Afleveringen
-
[youtube:6pEjV5l82uU]
You're paying for social, paid ads, SEO, a website redo, and an email tool, and you still can't tell which one actually brought you a customer. It feels like lighting money on fire, and every vendor swears their piece is the one that's working. Kim and I are on Milestone 14, the user journey and what a customer actually costs to acquire, and the unlock is Kim's reframe: your journey isn't one funnel. Every entry point, a podcast, a trade show, a referral, is its own lane to the same city, and each one drops someone off in a different psychological state, so the next step has to match the exit.
We get into starting at the bookends (re-engage your dormant database for fast revenue while you build top-of-funnel reach), judging a channel on a three-month trend instead of one bad month, and the ownership move underneath all of it: decide what percentage of gross profit you're willing to spend to acquire a customer, then make sales and marketing one revenue engine that lives inside that number. Back at Imaging Path, we knew 33 percent of our cold-call leads closed every single month, and we took that to the bank for twenty years. That is what this milestone is chasing.
This is a Ryan and Kim teaching episode, continuing Module 5 (Predictable Revenue). Ep. 499 opened the module with the revenue architecture (Milestone 13, the ICP and positioning). This one is the next milestone: the user journey and what it costs to acquire a customer (Milestone 14). Kim takes the CRO seat and reframes the journey as separate lanes off a highway, each entry point its own exit to the same city, walks the bookends-in build method, and makes the case that sales and marketing have to be one revenue engine owned by one person. Ryan runs the ownership frame: the domino sequence, why the CAC guardrail is a percentage of gross profit set before you spend, and why function beats title when you name who owns revenue. Next in the series: revenue systems and forecasting (Milestone 15).Top 10 Takeaways
You can't map a user journey until your ICP and positioning are locked first. A user journey isn't one funnel. It's a separate lane from every entry point. Match the next step to the exit. A podcast lead and a trade-show lead want different things. Start at the bookends. Re-engage your dormant database while you build top-of-funnel reach. Your dormant contacts are low-hanging fruit. That revenue funds the slower brand build. You can't decide anything without data. No data yet? Start collecting it, even half-built. Judge a channel on a three-month trend, never a single month's snapshot. When conversion stalls, ask your customers. A survey beats guessing every time. Set your CAC as a percentage of gross profit before you spend a dollar. Sales versus marketing is a wall. One person has to own the whole revenue engine.Chapters:
(00:00) Introduction to milestone 14: user journey and client acquisition cost
(08:47) You can't map a user journey until ICP is locked
(12:48) Start at the bookends: dormant contacts are your low-hanging fruit
(17:06) A user journey isn't one funnel, it's a separate lane
(19:01) Match the next step to the exit: podcast or trade-show
(26:53) Judge a channel by a three-month trend, not one snapshot
(28:42) You can't decide anything without data, so start collecting now
(30:12) When conversion stalls, ask your customers instead of guessing
(39:45) Set your CAC as a percentage of gross profit first
(45:00) Sales versus marketing is a wall, one person owns it
(48:45) Build the accountability chart fi... -
Watch on YouTube
The moment you sell, you don't own it anymore. Pay your nickel, do your dance. Your ego doesn't make the company better. Your customers carry your DNA forward whether you're there or not. The GameStop fans who took on Wall Street were proof. The moment you sell, you don't own it anymore. Pay your nickel, do your dance. Your ego doesn't make the company better. Command-and-control and entrepreneurial cultures are different organisms. Drop the wrong heart in and the body rejects it. Before you change anything, go look. Run town halls on every shift in every district. The front line already knows what's wrong. Accountability without authority is failure. Spell out what you need, then hand over the hiring, firing, and capex to deliver it. Build a one-page dashboard with the metrics that actually matter. Manage to it monthly. Everything else is pablum. Nobody should ever be fired and surprised. Miss the plan once, we talk. Miss it twice, we both already know what's next. Hire only people who say they want your job. Then make it your job to get them there. Toxic culture is a math problem. The store with the closed blinds and the screamer manager is the store losing money. Build the principles you wish your old bosses had. Honesty, integrity, and respect aren't soft. They're the operating floor.
You have a strategic plan. It's in a deck somewhere. Your team nodded at it in January, and by March everyone was quietly back to running their own version of the company. That gap between a plan on paper and a company actually aligned behind one is why I'm pulling this conversation back to the front of the feed. We just crossed 500 episodes, and Kim and I are mid-stream teaching the strategic plan and predictable revenue material right now, so before we jump back in I want you to hear what a real one looks like when it has teeth.
Gary Kusin co-founded GameStop, built Laura Mercier, then walked into Kinko's bleeding $11M of EBITDA and walked out three years later at $240M and a $2.4B sale to Fred Smith at FedEx. He didn't start with the plan. He started by listening at 2am town halls across 42 districts before changing a single thing. Then he put one plan in front of 150 leaders and said: align in 30 days or I will personally help you find your next job. This originally aired as episode 413. It's worth every minute twice.
TOP TEN TAKEAWAYS:Gary Kusin is the co-founder of GameStop (originally Babbage's), the founder of Laura Mercier Cosmetics, the former CEO of Kinko's, and a longtime senior advisor in private equity. He's mentored hundreds of executives and is the author of Always Learning: Lessons on Leveling Up from GameStop to Laura Mercier and Beyond. His career spans the full arc most middle-market owners are trying to understand: founding, scaling, professionalizing, selling, and integrating into a strategic acquirer. Mentored early by Ross Perot, with quarterly business reviews under Jack Welch and an eventual sale to Fred Smith at FedEx, Gary has seen how the people at the top either make the company or break it. This conversation originally aired as Ep. 413 in 2024 and is re-released as the bridge back into our strategic plan teaching series.
Chapters:
(00:00) Gary Kusin shares his leadership principles and mentoring approach, his journey from Texarkana to GameStop (05:00) Harvard Business School, unexpected career path, co-founding GameStop (13:00) Early days of GameStop, educating customers about video games, loyal fanbase, Wall Street challenges, maintaining relat... -
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
Watch on YouTube
You started this business to be free. If it's trapping you instead, that's a design problem, not a you problem.Freedom was always the real goal. The business is just the vehicle to get you there.Time is the one thing you never get back. You've got a finite number of weeks, so build around that.Money was never the scoreboard. Plenty of people hit the big number and you still wouldn't trade lives with them.Your wealth protects your cash flow. Your cash flow protects your time. That's the whole order.You're wearing two hats. You own the business and you also work in it. Most owners never separate the two."Should I sell?" doesn't mean anything until you know if you're talking about your job or your asset.Get clear on what you want first, or the business will eat every dollar you make.Nobody ever taught you how to actually own. You got EOS, a CPA, a peer group. The ownership seat sat empty.Sell it, keep it, or hand it to your kids. Doesn't matter. The only wrong move is guessing.
