Afleveringen
-
Our dive into the sick and twisted underbelly of Epstein's decades long crime spree continues in this episode as we look at the courts order to remand Jeffrey Epstein to custody after his arrest.
(commercial at 8:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-berman.pdf (courthousenews.com) -
Our dive into the sick and twisted underbelly of Epstein's decades long crime spree continues in this episode as we look at the courts order to remand Jeffrey Epstein to custody after his arrest.
(commercial at 9:11)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-berman.pdf (courthousenews.com) -
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
Our dive into the sick and twisted underbelly of Epstein's decades long crime spree continues in this episode as we look at the courts order to remand Jeffrey Epstein to custody after his arrest.
(commercial at 9:11)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-berman.pdf (courthousenews.com) -
Our dive into the sick and twisted underbelly of Epstein's decades long crime spree continues in this episode as we look at the courts order to remand Jeffrey Epstein to custody after his arrest.
(commercial at 9:03)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-berman.pdf (courthousenews.com) -
The trial of Karen Read, accused of murdering her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, ended in a mistrial on June 28, 2024. The jury, after five days and approximately 20 hours of deliberations, remained deadlocked and unable to reach a unanimous verdict. This led Judge Beverly Cannone to declare a mistrial. The case has been marked by intense scrutiny and controversy, raising questions about whether the state will pursue a retrial or seek new evidence to continue the legal proceedings
Karen Read's defense argued she had no motive and suggested alternative theories for O'Keefe's death, including an accidental fall or being hit by another vehicle. The prosecution, however, presented evidence they claimed showed Read was responsible for his death. The mistrial leaves the case unresolved, with significant public interest in the next steps the state will take.
The Commonwealth has indictated that they will re-try the case, although that has not been etched in stone yet.
(commercial at 10:48)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Karen Read murder trial: Mistrial declared after jury deadlocks and an investigator is relieved of duty | CNN -
n February 2024, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed HB 117, which allows for the release of grand jury documents from the 2006 investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. This legislation permits the disclosure of grand jury testimony if the subject of the inquiry is deceased, the investigation was about sexual activity with a minor, and the testimony was previously disclosed by a court order.
The bill, effective July 1, 2024, aims to provide transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims by revealing previously sealed grand jury proceedings. This move has been celebrated by victims and advocates as a significant step toward accountability and justice.
Epstein's 2006 investigation involved the Palm Beach Police Department, which had recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with a minor and lewd or lascivious molestation. However, the State Attorney at the time chose to present the evidence to a grand jury, resulting in the details and names of those involved remaining sealed.
HB 117's passage was supported by two of Epstein's victims, who joined Governor DeSantis in Palm Beach to mark the occasion. Governor DeSantis emphasized that the public deserves to know who participated in Epstein’s sex trafficking and that wealth and status should not protect individuals from facing justice. Representative Peggy Gossett-Seidman also highlighted the significance of this legislation for the victims and the Palm Beach community that suffered from Epstein's actions.
And now those documents are available for us to dive into.
(commercial at 10:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud
If you'd like to help support the podcast:
Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com) -
n February 2024, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed HB 117, which allows for the release of grand jury documents from the 2006 investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. This legislation permits the disclosure of grand jury testimony if the subject of the inquiry is deceased, the investigation was about sexual activity with a minor, and the testimony was previously disclosed by a court order.
The bill, effective July 1, 2024, aims to provide transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims by revealing previously sealed grand jury proceedings. This move has been celebrated by victims and advocates as a significant step toward accountability and justice.
Epstein's 2006 investigation involved the Palm Beach Police Department, which had recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with a minor and lewd or lascivious molestation. However, the State Attorney at the time chose to present the evidence to a grand jury, resulting in the details and names of those involved remaining sealed.
HB 117's passage was supported by two of Epstein's victims, who joined Governor DeSantis in Palm Beach to mark the occasion. Governor DeSantis emphasized that the public deserves to know who participated in Epstein’s sex trafficking and that wealth and status should not protect individuals from facing justice. Representative Peggy Gossett-Seidman also highlighted the significance of this legislation for the victims and the Palm Beach community that suffered from Epstein's actions.
And now those documents are available for us to dive into.
(commercial at 10:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud
If you'd like to help support the podcast:
Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com) -
n February 2024, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed HB 117, which allows for the release of grand jury documents from the 2006 investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. This legislation permits the disclosure of grand jury testimony if the subject of the inquiry is deceased, the investigation was about sexual activity with a minor, and the testimony was previously disclosed by a court order.
The bill, effective July 1, 2024, aims to provide transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims by revealing previously sealed grand jury proceedings. This move has been celebrated by victims and advocates as a significant step toward accountability and justice.
Epstein's 2006 investigation involved the Palm Beach Police Department, which had recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with a minor and lewd or lascivious molestation. However, the State Attorney at the time chose to present the evidence to a grand jury, resulting in the details and names of those involved remaining sealed.
HB 117's passage was supported by two of Epstein's victims, who joined Governor DeSantis in Palm Beach to mark the occasion. Governor DeSantis emphasized that the public deserves to know who participated in Epstein’s sex trafficking and that wealth and status should not protect individuals from facing justice. Representative Peggy Gossett-Seidman also highlighted the significance of this legislation for the victims and the Palm Beach community that suffered from Epstein's actions.
And now those documents are available for us to dive into.
(commercial at 7:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud
If you'd like to help support the podcast:
Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com) -
n February 2024, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed HB 117, which allows for the release of grand jury documents from the 2006 investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. This legislation permits the disclosure of grand jury testimony if the subject of the inquiry is deceased, the investigation was about sexual activity with a minor, and the testimony was previously disclosed by a court order.
The bill, effective July 1, 2024, aims to provide transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims by revealing previously sealed grand jury proceedings. This move has been celebrated by victims and advocates as a significant step toward accountability and justice.
Epstein's 2006 investigation involved the Palm Beach Police Department, which had recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with a minor and lewd or lascivious molestation. However, the State Attorney at the time chose to present the evidence to a grand jury, resulting in the details and names of those involved remaining sealed.
HB 117's passage was supported by two of Epstein's victims, who joined Governor DeSantis in Palm Beach to mark the occasion. Governor DeSantis emphasized that the public deserves to know who participated in Epstein’s sex trafficking and that wealth and status should not protect individuals from facing justice. Representative Peggy Gossett-Seidman also highlighted the significance of this legislation for the victims and the Palm Beach community that suffered from Epstein's actions.
And now those documents are available for us to dive into.
(commercial at 7:33)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud
If you'd like to help support the podcast:
Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com) -
Sandra Birchmore was a young woman from Stoughton, Massachusetts, who was reportedly groomed and sexually abused by three former police officers from her teenage years until her death in 2021. The alleged abuse began when she was 15 and continued for nearly a decade. Birchmore's family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against these officers, the Stoughton Police Department, and the town, accusing them of a scheme of grooming and repeated sexual assaults. The lawsuit claims that one of the officers, Matthew Farwell, was the last person to see her alive and is believed to be the father of her unborn child.
In this episode, we begin our deep dive into her tragic story.
(commercial at 15:13)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Massachusetts Superior Courts Judge Brian A. Davis' Amended Decision and Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Norfolk County, 2282CV01197) - DocumentCloud -
Rex Heuermann, the man suspected of being the Long Island Serial Killer was originally charged with three murders at the time of his arrest but the authorities told us then that a fourth murder chage was pending.
In this episode, the hammer drops on Rex Heuermann as he gets smashed with his fourth murder charge after DNA that was found on the body of Maureen Brainard-Barnes was traced back to Heuermann's daughter, who was 13 at the time.
(commercial at 10:23)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Gilgo Beach serial killer: Why DNA from suspect Rex Heuermann's daughter matters | Fox News -
The accusations against Diddy and those close to him keep coming in and this time, a woman is claiming that she was abused by Justin Combs while working aboard a Yacht that was chartered by his father Sean "Diddy" Combs who is also facing similar allegations from multiple accusers.
Justin Combs and Diddy continue to maintain their innocence and no charges have been filed and no arrests have been made.
(commercial at 9:32)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' son Christian Combs accused of sex assault in lawsuit (nbcnews.com) -
Carlee Russell, the woman who faked her own kidnapping in Alabama will avoid spending time in jail for the hoax. Instead, she was hit with a fine and her sentence was suspended.
In this episode, we get a look at the latest developments and and discuss if the punishment was fitting of the crime.
(commercial at 7:48)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Carlee Russell avoids jail time, must pay $17K fine (lawandcrime.com) -
Cell phone records can be invaluable tools for investigators in solving crimes. Here's how they can be used:
Location Tracking: Cell phone records often contain information about the locations where calls or text messages were made. This data can help investigators establish the movements of suspects or victims before, during, and after a crime occurred. This can be particularly useful in cases such as kidnappings, where tracking the movement of a suspect's phone can lead to finding the victim.Call Detail Records (CDRs): Call Detail Records provide information such as the phone numbers involved in a call, the duration of the call, and the timestamps. Analyzing these records can help investigators identify connections between individuals, track down potential witnesses, or establish alibis.Text Message Content: While not always available due to privacy concerns, the content of text messages can provide crucial evidence in a case. Text messages may contain incriminating evidence, threats, or plans related to the crime.Cell Tower Data: Cell tower records can provide information about which cell towers a phone connected to during a specific time frame. This can help investigators narrow down the geographic area where a suspect was located at a given time.Subscriber Information: Cell phone records also include subscriber information, such as the name, address, and account details associated with the phone number. This information can help investigators identify suspects or persons of interest.Timeline Reconstruction: By analyzing cell phone records in conjunction with other evidence, investigators can reconstruct timelines of events leading up to and following a crime. This can help establish the sequence of events and corroborate witness testimony.Overall, cell phone records can play a crucial role in providing leads, establishing timelines, and gathering evidence in criminal investigations. However, it's essential to balance the use of this information with privacy concerns and legal requirements, such as obtaining proper warrants or court orders.
In this episode we take a look at the new claims about cell phone evidence no longer existing and how that might impact things moving forward.
(commercial at 7:15)
to conatct me:
[email protected]
source:
Cell Phone Evidence a Hang Up in Gilgo Beach Serial Killer Case (longislandpress.com) -
The Karen Read trial is set to kick off today and there are still many, many questions that must be answered and a lot of that is due to the lack of transparancy that we have seen from the authorities due to several factors, such as Mass. state law when it comes to autopsy results being released.
Due to the lack of transparancy, a fertile ground has developed for all sorts of conspiracy theories to thrive and have led to a circus like atmosphere.
So, how does a lack of transparancy cause chaos?
Transparency in criminal trials serves multiple vital purposes in ensuring justice is fair, impartial, and accountable. Here's why it's crucial:
Public Confidence: Transparency fosters trust in the judicial system. When proceedings are open to the public, it demonstrates that justice is being administered fairly and impartially. Citizens are more likely to have faith in the outcomes of trials when they can observe the process.Accountability: Openness holds both the judiciary and law enforcement accountable for their actions. When trials are transparent, it becomes more difficult for authorities to abuse power or engage in corrupt practices. Knowing that their actions are subject to public scrutiny can act as a deterrent against misconduct.Preventing Injustice: Transparency helps prevent miscarriages of justice. When trials are conducted in the open, it allows for greater scrutiny of evidence, procedures, and decisions. This scrutiny can help identify errors or biases that may have otherwise gone unnoticed, potentially preventing wrongful convictions.Education and Understanding: Open trials provide an educational opportunity for the public to understand the legal process. By witnessing courtroom procedures firsthand, citizens can gain insight into how the law operates and how decisions are made. This promotes civic engagement and a better-informed citizenry.Deterrence of Conspiracy Theories: When the state operates with transparency, there's less room for speculation and conspiracy theories to take hold. When information is withheld or proceedings are conducted in secret, it can fuel mistrust and skepticism. Conspiracy theories often thrive in environments where there is a perceived lack of transparency or accountability.A lack of transparency from the state can indeed fuel conspiracy theories and rumors for several reasons:
Speculation: When information is not readily available, people may speculate about what is being concealed and why. This speculation can give rise to unfounded theories and rumors as individuals attempt to fill in the gaps with their own interpretations.Mistrust: A lack of transparency erodes trust in the authorities and the judicial system. When people feel that information is being withheld or manipulated, they are more likely to question the legitimacy of official explanations and entertain alternative, often more sensational, narratives.Confirmation Bias: In the absence of transparent information, individuals may be more inclined to believe information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or suspicions, even if it lacks evidence or credibility. This confirmation bias can contribute to the spread of conspiracy theories.Credibility of Institutions: When institutions fail to operate transparently, their credibility is undermined. This loss of credibility can make people more receptive to alternative explanations, including conspiracy theories, which purport to offer hidden truths that mainstream institutions are unwilling or unable to provide.
(commercial at 11:52)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
A key piece of the Karen Read case remains a mystery due to Mass. law: the autopsy report (msn.com) -
When a prosecutor seeks to limit the alibi of a suspect, it means they are attempting to challenge or restrict the evidence or testimony that supports the suspect's claim of innocence. An alibi is a defense strategy in which the accused asserts that they were somewhere else at the time the crime was committed, thus making it impossible for them to have committed the offense.Here's a breakdown of what it typically entails:
Investigation of the Alibi: The prosecutor may investigate the alibi thoroughly to determine its validity. This may involve interviewing witnesses, examining physical evidence, reviewing surveillance footage, or obtaining records that could corroborate or refute the alibi.Challenging the Alibi: If the prosecutor believes the alibi is weak or fabricated, they may seek to challenge it during the trial. This could involve presenting contradictory evidence, questioning the credibility of alibi witnesses, or arguing that the suspect had the opportunity to commit the crime despite the alibi.Motion to Limit or Exclude Alibi Evidence: In some cases, the prosecutor may file a motion to limit or exclude certain aspects of the alibi evidence from being presented in court. This could be based on legal grounds such as relevance, reliability, or procedural rules. For example, if the alibi witness has a history of dishonesty or bias, the prosecutor may argue that their testimony should be excluded.Pretrial Hearing: The judge may hold a pretrial hearing to consider the prosecutor's motion to limit the alibi evidence. Both the defense and the prosecution would have the opportunity to present arguments and evidence supporting their positions.Ruling by the Judge: The judge will make a decision based on the arguments presented and applicable legal standards. If the judge grants the prosecutor's motion, certain aspects of the alibi evidence may be restricted or excluded from the trial. If the motion is denied, the defense will be allowed to present the alibi evidence to the jury.
In this episode, we head back up to Idaho to check in on the Bryan Kohberger trial and the battle over his alibi that continues to rage inside of the courtroom.
(commercial at 8:41)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Attorneys in Idaho student homicides argue for pretrial wins | Idaho Statesman -
Sandra Birchmore was a young woman from Stoughton, Massachusetts, who was reportedly groomed and sexually abused by three former police officers from her teenage years until her death in 2021. The alleged abuse began when she was 15 and continued for nearly a decade. Birchmore's family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against these officers, the Stoughton Police Department, and the town, accusing them of a scheme of grooming and repeated sexual assaults. The lawsuit claims that one of the officers, Matthew Farwell, was the last person to see her alive and is believed to be the father of her unborn child.
In this episode, we begin our deep dive into her tragic story.
(commercial at 10:36)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Massachusetts Superior Courts Judge Brian A. Davis' Amended Decision and Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Norfolk County, 2282CV01197) - DocumentCloud -
Sandra Birchmore was a young woman from Stoughton, Massachusetts, who was reportedly groomed and sexually abused by three former police officers from her teenage years until her death in 2021. The alleged abuse began when she was 15 and continued for nearly a decade. Birchmore's family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against these officers, the Stoughton Police Department, and the town, accusing them of a scheme of grooming and repeated sexual assaults. The lawsuit claims that one of the officers, Matthew Farwell, was the last person to see her alive and is believed to be the father of her unborn child.
In this episode, we begin our deep dive into her tragic story.
(commercial at 9:13)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Massachusetts Superior Courts Judge Brian A. Davis' Amended Decision and Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Norfolk County, 2282CV01197) - DocumentCloud -
The trafficking of weapons meant for warzones often involves complex networks of arms dealers, corrupt officials, and organized crime groups. Here's a summary of how this process generally unfolds:Acquisition
Conflict Zones: Weapons are initially acquired from conflict zones, where they are often plentiful due to ongoing wars or civil unrest.Military Surplus: Arms dealers obtain surplus weapons from military stockpiles. These might be obsolete or excess to the needs of the armed forces.Black Market: Weapons can also be sourced from the black market, where they are sold illegally by corrupt military personnel or officials.Transportation
Smuggling Routes: Arms dealers use established smuggling routes to transport weapons. These routes often overlap with those used for drug trafficking.Bribes and Corruption: Bribes are paid to corrupt border officials, customs agents, and police to facilitate the smooth transit of weapons across borders.Disguised Shipments: Weapons are hidden in shipments of legal goods, such as food or machinery, to avoid detection.Distribution
Criminal Networks: Weapons are sold to organized crime groups, gangs, or other non-state actors. These groups use their existing distribution networks to move the weapons further.Drug Cartels: Arms dealers often trade weapons directly for drugs. This is particularly common in regions where drug cartels operate, as they have both the resources and the demand for firearms.Barter System: In some cases, weapons are bartered for other illicit goods or services, including drugs, making it a mutually beneficial exchange for both parties.Final Sale or Trade
End Users: The end users of these trafficked weapons can range from gang members and drug cartels to terrorist organizations and insurgent groups.Profit Generation: The sale or trade of weapons for drugs allows arms dealers to profit significantly, which they reinvest into further illegal activities.Market Dynamics: The illicit arms market is influenced by supply and demand. As conflicts flare up or as the need for drugs increases, the trafficking patterns and prices fluctuate accordingly.Impact
Violence and Instability: The influx of trafficked weapons exacerbates violence and instability in both conflict zones and areas plagued by drug-related crime.Enforcement Challenges: Law enforcement agencies face significant challenges in tracking and intercepting these illegal arms due to the sophisticated methods used by traffickers.
About a year ago we were having the discussion about MANPADS and other shoulder fired systems falling into the hands of the cartels and the legacy media was quick to deny it. Well, like usual, it would seem as if the legacy media wasn't exactly telling you the truth. So in this episode, we are going to swim through the muck and find some clarity.
(commercial at 12:59)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Mexican cartels boast of increased firepower, including U.S. weapons (usatoday.com) -
Trooper Michael Proctor has critically compromised the Massachusetts case against Karen Read through several key actions and revelations:
Unprofessional Conduct: Proctor's derogatory text messages about Karen Read, where he referred to her using offensive terms, were exposed in court. This unprofessional behavior has cast doubt on his objectivity and integrity as the lead investigator.Damaged Credibility: Proctor's credibility took a significant hit as his inappropriate comments and conduct were revealed. His texts included derogatory terms and unprofessional remarks about Read, which have been perceived as bias and a lack of professionalism.Questionable Investigation Practices: Defense attorneys highlighted Proctor's mishandling of the investigation, suggesting that his personal biases may have influenced the investigation's integrity. This has raised concerns about whether all evidence was collected and presented impartially.Impact on Jury Perception: Legal experts believe that Proctor's testimony and conduct have been extraordinarily damaging to the prosecution. The jury might now question the reliability of the investigation and the evidence presented by the state.Defense Advantage: The defense has effectively used Proctor's conduct to cast doubt on the prosecution's case. This has bolstered their argument that the investigation was flawed and biased, potentially leading the jury to consider alternate scenarios.These factors collectively undermine the prosecution's case, creating significant challenges for the state in securing a conviction against Karen Read. The defense's strategy has been strengthened by Proctor's actions, casting a shadow over the entire investigative process.
(commercial at 17:48)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Karen Read murder trial: Messy investigation in exposes problems with police work that public rarely sees, experts say (nbcnews.com) - Laat meer zien
