Nieuws – Finland – Nieuwe podcasts
-
The Pacific Street Boys catch up over hot takes and cold beers.
-
Every now and then, the internet gods bless us with a meme so bizarre, so unexpected, and so hilarious, it stops us mid-scroll and makes us wonder: how did we get here? Enter: the Henry Danger meme. Yes, Henry Danger, the Nickelodeon show about a 13-year-old boy who becomes the sidekick to a superhero named Captain Man, has suddenly found itself at the center of meme culture. While the show ended back in 2020, its most unexpected twist has come from the viral sensation that is sweeping Twitter, TikTok, and meme pages everywhere. For those unfamiliar with the plot of Henry Danger (don’t worry, it’s okay), the show follows young Henry Hart, who becomes the apprentice to Captain Man, a superhero with indestructible powers. With a goofy premise and kid-friendly antics, no one could have predicted that, years after its finale, Henry Danger would become internet gold. But here we are. What’s the Meme? It all started with a Twitter user who posted a clip from Henry Danger, and honestly, it’s the kind of random TV moment that was bound to become a meme at some point. In the scene, Captain Man (played by Cooper Barnes) is aggressively shouting, eyes bulging with exaggerated emotions, while Henry (played by Jace Norman) reacts in the most nonchalant, straight-faced way possible, as if he’s used to his boss’s dramatic outbursts. It's the perfect contrast between a man taking himself way too seriously and a kid who couldn’t care less. The key moment? Captain Man dramatically yelling, “This is where it ends!” while Henry stands there, barely even blinking, seemingly wondering when lunch is. Twitter users pounced on this perfect gem of overacting-meets-apathy and turned it into a format for every situation. Need a relatable way to show how you handle your boss’s passive-aggressive emails? Use Henry’s deadpan face. Want to sum up how it feels to attend yet another meeting that could’ve been an email? Captain Man yelling at a completely unfazed Henry is your go-to. Meme Culture’s Love for the Ridiculous One of the reasons this meme has taken off so quickly is because it plays into the absurdity of everyday life. We’ve all been in situations where someone is far more invested in something than we are, and that feeling of, “Why are you so worked up about this?” resonates with a deeply ingrained part of human experience. From school to work to relationships, we encounter our fair share of dramatic people—and sometimes, we’re just too tired or disinterested to give them the reaction they’re looking for. Henry’s blank stare at Captain Man's theatrics is the internet personified. In an era of over-stimulation, Henry’s reaction is the vibe. How It’s Being Used One of the funniest things about the Henry Danger meme is its sheer versatility. Just about any situation can be thrown into the Captain Man-Henry dynamic: Your friend losing their mind over spilled coffee: Captain Man’s intensity is your pal’s reaction, while Henry’s blank face is your unbothered attitude as you sip your iced latte. Dealing with life crises: Whether it's a looming deadline or a parent’s dramatic reaction to a minor inconvenience, the Henry Danger meme is perfect for capturing how we all feel sometimes. Life is Captain Man—loud, insistent, and overly serious—while we just sit there, Henry-style, staring it down with the emotional investment of a houseplant. The most viral posts so far have involved Henry Danger being transformed into a multi-purpose meme for work struggles, existential crises, and everyday annoyances. The format has also branched out into other universes—yes, there are now mashups involving Marvel characters, SpongeBob, and even scenes from The Office. Anything, apparently, can fit the Henry Danger model of yelling vs. indifference. Captain Man: The Internet’s New Reluctant Star Let’s take a moment to appreciate Captain Man, played by Cooper Barnes, for his unintended contribution to meme culture. For years, he was known as the larger-than-life superhero who commanded attention with every exaggerated gesture, scowl, and intense speech. Now, that same over-the-top style has made him the face of everyone who takes themselves way too seriously. Barnes has a background in comedy, so perhaps it’s only fitting that his most viral moment would come from his character’s wild dramatics. While Henry Danger was always meant to be a slapstick comedy for kids, it’s finding a second life in an unexpected place—millennial and Gen Z meme culture. What better way for a Nickelodeon superhero to go out? Gen Z and Millennials Love a Good Juxtaposition One of the most entertaining aspects of meme culture is its ability to find humor in contrasts. The Henry Danger meme fits perfectly into that mold. The loud, intense, exaggerated Captain Man is the antithesis of today’s "I can’t be bothered" energy. Millennials and Gen Z have turned apathy into an art form, and nothing sums that up quite like Henry’s blank, deadpan stare. It's an anti-reaction in a world full of overreactions. Gen Z, in particular, is notorious for its embrace of irony and deadpan humor. Just look at the rise of TikTok and how young creators lean into the ridiculousness of everyday life with nonchalance. The Henry Danger meme is the ultimate expression of this: it’s not that we don’t care; it’s that we care so little it’s almost impressive. Memes Give Shows a Second Life What’s fascinating about the internet’s relationship with TV is how older, even forgotten shows can find new life through memes. Shows like Friends and The Office have become mainstays in meme culture, decades after they originally aired. Now, it seems Henry Danger is getting the same treatment. Though it wasn’t designed to have the kind of mainstream adult appeal of some other sitcoms, Henry Danger’s newfound status as a meme-worthy show has brought it back into the public consciousness, reintroducing it to audiences who may have never given it a second glance. Nickelodeon execs, take note: your next big hit could be hiding in your old archives. The Internet’s Power to Make Anything Hilarious In the end, the Henry Danger meme serves as another reminder of how meme culture works: it’s unpredictable, lightning-fast, and full of random selections from the deep, dusty corners of the internet. If you had asked anyone two years ago whether Captain Man screaming into the void while Henry Hart looks bored would become the internet’s favorite way to express the absurdity of modern life, they’d have laughed you out of the room. Yet, here we are. The internet does what it wants, and right now, it wants Henry Danger. So, what’s next for Henry Danger? Could we see a meme crossover with SpongeBob, or will TikTok start lip-syncing to Captain Man’s dramatic lines in unexpected places? Whatever happens, it’s clear that this is one meme that has cemented itself as a beloved moment of randomness in 2024. Thanks for listening and remember to like and share wherever you get your podcasts.
-
New podcast 2 Latinas from DFW discussing current events as well as True Crime days
-
Thought provoking discussion on the state of the black race and possible ways to regain what is a law of nature.Self preservation..
-
Have you heard the news? The PressPectives Podcast features conversations at the intersection of technology and publishing. Host Ruairí Doyle welcomes guests from the world of publishing and media for insightful deep dives into topics impacting the way we share stories. Whether you’re an industry pro, a curious learner or just looking for some inspiration, you’re in the right place.
-
Social Justice through Shared Experience, Strength, and Hope
-
Moro! Aamupodi perkaa viikon kiinnostavimmat uutiset ja puheenaiheet perjantaisin. Näkökulma on vahvasti Tampereella ja Pirkanmaalla. Kuuntele, niin pysyt kartalla! Keskustelua vetävät Aamulehden uutispäällikkö Saara Tunturi ja liven ja kuvan päällikkö Tuukka Välimäki. Studiossa vierailevat Aamulehden journalistit.
-
Epoch Times Podcasty o dôležitých témach Slovenska. Prihláste sa k odberu a nenechajte si ujsť dôležité informácie.
-
In the mood to think about Politics, Philosophy or International Relations? Well...think poLit! The poLit podcast provides short episodes that are analytical and yet easy to understand, encouraging an original and erudite mode of political thinking that crosses disciplines. With me, Kieran O'Meara, and guest academics as your guide, we will try to navigate these odd political times together. Check out the website at: http://www.thinkpolit.com/
Samples are taken from nonprofit, institutional or governmental public domain access bodies, or those that permit with an attribution, such as C-SPAN. -
Overview of the European Parliament’s agenda
The Plenary Round-Up gives an overview of the most important information from the latest plenary session.
This podcast is based on the European Parliamentary Research Service briefing prepared after each plenary session.
You can listen to more podcasts on Europarl Radio, the web radio of the European Parliament.
-
Part 1: The History and Impact of the Klamath River Dams Less than a month after the removal of four massive dams along the Klamath River, salmon are returning to their ancestral spawning grounds for the first time in decades. This moment marks a significant turning point in both ecological restoration and cultural revival, offering a glimpse of what nature can achieve when freed from human-made barriers. To understand the importance of this event, it’s essential to look back at the history of the Klamath River, the impact of the dams, and the long road to their removal. The Klamath River, which stretches over 250 miles from southern Oregon to northern California, was once one of the most productive salmon fisheries on the Pacific Coast. Indigenous peoples, including the Yurok, Karuk, and Hoopa Valley Tribes, relied on the river not just for sustenance but also for cultural and spiritual practices. The river's annual salmon runs were deeply embedded in their traditions, symbolizing renewal and abundance. For millennia, the river served as a lifeline, sustaining both the natural ecosystem and the human communities living along its banks. In the early 20th century, this harmony was disrupted by the construction of a series of dams on the Klamath River. The dams, built primarily for hydroelectric power, irrigation, and flood control, drastically altered the river’s flow and accessibility. They created barriers that blocked salmon from reaching their upstream spawning grounds, leading to a sharp decline in fish populations. Over time, the once-abundant salmon runs became a shadow of their former selves, devastating not only the river’s ecology but also the cultural practices of the Indigenous tribes who depended on them. The environmental impact of the dams extended beyond the salmon. Stagnant reservoirs behind the dams became breeding grounds for toxic algae blooms, further degrading water quality. Sediment, which would naturally flow downstream to replenish habitats, accumulated behind the dams, depriving the riverbed of essential nutrients. These changes rippled through the entire ecosystem, affecting everything from aquatic insects to birds and mammals reliant on the river. For the Indigenous tribes, the dams represented more than an ecological catastrophe; they were a direct assault on their way of life. Fishing rights, already under threat from decades of settler expansion and environmental degradation, were further eroded. The river that had once been central to their culture and survival was now a site of conflict and loss. The tribes’ connection to the salmon was not merely practical; it was deeply spiritual, rooted in ceremonies and oral histories that tied their identity to the river’s cycles. The history of the Klamath River dams is also a story of shifting priorities and conflicts between stakeholders. Farmers and ranchers in the region benefited from irrigation systems made possible by the dams, while hydroelectric power provided energy to local communities. However, these benefits came at the expense of the river’s health and the rights of the tribes. Over the decades, the competing interests of conservationists, Indigenous groups, farmers, and energy companies created a complex web of challenges that seemed impossible to untangle. By the late 20th century, it became clear that the status quo was unsustainable. Salmon populations had plummeted to critically low levels, threatening the survival of species like the Chinook and coho salmon, as well as the communities that depended on them. Indigenous leaders, scientists, and environmentalists began advocating for the removal of the dams as a necessary step to restore the river’s health. This advocacy would span decades, involving legal battles, scientific research, and painstaking negotiations among stakeholders. The removal of the Klamath River dams, completed in late 2024, represents the culmination of these efforts. It is the largest dam removal project in U.S. history, both in terms of scale and significance. The project has not only reconnected the river’s natural flow but also set a powerful precedent for balancing human development with ecological restoration. Less than a month after the dams came down, the return of hundreds of salmon to upstream waters offered a striking validation of the decision to prioritize nature’s resilience. This achievement is a testament to the power of collaboration and the determination of those who fought for the river’s restoration. The history of the Klamath River dams, while fraught with challenges, is now being rewritten as a story of hope and renewal. The return of the salmon is a reminder that even the most damaged ecosystems can heal when given the chance, and that the ties between humans and the natural world are both enduring and essential.
Part 2: The Immediate Ecological and Cultural Impacts of Salmon Returning to the Klamath River Less than a month after the removal of the four dams on the Klamath River, the sight of hundreds of salmon making their way upstream has reignited hope for the river’s ecological and cultural revival. These fish, which had been cut off from their ancestral spawning grounds for decades, symbolize the resilience of nature and the potential for ecosystems to recover when freed from human-made barriers. The immediate return of the salmon offers a striking demonstration of the interconnectedness of ecological health, cultural heritage, and the enduring power of collaborative advocacy. Salmon are keystone species, meaning their presence—or absence—has a profound effect on the ecosystems they inhabit. For salmon, access to cool, oxygen-rich streams for spawning is essential for their survival. Historically, the Klamath River’s tributaries provided ideal conditions for salmon runs, which were among the largest on the West Coast. However, the construction of dams fundamentally disrupted this life cycle. Blocked from their spawning grounds, salmon populations dwindled, with some species, such as the coho salmon, nearing extinction. The removal of the Klamath River dams has restored access to over 400 miles of upstream habitat, giving salmon an opportunity to complete their natural migration for the first time in over a century. Biologists monitoring the river have described the return of the salmon as nothing short of miraculous. Within weeks, hundreds of fish were observed navigating upstream, an instinctual journey that had been blocked for generations. These salmon are now spawning in cool creeks that had remained out of reach for decades, contributing to the revival of an ecosystem that depends on their presence. The impact of the salmon’s return extends far beyond the fish themselves. Salmon play a critical role in nutrient cycling, transporting marine-derived nutrients from the ocean to freshwater ecosystems. When salmon spawn and die, their bodies decompose, enriching the soil and water with nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients. This nutrient transfer supports the growth of aquatic plants, feeds insects, and benefits other wildlife, from bears to eagles, that rely on salmon as a food source. The renewed presence of salmon in the Klamath River is already beginning to invigorate this nutrient cycle, setting the stage for a broader ecological recovery. The cultural significance of the salmon’s return is equally profound. For the Yurok, Karuk, and Hoopa Valley Tribes, whose histories and traditions are deeply tied to the Klamath River, the return of the salmon represents the healing of a spiritual wound. Salmon are not merely a food source for these tribes; they are a central figure in their cosmologies, ceremonies, and ways of life. The annual salmon runs, once a time of communal harvests and celebration, were disrupted by the dams, leaving a void in the cultural fabric of these communities. The sight of salmon reclaiming their ancestral waters has brought a sense of renewal and pride to tribal members who have fought tirelessly for this moment. For many, it is a reminder of the resilience of their culture and the enduring connection between their people and the river. Tribal leaders have described the salmon’s return as a victory for Indigenous rights and environmental justice, underscoring the importance of restoring not just ecosystems but also the cultural and spiritual bonds that define their communities. The immediate success of the dam removal project has also highlighted the power of collaboration between Indigenous tribes, environmentalists, and government agencies. This partnership was instrumental in overcoming the significant challenges involved in removing the dams, from navigating regulatory hurdles to addressing the concerns of local farmers and residents. The return of the salmon serves as a validation of this collaborative approach, demonstrating that even seemingly insurmountable ecological problems can be addressed when diverse stakeholders work together. Despite these early successes, the road to full recovery is still long. Sediment released from behind the dams must settle and stabilize, and water temperatures, which have been affected by years of disruption, need time to return to optimal conditions. Monitoring and supporting the salmon populations as they reestablish themselves will be critical to ensuring their long-term survival. Climate change, with its potential to warm water temperatures and alter precipitation patterns, poses an additional challenge. However, the salmon’s rapid response to the dam removal offers hope that nature, when given the chance, can adapt and thrive. For those witnessing the salmon’s return, the moment is a powerful reminder of the enduring connection between humans and the natural world. The fish, which have overcome immense barriers to reclaim their ancestral waters, serve as a symbol of resilience and renewal. Their journey upstream is not just a biological event but a profound statement about the possibility of h -
Agentic discussions of issues in Central Asia
-
In the annals of Hollywood history, few names carry the weight of legacy quite like Lon Chaney Jr. Born into the shadow of his legendary father, Lon Chaney Sr., the younger Chaney carved out his own niche in the world of cinema, becoming an icon of horror in his own right. His journey from reluctant actor to beloved monster portrayer is a tale of perseverance, talent, and the complex dynamics of family and fame in the golden age of Hollywood. Born Creighton Tull Chaney on February 10, 1906, in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, the future Lon Chaney Jr. entered a world where his father was already making a name for himself in vaudeville and silent films. Creighton's early years were far from stable. His parents' marriage was tumultuous, marked by his mother Cleva's alcoholism and eventual attempted suicide in 1913. This event led to his parents' divorce and young Creighton being shuffled between various relatives and boarding schools. Despite the instability of his childhood, Creighton maintained a close relationship with his father. Lon Sr., known as "The Man of a Thousand Faces" for his remarkable makeup and character acting skills, was determined that his son would not follow in his footsteps. He wanted Creighton to have a more stable, conventional life than the uncertain world of show business could offer. As a result, Creighton was actively discouraged from pursuing acting and instead was guided towards more practical pursuits. Following his father's wishes, Creighton attended business school and worked a variety of jobs in his young adulthood. He served as a plumber's apprentice, worked at a meat-packing plant, and even had a stint as a farm hand. These experiences, while far from the glamour of Hollywood, would later inform his portrayals of working-class characters and contribute to his reputation as a relatable, down-to-earth figure despite his famous lineage. However, the lure of Hollywood proved too strong to resist. In the late 1920s, Creighton began to take on small, often uncredited roles in films. He was careful to use his birth name rather than his father's famous surname, determined to make his own way without trading on the Chaney name. This period of his career was marked by struggle and anonymity, a sharp contrast to the fame and success his father was enjoying. Lon Chaney Sr.'s untimely death in 1930 marked a turning point in Creighton's life and career. The loss of his father was a personal tragedy, but it also removed the main obstacle to Creighton pursuing acting full-time. In the years following his father's death, Creighton's roles began to grow in size and importance, though true stardom still eluded him. It was in 1935 that Creighton Chaney became Lon Chaney Jr., a change that would alter the course of his career. The name change was suggested by producer Maurice Pivar as a marketing tactic, capitalizing on the enduring fame of the elder Chaney. While the younger Chaney was initially reluctant, concerned about the inevitable comparisons to his father, he eventually agreed. The decision proved to be a double-edged sword, opening doors but also creating expectations that would haunt him throughout his career. Chaney Jr.'s breakthrough role came in 1939 with his portrayal of Lennie Small in the film adaptation of John Steinbeck's "Of Mice and Men." His performance as the gentle giant with a mental disability showcased his acting abilities beyond mere name recognition. The role earned him critical acclaim and demonstrated that he was more than capable of carrying a film on his own merits. This success in a serious dramatic role seemed to point towards a career path distinct from his father's legacy in horror and character roles. However, fate and Hollywood typecasting had other plans. In 1941, Chaney Jr. was cast as Larry Talbot, the tragic protagonist of "The Wolf Man." This role would define the rest of his career and cement his place in horror film history. Chaney Jr.'s portrayal of the tormented Talbot, cursed to become a werewolf, resonated with audiences. He brought a sympathetic quality to the monster, much as his father had done with characters like Quasimodo and the Phantom of the Opera. The success of "The Wolf Man" led to Chaney Jr. becoming Universal Studios' go-to monster actor. Over the next decade, he would portray not only the Wolf Man in various sequels but also Frankenstein's monster, Dracula, and the Mummy. This versatility in monster roles echoed his father's chameleon-like ability to transform into various characters, though achieved through different means. Where Lon Sr. was known for his elaborate makeup techniques, Lon Jr.'s transformations were more often the work of the studio's makeup artists. Chaney Jr.'s most frequent and beloved monster role remained the Wolf Man. He portrayed Larry Talbot in five films, including various monster mash-up movies that pitted Universal's creatures against each other. His consistent portrayal of Talbot as a tragic figure, tormented by his curse and seeking release, added depth to what could have been a one-note monster character. Chaney Jr. often remarked that he felt a personal connection to Talbot, understanding the character's inner turmoil and loneliness. While his horror roles brought him fame and a dedicated fan base, they also led to typecasting that frustrated Chaney Jr. throughout his career. He longed to be taken seriously as a dramatic actor, to build on the promise he had shown in "Of Mice and Men." However, opportunities for such roles were few and far between. When they did come, such as his role in the 1952 western "High Noon," Chaney Jr. proved that he was capable of holding his own alongside major stars like Gary Cooper. Despite his frustrations with typecasting, Chaney Jr. maintained a prolific career throughout the 1940s and 1950s. He worked consistently in films and, as the film industry began to change, transitioned into television work. He appeared in numerous TV shows, including westerns like "Rawhide" and "The Texan," as well as thriller series like "Alfred Hitchcock Presents." One of the most interesting phases of Chaney Jr.'s later career was his work with director Fred Zinnemann. In addition to "High Noon," Chaney Jr. appeared in Zinnemann's "Teresa" (1951) and "Member of the Wedding" (1952). These films provided him with the opportunity to play more nuanced, dramatic roles, showcasing a talent that was often overlooked due to his association with horror films. Chaney Jr.'s personal life was as complex as his professional one. He was married twice, first to Dorothy Hinckley from 1928 to 1937, with whom he had two sons, and then to Patsy Beck from 1937 until his death. His relationship with alcohol was a recurring