ technology. The new technology itself sits in the extremely advanced 5G nodes at the end of the core fibre network. Therefore, there is no special designation for the core network in 5G, making it distinct from the older systems of generational mobile networks. This is because the powerful 5G network hubs, or nodes, contain basically all technical aspects of the network. In the older systems the telephone exchange switching technology and the controlling of the radio base stations are separate nodes, whereas everything is combined in the 5G nodes. This is fundamentally different to the way in which the previous iterations of 2G, 3G and 4G operate.
At this point, it is therefore important to understand that the telecommunications companies misled the population when, in 2020 they made press releases proclaiming the rollout of 5G in Denmark. There was not actually an existing â5Gâ network in place in Denmark in 2020 to rollout the 5G technology and it was âmisleadingâ of the companies to say that they had a working âfifth generation networkâ at all. The mere fact that the powerful fibre network was not in place makes it impossible for the 5G network to operate as such. Of course, what we actually had, and what the telecoms companies persuaded us to accept, was an âupgradedâ 4G network which embraced new antenna technology providing a 10-fold increase in data speed to the consumer over the existing 4G network. What we actually got in 2020 was extra technology advances of the 4G network and not 5G at all. The network rollout should have been dubbed 4G+ or 4.5G. Indeed, we found that the Danish telecom network operators like TDC, Telia and Hutchison 3G (normally referred to as â3â) had rolled out antenna and radio base station upgrades for 4G, not 5G!
My description here is somewhat a simplification of reality. In essence, true to the reality was that the telecoms companies oversold their rollout of 5G, as this rollout had very little to do with a new generational telecom network. Jumping on the bandwagon, were the mobile phone manufacturers â Apple, Samsung, LG, Huawei etc. who all puffed their chests out propagating their 5G products which werenât in fact 5G at all, but only 4G+. These manufacturers knew very well that the 5G network was not in place and furthermore mislead the consumer (already eager to lap up the new technology) into thinking that it was. The consumer was treated to âdemonstrationsâ of this ânewâ technology. For example the Danish Engineers Trade Magazine (Ingeniørnes Fagblad) published an article describing how TDC were testing 5G in Elsinore (the home of Shakespeare's Hamlet) in December 2019. The only problem was that it was not 5G that was tested! All that was really presented for the consumers was a demonstration of an upgrade to the existing 4G network, which achieved an increase of the possible achieved data speed.
So, in a rather general and simplified way, the telecoms industry can be divided into three groups; the infrastructure producers, the smartphone producers and the telecommunications companies who sell mobile subscriptions to end users. Without labouring the point, all three groups misled their customers â the gullible Mr & Mrs Public - when they told the entire outside world that their consumers were now using the 5G network. Because, as I just have said above; there is no 5G network in place. At least there wasn't in 2020.
At this juncture, the public must now surely and immediately ask themselves the following question: Why would the telecoms industry mislead, or letâs not be coy here, LIE to them, the general population and their customers about 5G? It is difficult to answer and therefore also difficult to pass on the answer to others. However, I think that there are several different reasons as to why the truth is not told. The easy explanation is that the telecoms have found a yet another new way to make money, and are eager to cash in. I certainly have no doubt that the industry is very conscious of what they are doing, and therefore I also have a suggestion for a second answer, which may not necessarily be the definitive and 100% correct answer. When the industry now knows, via the many thousands of scientific studies that exist in this area that mobile radiation is as dangerous as it is, and at the same time they are facing their biggest golden opportunity in the entire history of the same industry, then that industry has to think creatively. Therefore, the industry started to develop a 5G technology in parallel with developing a strategy to downplay the criticism and ignore the harmful effects of the technology. Basically, if you like, they refused to examine or pay any credence to the negative consequences of this strategy. So the more the industry can misinform us about 5G, the greater the chances that we as a population do not ask too many sharp questions about it. Questions like why the telecommunications companies participate silently in the process of installing the perfect surveillance system. Because that's what the real 5G is! It is a network where everything is fully monitored twenty-four hours a day and it is conceivable that a government body or a private company could use the network as a weapon against the population. Let's hope there's never anyone who feels like doing that but I want the reader to know that it is now beyond any doubt that the possibility exists.