In our 500th episode, and the closest thing iBD has to an origin story on record. Kim Clark, iBD's Chief Revenue Officer and co-host, turned the interview around and asked Ryan how this whole thing got started. The real answer: Ryan started the podcast back in 2016 as a backup plan — if the business he was building didn't work out, at least enough people would know him that he could go get a job. But underneath that, the truth is he just can't stand having anybody tell him what to do. He sold his company at 27, got the check, and it still didn't feel like freedom. So he spent the next 11 years and 500 episodes talking to owners, trying to figure out the playbook nobody ever hands you — the 2016 beach in Fort Lauderdale where the idea landed, the wealth-management chapter that never fit, the original "Life After Business" title everyone mistook for a retirement show, and the allergic reaction to authority that drove the entire search.
That's what turned into Independence by Design, and the framework that finally reconciled the mission with a business model: the time, cash, and wealth scoreboard, the owner-versus-operator distinction, the outcome-neutral playbook, and the group-coaching model built on a playbook instead of consulting. It comes down to something you probably already feel in your gut. Your time is the only thing you don't get back. Your cash flow protects your time, and your wealth protects your cash flow — the business is supposed to serve all that, not eat it alive. So if you've ever felt like you're working harder than everyone you know to build something that kind of owns you, this is the one. Ryan doesn't care if you sell it, keep it, or hand it to your kids — he just wants you to actually get to choose. He closes on where it's all going next.
Top 10 TakeawaysChapters:
(00:00) Kim marks episode 500, origin story: the beach vacation and the wealth management chapter that never fit
(05:20) Freedom was always the real goal; the business is just the vehicle
(27:30) Money was never the scoreboard, even for people with a B net worth
(29:00) Time is the one thing you never get back
(44:24) A business that traps instead of frees you is a design problem
(54:53) Nobody ever taught you how to actually own your business
(58:50) You're wearing two hats: you own the business and you work in it
(1:00:05) Should I sell means nothing until you know the role
(1:01:55) Sell it,... -
Watch on YouTube
Predictable revenue is a system you build, not a number you chase.Get the revenue line right and your budget, hiring, and margins fall out of it.Build the blueprint before the tactics. Your CRM, ads, and funnels all sit on top of it.Your revenue architecture has one job: be the filter that lets you say no."Grow 20 percent a year" isn't a strategy. It's a wish with a number on it.You have one ideal customer, not three. Best is a superlative.If the opposite of your edge sounds absurd, it's table stakes, not an edge.Map every offer to every segment. Find your cash cow, your rising star, your loss leader.Be willing to alienate people. Vanilla resonates with no one.AI collapses the $40K consultant binder into a weekend, if you feed it your real why.
Your pipeline is full and your revenue still feels like a coin flip. Some quarters you hit, some you miss, and you're still the only person in the building who can reliably close a deal. That's not a sales problem. It's a blueprint problem. Kim and I are kicking off Module 5, Predictable Revenue, and the first move isn't a CRM or an ad budget. It's the revenue architecture underneath all of it, Milestone 13. Most owners call "grow 20 percent a year to $20M" a strategic plan. That's a wish with a number on it. The real blueprint names one ideal customer, not three. One winning position that survives the opposite rule. Your actual addressable market. Every offer mapped to every segment. Built right, it becomes the filter that lets you, your team, and your AI say no. And here's what changed: the strategic-planning binder that used to cost $40,000 and sit on a shelf with zero team adoption, you can now build yourself from a voice memo and a transcript. You just have to feed it your real why, not platitudes.
About This Episode
This is a Ryan and Kim teaching episode, the kickoff of Module 5 (Predictable Revenue). The Module 4 run set the table: Ep. 497 built the annual budget, Ep. 498 rolled it five years out to the valuation target. This one starts the revenue engine that feeds all of it. Kim takes the CRO seat on what predictable revenue actually is, a system you build, not a number you chase, and walks the components of the revenue architecture: ICP, winning position, TAM, sub-markets, and the offer-to-segment map. Ryan runs the ownership frame, why strategy comes before tactics, and how AI has collapsed what used to be a $40,000 consultant engagement into something an owner can build from a voice memo and a transcript. Next in the series: the customer journey (Milestone 14), then revenue systems and forecasting (Milestone 15).
Top 10 TakeawaysChapters:
(00:00) Welcoming listeners and kicking off the predictable revenue module
(04:49) Predictable revenue is a system you build, not chased
(06:35) Build the blueprint before the tactics, not after
(09:09) One ideal customer, not three — best is a superlative
(24:48) Three ICP filters: firmographics, demographics, and psychographics, with Bill's example
(30:10) Be willing to alienate people — vanilla resonates with no one
(43:00) Defining total addressable market without lying to yourself
(46:23) If the opposite sounds absurd, it's table stakes already
(51:57) Map every offer to every segment, finding your cash cow
(58:53) AI collapses the $40K consultant binder into a weekendThis episode was produced by Castos Productions.
-
Watch on YouTube
You wrote a number down. Double the revenue in five years, or a valuation somebody floated at your peer group. It's on the whiteboard, and underneath it you know nothing connects today's financials to that number. That gap is the whole episode. Kim and I get into Milestone 12, the five-year forecast, and the first thing we throw out is the idea that a revenue goal is a target. A revenue number is one-dimensional. The real target is three-dimensional: your income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement five years out, tied together, so you can see whether the growth you want eats all your cash before you get there. That's the line between a forecast and a wish. A forecast runs on data, not desire. We walk the Advanced Solutions model live through all three lenses of value, and we get honest about the AI part: Claude knows the math better than I do, but it has no idea what you want, so you hold the goals and make it prove every scenario against them. Underneath all of it sits one trade you can't dodge. Either more cash today, or more wealth tomorrow.
About This EpisodeThis is a Ryan and Kim teaching episode, the capstone of the Module 4 (Sustainable Financials) run: Ep. 492 read the gross margin chart, Ep. 497 built the annual budget, and this one rolls it all forward five years to the valuation target (Milestone 12). Ryan runs the bottom-up frame, the owner's goals as the perimeter every scenario gets tested inside, and shares the Advanced Solutions five-year model on screen. Kim brings the CRO seat on the top-down view: business cycles, conversion rates, and the business-as-usual projection that exposes the gap. The screen-share is visible on the YouTube and Spotify video versions. Next up in the series: Kim's module, Predictable Revenue.
Top 10 TakeawaysA forecast runs on data, not desire. It tells you the truth your goal has to answer to.A revenue number is one-dimensional. Your real target is all three financial statements, five years out.Grow too fast and you eat your own cash and go broke. Better to see it on the model than in your bank account.Your business has three values: what it's worth if you keep it, sell it, or what you actually pocket at closing.A fat normalized EBITDA number with no cash behind it isn't a plan B. It's a countdown to a forced sale.Lock your goals first: distributions, debt, the valuation target. Those are the bookends. Everything gets tested between them.Run your business-as-usual line five years out. The gap to your goal is your value gap, and closing it is the plan.AI knows the math better than you do. It will never know what you want. That part is your job.Every big move comes down to the same trade: more cash today, or more wealth tomorrow.When keeping the business is worth as much as selling it, you're free. That's escape velocity.
Chapters:(00:00) Introduction to milestone 12: the five-year forecast and valuation gap
(00:53) A forecast runs on data, not desire, unlike a goal
(04:10) The real target: three financial statements, not revenue alone
(06:04) Three lenses of value: why normalized EBITDA isn't a plan B
(14:36) AI knows the math, but never knows your goals
(15:54) Ryan's story: building the Advanced Solutions model with Claude
(26:33) Lock your goals first: the owner scorecard starts everything
(29:49) Kim's top-down view: business cycles, conversions,...
-
Watch on YouTube
Your P&L says you made money. Your checking account says otherwise, and nobody can tell you why. Kim and I build the annual budget that predicts your actual cash, a year out.Most owners don't start thinking about next year's budget until it's almost next year. That's the problem. By the time you sit down to build one, the months of groundwork that make it real never happened, so the budget turns into a wish. Kim and I wanted to walk through how we actually do it. Your CPA does your taxes. Your banker watches the line. Nobody is building the one thing that tells you how much cash will be in your checking account next year. Not net income. Not gross profit. Not even normalized EBITDA, which can read $2 million while your bank account reads $2. We get into building the budget as a closed loop: twelve months of all three statements tied together so tightly nothing can hide, starting from your ownership goals and cascading down through revenue, margins, and working capital. Kim takes the CRO seat and reverse-engineers the revenue number out of the customer journey. I run the chart. The payoff is the bottom right corner of the puzzle: the cash, a year out, predicted within a few hundred dollars.
This is a Ryan and Kim teaching episode, the second stop inside Module 4 (Sustainable Financials) after the three-statement model. Ryan runs the financial model and the ownership-goals frame. Kim brings the CRO seat, where the revenue forecast gets reverse-engineered out of the customer journey. It's the budgeting piece of a connected run: Ep. 492 read the gross margin chart, Eps 493 to 495 built the executive comp plan off normalized net operating income, and the next episode closes the loop with the five-year forecast and the value gap.
Top 10 Takeaways
Your net income is not your cash. A real budget predicts the actual dollars in your account. Begin with what you want. Then pressure-test it against what your team can actually pull off. Don't just divide last year by twelve. Take your trailing twelve months, add seasonality, then growth. Build it as a closed loop. When all three statements tie together, nothing can hide from you. Break revenue into product lines. Each has its own margin, and the blended number lies to you. Your accounting system won't force good numbers. A real model does, and shows you what's broken. Go in order: your goals, then revenue, then operations, then your CFO ties it all together. Make your CRO reverse-engineer the revenue back through the customer journey and real conversion rates. Working capital is where your cash hides. Receivables, payables, and inventory will drain you dry. Don't try to build this yourself. Spend your energy finding the person who owns the model.Chapters:
(00:00) Introduction: Why June is the right time to start budgeting
(03:20) The closed-loop system: All three statements tied together
(07:52) Begin with ownership goals: Cash flow, distributions, and valuation
(13:40) The three-statement model: The only financial model you'll ever need
(21:33) How daunting is this? Real talk on the 90-day boardroom blueprint
(32:15) Break revenue into product lines — the blended margin lies to you
(40:33) Working capital: Where your cash hides — receivables, payables, inventory
(50:32) The CRO seat: Reverse-engineering revenue through the customer journey
(58:07) Groundwork, collaboration, and what good actually looks like
(1:01:30) Where to start: Atomic habits, baby steps, and blocking the time
(1:03:30) Next week: Five-year forecast, valuation gap,... -
Watch on YouTube
Every dollar your business makes, you have to place. Reinvest it, pull it out, or move it somewhere that holds its value. And that decision sits on a base layer most owners never see. The same three-statement math that runs your company runs the whole world, with one difference. Governments can print. That worked for 50 years because the US forced the world to buy oil in dollars, keeping the system afloat. That era is ending now: the Strait of Hormuz, supply chains breaking, a world that no longer wants the dollar or its bonds. Tom Walker came back on to walk through what it means, and it ends in more printing. More printing means more inflation, and inflation is what quietly decides whether you reinvest in your business or move into hard assets that protect what you've built. You don't control the base layer. But once you see how it works, you make that call with your eyes open instead of on gut.
Tom Walker, Jr. is an economist and CFO who runs Walker Insight, the Minneapolis firm his father started in 1975 to bring real financial planning to independent farmers. Tom Jr. joined in 1989, and for decades he's built custom planning models for farms, food processors, and manufacturers, fusing economics, finance, and production so owners can weigh risk, prove a concept, secure financing, and track progress against their goals. He's a returning guest (first on Ep. 415, "Everyone Gets Punched in the Face"). His lens hasn't changed: you don't plan to predict the future, you plan to build a framework that survives the hit.Top 10 Takeaways
You can't make a good ownership decision blind to how the game works. Learn the board first. Your business is a closed loop. Cash in, cash out, no printer. The government runs the same three statements you do. The only difference is it can print. Cash flow is the only honest scorecard. Every valuation is a bet on future cash flow. Paper wealth and cash wealth are different games. A marked-up asset is worth what someone pays. An asset that won't cash flow for a new buyer is a bet on the next buyer. Know the bet you're making. New money reaches the connected first. Know where you sit before you plan around it. The market gets propped because it has to be. Read the signal, not the headline number. Liquidity is optionality. Stay liquid and you get to decide instead of getting forced. See the game clearly, price on cash flow, and you decide on purpose instead of on gut.
Chapters:(00:00) Introduction of Tom Walker, Jr., economist and CFO at Walker Insight
(01:03) Macro sanity checks: Lyn Alden, Luke Gromen, and Larry Lepard
(04:43) Your business is a closed loop — cash in, cash out, no printer
(14:12) Farming as a microcosm: no soft landing, fiat conditions on the ground
(29:50) The Cantillon Effect: new money reaches the connected first
(38:39) Advice for owners and farmers navigating fiscal dominance
(55:09) How fragile the system really is — 4% breaks the whole thing
(01:09:10) Supply chain risk, locking in inputs, and who actually survives
(01:25:23) Own the outcome: finding the right guide without outsourcing your freedom
(01:31:14) Stay solvent to be right eventually — the Noah's Ark framework
This episode was produced by Castos Productions.
Resources:
Walker Insight — https://www.walkerinsight.com/
Tom Walker on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/thomaswalk... -
Watch on YouTube
You've got one person you can't afford to lose, running an outcome you know you can't hit alone. They've started asking about the upside, and your gut says give them a piece of the company. Then you remember what real equity costs. A K-1 every April. A cap table. Permission required to sell your own business.
Kim and I get into phantom stock: real money tied to real valuation growth, without putting anyone on your cap table. It's a contract and a balance sheet liability, pegged to the same four numbers every valuation already runs on. The catch is, there's no shortcut here, unlike on the annual plan. Build the owner's goals, the valuation, and the five-year model first, or you've got it backwards.
We get into the one honest test for whether someone earned it at all (can you hit the five-year number without them?), Why you never tie the payout to a sale, and the worked example where sharing 5% of a $21.01M outcome costs you nothing, because it never existed without the person who earned it.
Top 10 Takeaways
A salary rents someone's effort. Long-term comp ties them to the value you build together. The one honest test: if you can hit your five-year number without this person, don't grant phantom stock. Go hire someone who wants a salary. There's no shortcut on a long-term plan. Build the model, the valuation, and the five-year forecast first, or you have it backwards. Phantom stock is a contract and a balance sheet liability. No cap table, no K-1, no operating agreement. Real equity ropes you together on taxes, distributions, and the decision to sell. Phantom stock doesn't. Never tie the payout to a sale. Do that and your executives start needing you to sell. Peg it to a cash flow valuation, not the private equity premium someone might pay someday. Have a neutral third party value the company every year. Ten to fifteen grand ends the argument before it starts. Size it like a budget. Percentages first, then meaningful dollars, then what the company can actually afford. The math is the hard part. Once it's clear, the attorney's contract is about three grand.Chapters:
(00:00) Introduction: Ryan and Kim on sharing company upside without equity
(02:20) A salary rents someone's effort; long-term comp ties them to value
(04:05) What usually goes wrong without a long-term strategy in place
(06:11) No shortcut: build the model, valuation, and five-year forecast first
(13:15) Phantom stock: a balance sheet liability, no cap table, no K-1
(19:40) The one honest test: can you hit the five-year number without them?
(41:00) Never tie the payout to a sale; executives will need you to sell
(47:29) Peg it to a cash flow valuation, not the private equity premium
(56:24) Have a neutral third party value the company; ten to fifteen grand ends the argument
(1:02:09) ESOPs, SARs, and creative layered approaches to ownership transitions
This episode was produced by Castos Productions.
Resources:
Executive Comp Workshop June 25 – 9 AM - 11am CST – Virtual, Live, Interactive: https://ryantansom.com/the-compensation-blueprint-workshop
90-Day Boardroom Blueprint Ryan's onboarding program that walks owners through the IBD Ownership OS, three-statement financial model, budget, and forecast — the foundation required before designing any executive comp plan. -
Watch on YouTube
You're paying highly paid people to take problems off your plate. Instead they're handing you back monkeys, drama, and a deal you end up pricing yourself. Sales and Operations are at war over what got sold and what can actually be delivered. Finance is caught in the middle. You're the referee. You're not bad at this. The comp plan is. Each leader gets paid on their own win, so winning at a peer's expense pays, and the monkeys land back on your desk by the end of the day.In this episode I walk you through the annual executive comp plan I installed at my family's business and have put in with clients since. The move is to tie your top leaders to each other through the income statement and to your ownership goals at the same time. Half of their variable rides on their own seat. A quarter rides on each peer. Now winning at a peer's expense stops paying. Now the monkeys stay where they belong. Now you get to do the work only you can do, the strategic, the big, the broken things that are actually interesting to you. Kim and I get into the bonus pool sized top-down off normalized net operating income so it's always affordable, the multipliers that run both directions, and why one of our clients ran the math and decided not to hire the $500,000 CEO he was about to go find. He wanted the seat back. The seat got worth wanting again.
Top 10 Takeaways
You're paying highly paid people to take problems off your plate. They're handing you back monkeys. The drama isn't your team. It's the comp plan paying each of them only on their own win. Tie your top leaders to each other through the income statement. Three buckets, three seats: revenue, margins, SG&A and cash. The 50/25/25 model ropes them together. Half their variable on their own seat, a quarter on each peer's. Now winning at a peer's expense stops paying. The monkeys stay where they belong. Comp each executive on numbers they actually control. Not on a peer's leadership growth. Size the bonus pool top-down. A fixed slice of normalized net operating income. Bottom-up reconciles to it. Run multipliers on every seat. 1.1x to 1.2x up, 0.8x to 0.7x down, with a floor where the piece stops paying. The company's cash flow and your ownership goals set what comp is affordable. Title doesn't. Wish doesn't. Get the comp right and you get the work back: the strategic, the big, the broken things only you can do.Chapters:
(00:00) Ryan and Kim on designing the annual executive comp plan(02:33) The drama isn't your team — it's the comp plan paying on their own win
(03:21) The 50/25/25 model: tying top leaders to each other through the income statement
(10:30) Size the bonus pool top-down off normalized net operating income
(12:20) Cash flow and ownership goals set what comp is affordable — title doesn't
(18:00) Comp each executive on numbers they actually control, not a peer's growth
(20:43) Total inversion: monkeys stay where they belong, you get the work back
(21:06) Run multipliers on every seat: 1.1x up, 0.8x down, with a floor
(53:46) Fractional leaders: can they actually own the outcome of the seat
(1:05:20) You've got to do the work — comp grounded in data, goals, and financials
This episode was produced by Castos Productions.
Resources:
Executive Comp Workshop June 25 – 9 AM - 11am CST – Virtual, Live, Interactive: https://ryantansom.com/the-compen... -
Watch on YouTube
This is the kickoff of a multi-episode arc on Module 8 (Executive Compensation) of the iBD Ownership OS. Kim Clark, iBD's CRO and business partner, runs the interview; she spent years designing sales and revenue comp at ITR Economics before joining iBD. Module 8 is Ryan's territory, so the format flips: Kim asks, Ryan teaches the system. The next two episodes go deeper on short-term incentive design (annual exec bonuses, cascade math, KPI architecture) and long-term phantom stock mechanics (vesting, valuation triggers, the M9 transition bridge). The companion workshop where you actually build your own plan is June 25, 2026.You have a $40,000 executive comp plan sitting on your desk and you don't know if it's the right one. Your insurance broker pitched it. Your attorney drafted it. Your HR person was distracted. And it's tied to absolutely nothing that matters. The first call I had with that client, he asked me, "Should I sign this?" I asked back: What's your five-year valuation target? Cash flow goals? Do you have a financial model? Three nos in a row. That's where most owners are. Comp gets treated as an HR motivation problem when it's actually a capital allocation decision that has to trickle down from the owner's goals.
Your comp plan keeps failing because you're paying people on outcomes they can't control.Comp tied to gut feel breeds resentment, not productivity. The exact opposite of what you wanted.Comp design starts with the owner. Not HR. Not your attorney. Not the insurance broker pitching annuities.You can't build a comp plan without a five-year valuation target and a financial model in front of you.Hiring a CFO before your model exists? Tie their first bonus to building the model.Comp is a capital allocation decision, not a motivation problem. You're sharing future cash flow.Normalized net operating income beats gross profit because a CRO can crush GP and crater operations by overhiring.Your bonus pool is 10% of normalized NOI. Everything else is just how you split it.Phantom stock is a legal contract and a real liability on the balance sheet. No cap table, no K-1.When the goals are clear and the rules are clear, the executive team runs the field. Subjectivity is exhausting.
Kim and I open Module 8 with the reframe and the cascade: why this module only works after Modules 1 through 7 are installed, why normalized net operating income beats gross profit and net income for the bonus pool, what 10% of NOI looks like split across the executive team and the company, and why phantom stock does most of what real equity does without putting anyone on your cap table. When the goals are clear and the rules are clear, the executive team runs the field. When subjectivity rules, everyone is just guessing.
Top 10 TakeawaysChapters:
(00:00) Introduction to Module 8: executive compensation and why it exists
(01:46) Your comp plan keeps failing because you're paying on outcomes they can't control
(04:15) Comp tied to gut feel breeds resentment, not productivity
(07:21) Comp design starts with the owner, not HR, your attorney, or the insurance broker
(10:38) Why this module only works after Modules 1 through 7 are installed
(16:24) Comp is a capital allocation decision, not a motivation problem
(19:25) Normalized NOI beats gross profit and net income for the bonus pool
(26:20) Your bonus pool is 10% of normalized NOI — here's how you split it
(32... -
Watch on YouTube
Top 10 TakeawaysYour three financial statements are a closed loop, and every operating decision ripples through all three.Without a five-year plan, every margin decision is made in a vacuum.Gross profit can grow every year while gross margins quietly shrink.The blended company gross margin hides the line that's bleeding by averaging it with the line that's healthy.Rates of change are your early warning system, before the trend shows up in cash.If costs and revenue don't land in the same month, your gross margin is fiction.Every product line needs a target margin and a floor, and the floor triggers the boardroom conversation.Gross profit grew because you sold more, or because your margins expanded, and the split tells you whether the year was real.The gross margin chart you're looking at this month is the input to your distribution next December.The COO seat asks how to operate around the margin, and the owner seat asks what to do with the cash it produces.
Most owners stare at the same gross profit number every month and feel good about it, and the chart underneath it is telling a completely different story. Revenue is up. Gross profit dollars are up. You feel good for about ten seconds. Then you notice the gross margin percentage is creeping the wrong way and you don't know if it matters. Your CPA does taxes. Your banker manages the line. Nobody is sitting at the chart with you asking the next question.
That next question is what this episode is for. We get into how to read the gross margin chart by product line, where to set the floor that triggers the boardroom conversation, what the rate of change is actually telling you before the trend shows up in cash, and how the same chart asks one question if you're wearing the COO hat and a completely different one if you're wearing the owner hat. The owner question is where most operators get stuck, because almost nobody runs the seats separately. Real example from my old copier business, real numbers from the case study, and the honest version of how messy it is to get your data clean enough to actually believe.Chapters:
(00:00) Three financial statements are a closed loop; every decision ripples through all three(03:00) Without a five-year plan, every margin decision is made in a vacuum
(07:30) Gross profit can grow every year while gross margins quietly shrink
(11:00) Rates of change are your early warning system before the trend shows up in cash
(12:30) If costs and revenue don't land in the same month, your gross margin is fiction
(19:30) The blended gross margin hides the line that's bleeding
(26:30) Every product line needs a target, a floor, and the floor triggers the boardroom conversation
(35:00) The split tells you whether the year was real: revenue growth or margin expansion
(43:00) The gross margin chart this month is the input to your distribution next December
(49:00) The COO seat asks how to operate; the owner seat asks what to do with the cash
This episode was produced by Castos Productions.
Resources:
Boardroom Blueprint — The 90-day program where Ryan walks owners through installing the financial model, business valuation, and iBD Ownership OS™. — ryantansom.com/coachingEp. 487 — Casey Brown: Th...
-
Watch on YouTube
"I want the seller to level with me. I don't want to be his priest or pastor, but I want honesty, and I don't want any surprises down the road." - Bud Martin,
Bud Martin once watched a son kill his parents' deal by telling every buyer tour the company would never make it without him. I told Bud I was 27 when we sold our family business — and I knew I could have done the same thing. I almost did. That story is the human core under every M&A advisory conversation we don't talk about enough. Bud Martin runs controlled auctions for businesses in the $1M-$3M EBITDA range — a no man's land for owners. Too complex for brokers. Too small for the big banks. We get into what a real sell-side process actually looks like at this level, why most lower middle market deals are cash-at-closing strategic bolt-ons (not earnouts), the family dynamic that kills more deals than bad numbers ever will, and the philosophical question I keep coming back to: build a cash-flow business that gives you choices, or chase a third-party strategic deal that maximizes cash at closing. Both work. They're just not the same.Top 10 Takeaways
The $1M-$3M EBITDA range is no man's land — too complex for brokers, too small for the big banks, and most owners get the worst sell-side representation right when they need the best. A controlled auction is non-negotiable — multiple bidders keep buyers honest, drive pace, and protect your leverage; day 92 close is the goal, day 180 is a red flag. Most lower middle market deals are cash at closing because strategic buyers write checks from the balance sheet — no banks involved, faster closes, cleaner deal structures. Earnouts in this segment are shifting from financial metrics to integration milestones — one of Bud's current deals is 95% cash, 5% tied to a six-month CRM integration. The family dynamic kills more deals than bad numbers — if your partners aren't on the same page before you call a banker, the deal is already dead. Build a cash-flow business and you have choices — ESOP, internal transfer, third-party, PE — but if you go straight to a strategic buyer, cash at closing goes through the roof and the cultural trade-offs come with it. The buyer who already knows your industry isn't the best buyer — the aligned-industry buyer who wants to be in your space is, because that's where 2+2 = 5 or 6. A $3M revenue fire safety business landed a $5 billion publicly-traded buyer because the industry was consolidating and Bud reached out to everyone — including the companies that looked too big. Bud gives sellers a conservative valuation so they're surprised on the upside — if the seller isn't in the same area code on number, he walks away from the engagement. Geopolitical risk lands on the deal table — a strategic buyer pulled out of one of Bud's deals in February because the Iran situation spooked their backlog and changed the math.Bud Martin is the founder of M&A Connect, a lower middle market M&A advisory firm based in the Chicago area. William (Bud) Martin has over 20 years of M&A experience. Prior to founding M&A Connect, he was with a highly regarded Midwestern M&A firm and was the leading broker by revenue and transactions closed during his seven years there. Bud has been the lead advisor on dozens of middle market transactions and is a current board member of Dynamic Rubber Inc. near Chicago. Before M&A, Bud owned a contract manufacturer of precision-machined components serving OEMs in aerospace, automotive, and business machine industries. He started his career as a runner on the Chicago Board of Trade and traded options on the...
-
This interview is about why the old playbook of waiting for certainty is dead, and what owners need to do instead. Alex Chausovsky walks through how supply chain shocks, inflation, and a broken global system are hitting real P&Ls right now — input costs moving, margins under pressure, and customers who may or may not have the money to keep buying. Kim Clark and I then turn it into the owner's next move: three decision vectors (pricing, inventory, supply chain), pricing as an ownership decision — not a sales problem, segment your customers so a 12% increase doesn't blow up your tier-one relationships, and communicate the move in a way that builds trust instead of burning it. Build the battle plan before you need it — because by the time you need it, it's too late to build.
Stop waiting for clarity and start building scenarios — pricing, inventory, and supply chain are the three decision vectors you stress-test now, not when the crisis hits. Every CEO should have a filing cabinet of pre-built scenarios. When the Strait closes, you open the folder. You don't start planning. A 2% global disruption is not a 2% hit — Qatar LNG, aluminum, diesel trucking, and fertilizer all chain off the same chokepoint, and the tail kills the whole machine. Availability is becoming a bigger moat than price — "I can get it to you when you need it" is worth more than being ten cents cheaper. Pricing is an ownership decision, not a sales problem — the math runs through your valuation, distributions, and cash flow, which makes it a boardroom conversation. A 12% increase dropped in a week without a "why" reads like collusion; the same 12% broken into transportation, material, and wages lands. Don't push uniform pricing across every customer — your Tier 1 relationships can absorb what Tier 2 and below cannot, and segmentation is where the margin gets protected. The top 20% drives 60% of US consumption — be honest about whether your customer actually has the money to keep buying what you sell. You're not in business to grow revenue — you're in business to make a profit, and that means running your P&L by customer and product line. The five-year forecast is the destination — scenario planning is how you course-correct to actually get there when the world gets loud.
Watch on YouTube
Top 10 TakeawaysAlex Chausovsky is the President of 3DM Consulting. He is a highly experienced market researcher and analyst with more than two decades of expertise across subjects including economics, manufacturing, automation, advanced technology trends, and business cycle analysis. He has consulted and advised companies throughout the US and Canada, Europe, South America, and Asia. Alex has delivered over a thousand presentations, webinars, and workshops to small businesses, trade associations, and Fortune 500 companies across a spectrum of industries, and is the go-to source of industry data and insights for business owners and leaders. Alex's analysis has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, on the BBC, and on NPR, and he is a Top Voice on LinkedIn.
Chapters:
(00:00) Introduction of Alex Chausovsky, President of 3DM Consulting, economist and geopolitical analyst
(03:30) Alex's lens: geopolitics as geography plus leadership personalities driving global policy
(16:00) A 2% disruption is not a 2% hit — Qatar LNG, aluminum, diesel, and fertilizer all chain off the same chokepoint
(24:16) Availability is becoming a bigger moat than price — "I can get it when you need it" beats ten cents cheaper
(28:48) Stop waiting for clarity: every CEO needs a filing cabinet of pre-built... -
My protein powder went from $62 to $122. The company's response was a mass email that started with "we understand your frustration." That is exactly how most businesses handle price increases. No plan. No segmentation. Just a surprise and an apology nobody asked for.
Watch on YouTubeKim Clark and I sat down to talk about pricing. Not theory. The real conversation that happens when your input costs are moving and you have to decide what to do about it. We started with a protein powder subscription that went from $62 to $122 in a single month with no warning, no communication plan, and a mass apology email nobody asked for. From there we got into why pricing is an ownership decision that runs through valuation, cash flow, and distributions. I walked through the income statement to balance sheet to ownership decision chain the way I do it in a quarterly board meeting.
Kim broke down rates of change analysis on your input costs as the early warning system, the customer segmentation framework for who gets a phone call, who gets a personal email, and who gets the mass communication, and how to give your sales team the "why" and the training to hold the line. We also talked about what is happening right now with the Strait of Hormuz, what that means for supply chains, and why this is different from every other inflationary cycle most of us have lived through.
Top 10 Takeaways
Pricing is an ownership decision. The math runs through valuation, distributions, and cash flow. That conversation belongs in the boardroom, not with your VP of Sales. The Strait of Hormuz is closed right now. Twenty percent of the world's oil and fifty percent of its helium are not flowing. Pull up IMF PortWatch and see for yourself. You cannot print molecules. Money printing is one problem. Physical supply chain disruption is a different problem. Both are happening at the same time. The boiling frog kills more businesses than the crisis. A container going from $2,500 to $20,000 gets an emergency call. Margins sliding from 43% to 37% over seven months gets ignored. Rates of change on your input costs are the early warning system. The 3-month rate leads the 12-month rate. When those diverge, your tire pressure light just came on. Build tiered battle plans before you need them. If input costs hit 8%, here is Plan A. If they hit 12%, here is Plan B. Do the math now so you are not doing it in a panic. Your salesperson is caught between company pressure, customer pressure, and the fear of losing the deal that pays their mortgage. Without the "why" and the tools, you are sending them into an impossible position. Segment your customers before you communicate a price increase. Tier 1 gets a personal visit. Tier 2 gets a personalized email from leadership. Tier 3 gets the mass communication. State what is NOT changing before you discuss what IS changing. Casey Brown calls these power statements. Anchor the customer on the value that continues, then explain the adjustment. Run at least one full pricing analysis per year and rotate which customer segments get increases. Pricing discipline is a cadence, not a crisis response.
Kim Clark- This is a co-hosted episode with Kim Clark, iBD's Chief Revenue Officer. Kim spent years at ITR Economics before joining iBD, and her background in economic forecasting and revenue operations is all over this conversation. Ryan and Kim recorded this as both a standalone episode and an introduction to the Profit War Room workshop (April 27, 2026). The protein powder story that opens the episode came from a real text exchange with Ryan's buddy Michael the week be...
-
Dr. Sabrina Starling is the founder of Tap the Potential and the author of The Four Week Vacation. This is her second time on the show. We got into what $10,000/hour work actually means for the owner and for every person on their team.
Watch on YouTube
We talked about how AI is accelerating the opportunity to delegate. How A-players are 900 to 1,200% more productive than average performers. Why delegation always goes down the org chart, never up. And the 4-week vacation test as the single best forcing function for figuring out what you are still holding onto that someone else should be doing.Sabrina works 10 hours a week now. Her team of 7 part-time A-players produces what people assume takes 20 full-time staff. Two years ago her husband passed away suddenly and she was out for six weeks. Her team never missed a beat. We also got into something most owners do not talk about: the friendships, the hobbies, the life outside the business that disappears when work becomes the only identity you have.
Top 10 Takeaways$10,000/hour work is not about billing rate. It is any activity where you are working from your strengths and making everything else easier for yourself or others. If it does not meet that test, it should not be on your calendar.41% of a knowledge worker's week goes to discretionary tasks that could be delegated or automated. In a 50-hour week, that is 20 hours you are giving away for free.The 4-week vacation test is not a perk. It is a diagnostic. Take four weeks completely unplugged. Whatever breaks is what you have not actually delegated yet.Once you delegate something and it works, do not take it back. The moment you pull it back, you just told your best person their growth has a ceiling.A-players try three things before they ask for help. When they do ask, they show you what they already tried. If your team leads with "what should I do?" you have a hiring problem, not a training problem.You cannot afford not to hire the more expensive person. Sabrina's framing: treat the hire as a loan to yourself. The right person frees hours immediately that are worth more than their salary.Five direct reports. That is the cap. More than that and your weekly one-on-ones become status updates instead of actual development conversations.A-players are 900 to 1,200% more productive than average performers. Before AI. Sabrina's team of 7 part-time people produces what outsiders assume requires 20 full-time employees.Boredom is the prerequisite for creativity. Every time you pick up your phone when you have nothing to do, you kill the process before it starts. Cal Newport calls scrolling "Doritos for your brain." The owner who cannot sit still for 10 minutes without checking email is the same owner who says they never have any good ideas.Q-Storming: instead of brainstorming answers, brainstorm questions. The right question reframes the entire problem. Most rooms full of smart people are solving the wrong thing.Dr. Sabrina Starling is the founder of Tap the Potential, a business coaching firm that helps entrepreneurs build businesses that run without them. She is the author of the How to Hire the Best series and The Four Week Vacation, and co-hosts the Profit by Design podcast. Sabrina's work centers on building A-player teams, delegating effectively, and helping owners identify and protect their $10,000/hour work. She was previously on this podcast in Episode 335.
Chapters: ... -
Most owners plan their transition around money. Pete Walker thinks that's why so many of them end up with regret.
Watch on YouTubeEpisode Summary:
Your pricing strategy is probably a B+. Your team's ability to hold the line is a C-. That gap is where the real money lives. I brought Casey Brown back for a third time because one of my clients just went through her program and watched his entire sales team transform how they handle pricing conversations. Casey is the founder of Boost Pricing, author of Fearless Pricing, and has a TEDx talk with over 4 million views. She has spent 25 years helping over 1,000 companies generate more than $1 billion in incremental profits. In this episode, we got into why fixing execution captures 80% of the benefit at a fraction of the cost of fixing strategy. Why fear, not skill, is the real reason your team discounts. How your personal "money story" from childhood quietly sabotages every pricing conversation. And why quarterly strategic pricing reviews are the discipline most companies have never heard of, let alone implemented.
Top 10 TakeawaysTurning your pricing strategy from a B to an A is expensive and slow. Turning your team's execution from a C- to a B+ is fast, cheap, and captures 80% of the upside.
Every company Casey has worked with, over 1,000 of them, has been underpriced somewhere. Not one has ever been charging the maximum the market would bear.
Fear, not skill, is the dominant emotion in pricing decisions. Salespeople know what to say. They just panic when the customer pushes back and discount anyway.
Everyone has a "money story" from childhood that affects how they sell. Casey grew up in a family of seven on $32,000 a year. The first time she quoted $35,000 for a project, her stomach went tight because that number meant something personal.
Asymmetrical feedback destroys pricing confidence. Nobody ever says "Wow, that's a deal!" but you hear "that's too expensive" ten times a day. Even when you are not too expensive.
The real framework is not "say this when they say that." It is: illuminate the blind spot, create a path for practice, then reinforce with accountability. Beliefs precede behaviors precede results.
If you make pricing weird, it gets weird. Dogs and prospects can smell fear. Desperation breath eliminates your pricing power faster than anything.
Stop selling features. A valve with seven pressure settings means nothing. $180,000 per quarter in savings that lets them hire four people? Now you are speaking their language.
Quarterly strategic pricing reviews should be the default. Lock your senior leadership in a room, assign one person to argue prices are too low and another to argue they are too high. Debate it. Profitable decisions will come out of it.
If you anchor your pricing to your costs, you are telling the customer that the only reason they should pay you is for your inputs. You are admitting zero value added. Price from value, not from cost. A company with 85% gross margins still has pricing upside because 100% of every price increase flows straight to profit.
Sound Bites"100% of the companies on the planet that I've ever met are underpriced. Meaning in some corner of the business, there's something you could charge more for." — Casey Brown [00:19:44]. After being asked how she knows if a company is underpriced. She has never been proven wrong across 1,000+ engagements.
"Fear is the dominant emotion present for pricing decisions and negotiations. Not anything else. Fear." — Casey Brown [00:38:34]. Explaining why traditional skill-based sales training fails....
-
Most owners plan their transition around money. Pete Walker thinks that's why so many of them end up with regret.
Watch on YouTube
Pete grew up on a 100-acre potato farm in a community of 90 people in Prince Edward Island. When his dad shut the farm down, 15 neighbors lost their seasonal jobs, local businesses lost a customer, and the tax base shrank. That story is now playing out across thousands of communities in the U.S. and Canada as owner-operators approach retirement without a plan. Pete spent 14 years at TD Bank, served in Canadian government economic development, and now runs Boughton Riverview Consulting, where he helps owners figure out what they actually want before a crisis forces a binary choice. We got into his "story of you" framework, why employee ownership is gaining traction in Canada, and how to normalize the hardest conversation most owners will ever have.
Top 10 Takeaways
If you don't decide what happens to your business, someone else will. And you probably won't like their version. The false choice between maximizing sale price and preserving legacy is eating owners alive. If you plan early enough, it doesn't have to be binary. Pete asks every owner one question: "What is the story of you that you're trying to create?" Most have never been asked. Their eyes bug out because they don't have an answer. When Pete's dad shut the family farm, 15 neighbors lost their jobs, local businesses lost a customer, and the tax base shrank. That's what happens when a business leaves a community without a plan. Multiply that by thousands of retiring owners across the U.S. and Canada. Employee ownership isn't charity. It's a strong economic case. 8-12% more productive. More resilient in downturns. Faster loan paybacks. Employees retire with roughly twice the wealth. Private equity isn't evil, but the incentive structure is baked in. Shorter hold periods, higher leverage, and a built-in need to sell create a fundamentally different game than employee ownership. Canada just launched an Employee Ownership Trust with a $10M capital gains tax exemption for sellers. But the incentive sunsets at the end of 2026 if it doesn't get made permanent. The advisory ecosystem is broken for the lower middle market. Fees have tripled. Minimums have gone up. The $2-3M EBITDA company with 120 employees can barely get anyone to return their calls. Most owners conflate cash flow and wealth. Separating the two, and understanding how time connects them, is the first step toward making a confident decision instead of a panicked one. If you or your advisor even hint at projecting a decision onto the owner, it won't work. It's their story. Your job is to help them write it.
Pete Walker is the principal consultant at Boughton Riverview Consulting and a board member of Employee Ownership Canada. He is a Certified Exit Planning Advisor (CEPA) who helps business owners figure out what they actually want from their transition before they get pushed into a decision by a crisis or an unsolicited offer. Pete grew up on a 100-acre potato and cattle farm in St. George's, Prince Edward Island, a community of 90 people, where his family had been on the same land since the 1800s. He attended Yale University (BA) and Ivey Business School (MBA, Honours). His career spans three acts: political advisor for Atlantic Canadian economic development, 14 years as an executive at TD Bank in Canada, and now business transition planning and employee ownership advocacy. He is passionate about keeping businesses locally owned, operated, and thriving in their communities through the generational transiti...
-
Steve Moss has spent his career figuring out why senior executive hires blow up. It almost never has to do with whether they can do the job.
Watch on YouTubeIf you are thinking about hiring your first real C-suite leader, or you have already been burned by one who didn't work out, this conversation is going to hit close to home. Steve runs Executive Springboard. He matches new executives with mentors who have sat in that exact chair, and his retention rate is 95% over 18 months. We got into the real stuff. Why coachability matters more than IQ. What Steve calls the "passed over and pissed off" problem. Why he thinks the CHRO is the missing seat at the table. And how to build a leadership bench when your company can't afford the price tag of an off-the-shelf C-suite.
Top 10 Takeaways
50% of senior executives fail within 18 months. And it's almost never because they can't do the job. Mentoring is not coaching. Mentors share their scars. Coaches ask questions. Consultants tell you what to do. The "passed over and pissed off" problem will blow up your culture if you don't address it head on. Consider building before buying. Your internal person who knows the culture might beat an external hire who takes six months to find and another six to ramp. The CHRO is the missing seat at the leadership table. Not open enrollment. Strategic talent and culture as a counterweight to the CFO's numbers focus. Executive presence is character, substance, and style. Change your style to fake presence and everyone will smell it. AI adoption is lumpy. Most organizations know they're behind. The real risk is employees adopting unsanctioned tools while leadership sits on their hands. AI doesn't replace the need for leaders who can think. It amplifies whatever's already there. Clear goals or confusion. Coachability is the number one predictor of executive success. Not functional skill. Not IQ. The willingness to ask for feedback and act on it. Managing change is managing other people's grief. Go too fast and you'll turn the corner to find nobody followed you.