struggle throughout his life, echoing his mother's battles with alcoholism and affecting both his personal relationships and his professional reputation. As he aged, Chaney Jr. continued to work, though the quality of productions often declined. He appeared in numerous low-budget horror and science fiction films throughout the 1960s and early 1970s. While these films were far from the prestige of Universal's golden age of horror, they allowed Chaney Jr. to continue working and maintained his connection with horror fans. One of the most poignant aspects of Chaney Jr.'s later career was his relationship with the legacy of his father. Throughout his life, he struggled with comparisons to Lon Sr., often feeling that he could never quite live up to the towering reputation of "The Man of a Thousand Faces." However, as he aged, Chaney Jr. seemed to find a measure of peace with his place in Hollywood history. He became more comfortable discussing his father in interviews and even appeared in the 1957 biopic "Man of a Thousand Faces," playing a studio makeup artist opposite James Cagney's portrayal of Lon Chaney Sr. Chaney Jr.'s final film appearance was in the 1971 horror film "Dracula vs. Frankenstein," a low-budget production that was a far cry from the Universal classics of his heyday. His health had declined significantly by this point, affected by years of heavy drinking and the physical toll of his acting career. He died on July 12, 1973, in San Clemente, California, from heart failure at the age of 67. In the years since his death, Lon Chaney Jr.'s legacy has been reevaluated and celebrated by film historians and horror enthusiasts. While he may not have achieved the critical acclaim or versatility of his father, Chaney Jr. made an indelible mark on the horror genre. His portrayal of Larry Talbot/The Wolf Man, in particular, stands as one of the great sympathetic monster performances in cinema history. Chaney Jr.'s impact extends beyond his individual performances. He was part of a transitional period in horror cinema, bridging the gap between the gothic monsters of Universal's golden age and the more modern, psychological horrors that would emerge in the 1960s and 1970s. His Wolf Man, with its themes of inner turmoil and the beast within, presaged later explorations of the monster as a metaphor for human struggles. Moreover, Chaney Jr.'s career serves as a fascinating case study in the complexities of Hollywood fame and legacy. His journey from reluctant actor to horror icon, always in the shadow of his famous father, reflects the unique pressures faced by children of celebrities. His struggles with typecasting and his desire to be seen as more than just a monster actor echo the challenges faced by many actors who find success in genre roles. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in Chaney Jr.'s work beyond his monster roles. Film scholars have revisited his dramatic performances, particularly in "Of Mice and Men" and his collaborations with Fred Zinnemann, leading to a more nuanced appreciation of his abilities as an actor. These reappraisals have helped to round out the public's understanding of Chaney Jr., showcasing him as more than just the son of a famous father or a one-note monster
-
René van Leeuwen (DumpertReeten) en Erik-Jan Rosendahl (SLAM) bespreken iedere week de gekste filmpjes van Dumpert en leukste headlines uit het nieuws.
-
Iltalehden uudessa Kuka minä olen -podcastissa politiikasta tutut nimet kertovat avoimesti elämästään ja avaavat itsestään täysin uusia puolia. Millainen ihminen on julkisuudessa nähtävän poliitikkoroolin takana? Miksi he tekevät sellaista politiikkaa kuin tekevät? Millaisia haaveita heillä on?
Toimittaja: Marko-Oskari Lehtonen
Tuotanto ja leikkaus: Riikka Nyman -
Weekly PodCast featuring an interview with a guest who has made a friendship/relationship across political lines. Visit https://www.etsy.com/shop/askmeaboutmyhat/ to get your hat!
-
A deep dive into the human rights issues affecting humanity. Pulling from my experience as a human rights lawyer—I bring the receipts to disentangle fact from fiction and advance the fight for universal human rights.
www.qasimrashid.com -
The podcast that discusses world complexities with women experts!
Our host Ilana Bet-El welcomes one or two women experts for an informal conversation to explain, analyse, discuss and highlight events of the day by an array of wonderfully qualified women from all around the world.
Contribute to the conversation or share your topic wishes with a comment & a 5-⭐️Reach us on our Instagram and follow for updates @women_leaders_podcastProudly partnered with European Leadership Network, Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and websiteSupported by a grant from the Foundation Open Society Institute in cooperation with the Open Society FoundationsHosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
-
Täällä voit tutustua Suomen Kuvalehden juttuihin. Lehden tilaajana voit kuunnella kaikki jutut.
-
Podcast, jossa nuoret saavat äänensä kuuluville politiikan ja yhteiskunnan keskusteluissa.
Juontajat Eemeli Tuominen ja Ilari Huitti tuovat esiin nuorten näkökulmia, käsittelevät ajankohtaisia teemoja ja keskustelevat vaihtuvien vieraiden kanssa aiheista, jotka koskettavat erityisesti nuorta sukupolvea.
Tavoitteenamme on tarjota foorumi, jossa rohkeat ajatukset ja tuoreet näkökulmat pääsevät esille. Liity mukaan matkallemme ja anna nuorten äänen inspiroida myös sinua!
Palautteet, jaksoideat ja yhteistyöehdotukset Instagramin DM tai sähköpostiin [email protected] - Laat meer zien