Links for this podcast episode:
* Mobile operator TDC testing 5G in Elsinore, Denmark: https://ing.dk/artikel/skov-hav-bakker-helsingoer-aabner-testomraade-5g-230863
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe -
The Danish Illusion
A book written by Flemming Blicher
FOREWORD
'Once upon a time'âŚ.these are three little words which make me think of two great and very prolific Danes, both of whom happen to be authors. One is known country-wide, yeah even world-wide, and has been loved by the Danish people, and of course by people abroad, for his amazing fairy tales. The other is hated by the Danish power elite and so far, he is only known to a very small group of Danes. This group does not see this author as a writer of fairy tales, but as an important historian who bravely and unselfishly has made himself as unpopular with the elite, as the little boy, who boldly proclaims that âthe emperor has no clothes on.' I think there is a good chance that he, before too long, also will be known country-wide, and maybe even loved, as much as the old author of fairy tales. Furthermore, I fervently believe he is one of Denmark's few real patriots.
His name is Martin Tidsvilde and he is an author and historian, who often makes use of the fairy tales of Hans Christian Andersen to illustrate the emerging real history of Denmark which he has discovered. It would not be an exaggeration to call his writing controversial â indeed, there are not many Danish books as controversial as his!
What makes them controversial is his claims about how power and rule is exercised in Denmark and how this power has developed since 1849 when King Frederik the 7th granted Denmark its first constitution, the socalled âGrundlovâ. Tidsvilde is of the opinion that the official power never left the monarchy and to prove his claim, he has the text in Denmark's current constitution, which became applicable on the 5th of June 1953. This is in black and white, written in the Constitution, that the king has the exercising power in Denmark and, at the same time the king shares the legislative power with the Danish parliament, the âFolketingâ.
According to the law of succession within the Danish monarchy, passed on the same date as the Constitution came into place, the throne must be passed down to a son or daughter of the reigning king. This means that, when it is written âthe King' in the Constitution it may as well mean 'the Queen'. Whilst it would seem that all Danes assume that Denmark's king is just a figure head with a rubber stamp, without any real influence on the exercise of power in Denmark, Tidsvilde claims the opposite; that the king does not only have the official power, he also exercises his power actively, and yet so subtly that the secret is well kept.
And these are controversial claims. It is understandable that many Danes do not at all feel like occupying their thoughts with Tidsvilde's statements, for this simple reason: It is easier to allow oneself to be lied to than it is to acknowledge that you have actually been lied to all your life. And when all Danes, like the subjects in The Emperor's New Clothes (the famous fairy tale by H.C. Andersen) are of the common conviction that the emperor truly has his fancy clothes on, then why waste precious energy on the opposite claim?
This, I think, is the main reason why so far only a small group of Danes have taken interest in Martin Tidsvilde's writing. It is my recommendation to everyone who really takes an interest in Denmark and the future of Denmark, to at least read âThe paragraphs of power â the history of Denmarks Constitutionâ, which is his first book in his trilogy about the Constituation.
When I decided to write about the Danish illusion I also decided to split my writings into several books. This is the first of these books. The successive books are called The 3 Fictions and The Freethinkers. This should not leave the reader in any doubt about my own conviction, which is that Danes are not especially well-informed about the true circumstances of the Danish state, and certainly their place within it.
So, I share Martin Tidsvilde's opinion that Danes have been put into a very dense fog regarding the Denmark in which they live and this is what I wish to make clear with these books. The reality which most Danes perceive about Denmark is an illusion, which can easily be taken apart. When Danes finally embark upon their own journey of discovery, many of the well-regarded institutions of the Danish society simply fall to the ground. The first to fall are especially Danish democracy, the Danish legal system and the Danish financial welfare state. This is completely common with the Danish people's perception of these three âgolden eggs' and the warm self-satisfied glow of Danish virtuosity of being 'the role model of the world'. I will make use of these three so challenged areas as the basis with which to describe the three fictions: The democratic fiction, the legal fiction and the financial fiction.
Whilst this book is meant to help the reader get to the point where they are prepared to view the world a little more in black and white, my following books will expand on this basic premise considerably. The reader will see the gradual unveiling of the world just as I have experienced it during the three years until I published this book in Danish in the spring of 2023. It was during these three years that I experienced the three fictions. I hope that I will succeed in telling the story in such a way that the reader will feel entertained and at the same time will obtain a good insight into my experiences. I want to warn you that this is not for the faint hearted and let me also add that the difference between âillusionâ and 'fiction' may seem trivial. So, in explanation, I mean that as the author, I have decided that the three 'fictions' is the best way to describe the overall illusion.
When one writes so bluntly, which I began to do in 2023, it is, at the same time, important for me not to patronise the reader and also the remaining Danish, and World population. I also do not wish to 'thumb down' the country which, up until now, has given me so much for all my life. I love the Danish people and I love Denmark. However, it is expressly because of this love that I feel moved to write this book so as to attempt to influence the future of this country for the better and to give our future generations even more incentive to get out of bed in the morning.
Up until the end of 2019 I was still convinced that Denmark had an amazing democracy and comprehensive and effective legal institutions and I was also proud of the Danish economic model and that Denmark was a shining light for the rest of the world to strive toward.