Steve Moss is the founder and president of Executive Springboard, a network of 100+ current and former C-suite executives who mentor leaders to help them excel in new roles. Before founding Executive Springboard, Steve was the chief marketing officer at Pillsbury International, Nestle Ice Cream, and Imation. He reversed Smirnoff's decline in Canada and set the brand on six consecutive years of growth, expanded Goldschlager from the US to 20+ countries and four continents, and has had 50+ direct reports go on to become VPs or presidents. Steve holds a BA from Georgetown University and an MBA from The Wharton School. Executive Springboard offers structured 8-month mentoring programs for senior onboarding, promotion readiness, executive engagement, off-boarding, and outplacement. The company works with organizations from $20M to $10B in revenue across all industries. Steve previously lived in Minnesota for 26 years and now operates from Maryland. Learn more at ExecSpringboard.com.
Chapters:
(00:00) Steve Moss, founder of Executive Springboard - AI roundtables reveal most organizations know they're already behind(03:21) Executive Springboard expands from onboarding to full executive career lifecycle
(16:00) 50% of senior executives fail in 18 months — almost never the job skills
(18:24) The "passed over and pissed off" problem will blow up your culture
(22:42) Mentoring is not coaching: mentors share their scars, coaches ask questions
(34:00) The CHRO is...
-
Here's something I keep running into. My clients need leaders. Not bodies. Not fractional band-aids. Real people who can think, decide, and own results. And every time I ask where they're looking, it's the same answer: recruiters who send resumes written by AI for roles described by AI. Nobody is talking to anybody.
Watch on YouTubeMeg Gold has been on both sides of this. She spent thirteen years at ADP. Sold payroll door-to-door in Stillwater (my town). Rose to VP in San Francisco, where she was sent to flip an underperforming region. She fired a top performer for being a cancer to the culture and caught heat from every direction for it. She knows what it takes to build a real team and what it costs to lead one honestly inside a system that punishes you for it. Then she held her son for the first time and realized she was done being someone else for a living. She and her co-founder, Parnian, built Bonde, a vetted community for women leaders who are done being stuck and ready to do real work.
If you're trying to build a team that doesn't need you in every room, listen to this one.
The authenticity gap between corporate leaders and owner-operators is the biggest hidden talent problem in the middle market.Most career pivots don't start with clarity. They start with action. I call it "effing around to find out."Your network is narrower than you think. Thirteen years heads-down at one company and Meg looked up to realize her entire network was ADP people.Bonde accepts 30% of applicants. Vetting isn't gatekeeping. It's how you protect the room.The best recruiter for your next leader is the person already on your team who loves working there.If your interview doesn't feel like two people grabbing a beer at an airport layover, you're doing it wrong.An inch of cancer can kill a 300-pound man. Fire the toxic top performer. The team will cover the number.Leaders don't need to be taught to be human. Leadership is human. Corporate just trained it out of them.The demographic cliff is real. For every five boomers retiring, there's one of us. Authentic leadership is about to become the scarcest asset in the market.Owner-operators have what everyone wants. Real autonomy, real culture, real impact. Start telling that story.
Top 10 Takeaways
Meg Gold is the co-founder of Bonde, a private professionals club for women in the second and third stages of their careers. Before building Bonde, Meg spent over 13 years at ADP, starting as a door-to-door payroll rep in Minneapolis and rising to Vice President overseeing the San Francisco Bay Area region, where she was tasked with turning around an underperforming territory. Meg's career has also included private equity advisory work with Globalization Partners and fractional revenue and leadership consulting for venture-backed companies. She and her co-founder Parnian built Bonde after experiencing firsthand the gap between what corporate environments offer and what experienced women leaders actually need: vetted community, authentic connection, honest career support, and access to opportunities through trusted relationships rather than broken recruiter pipelines. Bonde launched in September 2024, currently has over 150 members with a 30% acceptance rate, and a waitlist of over 2,500. Learn more at joinBondee.com.Chapters:
(00:00) Building Bonde: a vetted professional community for women in their second and third career acts -
How do you grow your leadership team when you can't afford a full C-suite, your best people are buried in tactical work, and you have no idea whether they can actually think strategically? Cyndi runs The Metis Group and has spent 30 years turning fuzzy leadership development into something tangible and measurable.
Watch on YouTube
In our first conversation, she walked us through her Job Scorecard, a tool that quantifies what a role actually requires instead of hiding behind vague job descriptions. Once you know what the job is, how do you know whether the person in it has the cognitive horsepower to own outcomes, not just execute tasks?We unpacked the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, the TriMetrix assessment, and why most behavioral assessments (DISC, Culture Index, Predictive Index) only tell you half the story. If you're trying to figure out whether to elevate your controller into a CFO, promote your best salesperson into a sales leader, or just understand why your team keeps waiting for you to tell them what to do — this episode is a roadmap.
If you can't afford an off-the-shelf C-suite, then stop trying to buy one.Elevate internal talent instead of chasing expensive fractional magic bullets.The Job Scorecard is the foundation — quantify the role before you evaluate the person.Every leadership role needs separate buckets for oversight and talent management.Outsource the tactical to create space for strategic development.A 5-year valuation goal is non-negotiable; without it, your leaders are flying blind.The Watson-Glaser test quantifies critical thinking, and a raw score of 28+ is the magic number.Behavioral assessments tell you how someone communicates — not whether they can think.Strategic thinking has atrophied across all generations — and COVID made it worse.If someone says, "Just tell me what to do," that's a red flag — not a work style.
Top 10 Takeaways
Cyndi Gave is the founder of The Metis Group, a behavior-expert consultancy focused on getting the right people in the right seats — and getting extraordinary performance out of them. Celebrating 30 years in business in March 2025, Cyndi is a self-described "recovering HR person" who built her practice around tangible, process-driven tools that entrepreneurs actually have the patience to implement. Her specialties include the Job Scorecard, the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and the TriMetrix assessment — a three-part diagnostic that measures behaviors (DISC), motivators, and the Hartman Value Profile. Previously based in Michigan, Cyndi now operates out of Charlotte, North Carolina, and hosts a monthly leadership podcast through The Metis Group.
Chapters:
(00:00) Introduction of Cyndi Gave and the leadership development challenge(02:18) The Metis Group: 30 years making leadership tangible and measurable
(07:37) The demographic cliff and why internal talent development can't wait
(17:06) Can't afford a full C-suite? Stop trying to buy one
(29:00) Job scorecard: quantify the role before you evaluate the person
(44:00) Elevate internal talent: outsource tactical to make space for strategic
(47:00) "Just tell me what to do" is a red flag, not a work style
(01:00:41) Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test and the magic score of 28
(01:11:34) TriMetrix: behaviors, motivators, and the Hartman Value Profile
(01:20:55) Why using only one assessment...
- Laat meer zien
