Afleveringen

  • You can now follow Faces Behind Papers on Instagram and Bluesky! Feel free to spread it to students or early career researchers who might be interested in psychological research!

    In this episode my guest is Prof. Katie Hoemann. She is an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Kansas. Her research focuses on relationship between language, the perception and experience of emotion.

    With a diverse educational background in the social sciences and a return to academia after a break, it is inspiring to hear the story of a researcher who took the road less traveled.

    01:02 - How was your journey from cultural anthropology and linguistics to psychology?

    03:44 - Emotions as we study them vs. as we experience them.

    06:39 - Was finding your focus of research smooth or messy sometimes?

    08:31 - Was there a specific moment when you realized you were on the right path?

    09:55 - Would you say that your diverse educational background make your academic work more meaningful?

    14:12 - Transition from non-academic work (project management) to academia.

    16:34 - which research questions are you trying to answer/explore right now?

    19:34 - if you had all the funding and resources in the world, what would you try to answer or explore?

    22:38 - What do you think makes a good psychology study?

    26:19 - Academia in the US vs. Europe

    30:57 - Who is your favourite researcher? Someone you look up to?

    35: 39 - Who is Katie Hoemann besides her academic work?

    38:01 - How do you hope people will remember you?

  • From the people who shaped Prof. Hopwood’s journey to his thoughts on therapeutic orientations, this interview was one of those where I didn’t even notice how time flew by. I might be a bit biased, since I’ve been reading Prof. Hopwood’s work since the start of my PhD, but I hope you enjoy it as much as I did!

    In case you're interested in specific parts, you can skip to them directly here:

    00:52 - What sparked his interest in psychology?

    05:37 - A foot in both camps: research and clinical work

    07:07 - Therapy orientations: it's a waste of time to compare them, says Prof. Hopwood

    10: 08 - What drives research? Curiosity, easing mental suffering, or something else?

    11:36 - Four people who shaped Prof. Hopwood’s academic journey

    13:38 - Writing papers with your partner: what’s that like?

    15:16 - From existential questions after getting a tenure to his research on human-animal relationships and sustainability

    17:46 - Future directions in his research

    20:16 - Tables are turned: a bit about my (Rana's) PhD research

    23:51 - Prof. Hopwood and I ask each other: If we had all the funding and resources in the world, what would we explore?

    27:44 - What makes a great psychology study?: "There comes a time in one's career when one has to have kind of integrity about their own work"

    31:51 - Comparing academia: US vs. Europe

    36:25 - Going back to your PhD years with the current experiences you have right now, is there anything that you wish you had done differently?

    38:18 - Who is Christopher Hopwood outside of academia? - Family, family, arts, sport, and the pleasure of work

    40:25 - How do we hope to be remembered?

  • Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?

    Klik hier om de feed te vernieuwen.

  • Hi everyone, after a break, we are back with the new episode of Faces Behind Papers. In this episode, my guest was Prof. Benjamin Scott. He is an assistant professor of neuroscience at Boston University. It was refreshing and inspiring the chat with a researcher who is genuinely passionate about exploring the neural basis of cognition and complex behavior. I hope you enjoy our conversation!

    If you're interested specific parts of the podcast, you can skip to those parts here:

    00:48 Choosing academia

    02:20 Challenges along the way

    04:34 What drew you to neuroscience

    06:56 Investigating the neural basis of decision making

    07:51 What excites you the most about your research field?

    11:35 If you had all the funding and resources in the world, what would you try toexplore?

    12:28 How do you think academia changed over the years?

    14:55 Anyone you look up to within academia?

    18:07 Typical day at work

    19:31 Recommended paper: Transcriptomic diversity of celltypes across the adult human brain | Science

    21:00 Advice to students interested in research

  • Hi everyone, in this episode my guest is Dr. Sara Bartels. She is a post-doctoral researcher at Karolinska Institute, Sweden. Her work focuses on the development, evaluation, and implementation of a digital behavioral health treatment for individuals with chronic pain. She is also currently a part of the HOMEDEM consortium which aims to support people with dementia and their caregiversusing digital interventions. It was enjoyable to interview a researcher who appreciates all aspects of her job from designing and evaluating interventions to mentoring students.

    If you're interested in specific parts, you can directly skip to them:

    01:00 – How long have you been in academia?

    01:55 – Before choosing research what were the other options you were considering? What drewyou to research?

    05:14 – Journey in research field: Digital interventions for individuals with chronic pain and dementia

    06:20 – Digital interventions using Acceptance Commitment Therapy

    09:26 – What research questions are you currently trying to answer?

    HOMEDEM Consortium: supporting people withdementia and their caregivers using blended care

    18:00 – Is there anyone that you look up to in academia?

    20:07 – How is postdoc life different from PhD life?

    23:10 – Typical day of a postdoc

    24:30 – What do you most enjoy and find it challenging about your job?

    25:40 – Learning from students

    27:46 – A paper for people interested in complex interventions: A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance30:40 – Advice for PhD students: Being proactive

  • In this episode, my guest is Assoc. Prof. Venus Mahmoodi. She is an associate professor at Columbia University Medical Center (CUIMC), Clinical Researcher at the Early N3 Lab at CUIMC, and also directs the Muslim Perinatal Lab at Teachers College, Columbia University. From her multiple positions as a researcher and a clinical psychologist, and from how she talks about her research with a great sense of humor in the interview, you can tell that she is genuinely passionate about her work and looking for ways to be helpful to people through her research and clinical work. I can assure you that the interview is worth the 50 minutes!

    If you’re interested in specific parts, you can skip to them directly here:

    01:10 Choosing academia

    05:00 First interest in research

    07:15 Clinical Practice and going into research

    11:50 Interest in Muslim mental health and challenges in early career

    19:50 Current research questions

    33:50 Balancing multiple roles

    37:55 Joys and challenges in research and clinical work

    42:40 Article suggestions for those interested in perinatal mental health

    See here!

    Biological and Psychosocial Predictors of Postpartum Depression: Systematic Review and Call for Integration: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659274/ Heterogeneity of postpartum depression: a latent class analysis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800818/.

    45:05 Advice for graduate students

  • In this episode, my guest is Prof. Tom Beckers. He is a professor of psychology at KU Leuven. His work focuses on the role of learning and memory in psychopathology, especially anxiety, addiction, and ADHD. As you will hear in the interview, he often emphasizes reflecting on one’s values when doing science and making thosevalues a priority. He is passionate about his work and a really good communicator of it. I hope you’ll enjoy this episode as much as I did!

    If you’re interested in specific parts, you can skip to them directly here:

    01:00 Years in academia

    01:20 Did you choose academia or did academia choose you? Neither.

    06:10 Journey in his research field

    8:30 Current research questions

    13:00 New directions: Pavlovian compensation

    17:30 Inspirations when doing research and finding new research questions

    19:30 The biggest changes in academia: the good and the bad

    25:30 Advice for young scientists

    27:00 People in academia that he looks up to

    28:00 Importance of “no egos” in science

    32:50 Typical week of an academic

    36:40 Four Loko Effect

  • In this episode, my guest is Prof. Selin Kesebir. She is an associate professor of organizational behavior at London Business School. She has been very interested in science, reading, and writing since her childhood, and still, as you will hear in the interview, she likes to talk with statistics and scientific findings. I hope you’ll enjoy our conversation!

    If you are interested in specific parts, you can skip to them directly here:

    00:36 Years in academia

    01:10 Choosing academia

    03:38 Transitioning to psychology from another degree

    04:50 Family influence on career choice

    07:16 Journey in the field of interest

    10:20 Business school

    13:42 Current research on narcissism

    20:13 Changes in academia

    24:28 Favorite researchers

    33:00 Advice to Bachelor and Masters students interested in academia

    37:20 Advice to PhD students

    If you have any comments or suggestions, feel free to let me know via this email: ranabegumkalkan@gmail.com.

  • In this very first episode, I hosted my supervisor Prof. Peter Kuppens. He is an affective scientist at the Catholic University of Leuven. His work focuses on theories of emotions and affect dynamics.

    I asked him some questions about his academic journey, his opinions about academia, his work schedule, and so on…

    Beyond his impressive research record, as you will hear in the interview, he comes off as a laid-back person with a positive and flexible attitude toward his work (I’m not the person to judge but that’s the impression I had).

    He also suggested a paper to anyone interested in his research field. You can find it here: (PDF) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion | James Russell - Academia.edu

    If you are interested in specific questions, you can skip to them directly here:

    01:06 How long have you been in academia ?

    01:47 Before choosing academia what were the other options you were considering? Was it your dream job?

    06:10 How has been your journey so far, in terms of your field of interest? Did you more or less stay in the same broad topic? Did you have a radical shift?

    10:55 What research question are you currently trying to answer/explore? Why is this problem important?

    13:27 If you had all the funding and resources in the world, what would you try to answer/explore?

    17:35 How do you think academia has changed over the years? Are there any areas that you think should be improved: for example, quality of articles, grant proposals or the funding process, psychology education.

    21:11 Who is your favorite researcher? Is there anyone in academia that you look up to?

    24:34 What is your typical day and week like? Overall how much time do you spend on research, teaching, and administrative things?

    27:50 What do you enjoy most about your job and what do you least like about it?

    34:23 Any advice to bachelor and master’s students who want to stay in academia? Any advice to PhD students?

  • Hi everyone, I'm Rana. In this podcast, I'm asking academics in psychology about their journey in academia, work-life, and some other questions not directly related to their research... The aim is to go beyond their research and put a face (in this case, a voice) and a story to the names you see on scientific papers. Hope you'll enjoy it!