Here at the beginning of 2023, I do not believe it is too late for Denmark to transform into a real role model for the rest of the world. However, it is not really about Denmark, the country. Indeed, Denmark is just an area within borders drawn by our predecessors and to a great degree Denmark is a conveniently constructed enclave. Right now I am in Hellerup - a suburb of Copenhagen - and less than twenty-five kilometres due east, separated by a small patch of water, people call themselves Swedes and live under different rules than I do. How can it be that the dotted line cutting through the Ăresund straight, causing a sharp separation of people, is perceived as the most natural thing in the world? It is really just a line that can be seen on a man-made map. This reminds me about the situation after the fall of the Berlin wall; even though it had physically disappeared, the wall still existed in the minds of the Berlin population. The fact that it still existed in Berliners' minds still influenced their actions every day. The Berlin wall remained as an illusion of the past, although it had physically been torn down!
Therefore this book is not about Denmark, the country. It is about you and me and everybody else in this country â and in the rest of the world. What do we want from life and what do we want to pass on to the next generations?
This book has been written with a critical gaze on the existing institution of power in Denmark. The critique is especially trying to reveal that Danish people are not being told the truth about this institution of power, but they are being misguidedly led to believe that there are no better ways of governing Denmark.
Even though I forcefully argue against the existing institution of power in Denmark, the reader should not regard this book as an attempt to provide better solutions. This is not the intention with this book, neither with the second book, nor the third. The intention is to bring the Danes together around what is really going on in their little duck pond. When Danish people have acquired a better understanding of what is really going on, I am sure that the population will want to take part in the parliamentary process of how to best govern this country to the benefit of all. Neither myself, nor any of the organisational initiatives in which I am involved are to have any special influence on defining the future of our country. This is something we need to do together - all of us, the people. Denmark, and an eventual Danish state, or whatever you will call the governing system, must be by the people, for the people. Today, unfortunately, it looks like the attitude of the governing institution is that the people exist only to serve the state.
When the Danish people are rid of indoctrination and can see the state of affairs for what they really are, then I will assume that the people will want to take part in forming the government of the future Denmark. It must be a process which will take some time and which cannot and must not be pushed.
I am very aware that the battle in Denmark is closely connected with the battle for justice in most of the other nations and populations around the world, if not the entire World.
The closest I get to suggesting solutions to the challenges of government in this book are when I touch upon subjects like decentralisation of power, direct democracy/people rule and, of course, the term 'natural law'.
I am of the opinion that we need to take the opposite direction as opposed to where Denmark is headed right now. Instead of centralisation of power, which is happening at speed today, we must undergo a radical decentralisation of power, so that the people can again feel that they are themselves the society in which they live. They need far more direct access to take part in decision-making about their society, and especially about their local community and their local area in which they live and work.
Likewise I have the opinion that the Danes, as well as all other modern populations around the world, must rediscover nature's own laws instead of having the attitude that the modern human being ranks far above what is natural. By 'natural law' I do not mean such laws which recent Danish Governments seek to pass new versions of, where rewilding and fencing off nature are focal points. This is an utterly crazy project controlled directly by the power machine and yet another symptom of the inexorable march of ruling politics.
Natural Law, seen in human and societal context, means that we respect all living things in the universe and that we experience ourselves as inseparable parts of our surroundings. One would therefore never feel the need to harm other living beings, either physically or mentally. Instead, one would always seek to heal the wounds which are constantly inflicted in our world, and always to live in the greatest possible harmony with our surroundings and the whole universe, whatever form that might have. Should it happen, that one did break the laws of nature and any man-made laws founded thereon, one should be tried by a people's jury. Here the term 'common law' is drawn in and you will also be able to read a little about that in this book and the succeeding book.
However, as previously mentioned, before we can even begin to discuss solutions, we need to be much more in agreement about what the true state of Denmark currently is. Therefore this book is about lifting the scales from the eyes as we Danes, and indeed all humans on Earth, gradually come to realise the illusion that we have been lulled to sleep with â the illusion about Denmark and other Western nations as role models for the rest of the world.
When the book was published in Danish I decided to supply it with the subtitle "The Three Lost Years". This can sound quite negative. What Denmark and the rest of the World have gone through during the three years from 2020 to 2023 is not without some gain, for "what is outwardly lost must be gained inwardly". It has, for example, become very clear during the past three years, that Denmark is not the country we thought it was, and that an illusion about Denmark exists, and this illusion is also in existence in all other countries. This book is about how I discovered this illusion. I hope that this book will help you to see the illusion clearly and I wish you a gratifying experience while you are reading it!
Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe
