Afleveringen
-
In episode 79 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Trump v Barbara. At issue in this case, whether the Trump administration's 2025 executive order exempting the children of illegal immigrants and temporary visitors from the Constitution's guarantee of birthright citizenship facially violates the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_new_5if6.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
0:00 Introduction/Syllabus
11:06 Justice Roberts, for the Court
49:52 Interjection
50:34 Justice Jackson, concurring
1:22:38 Justice Kavanaugh, concurring/dissenting
1:38:20 Justice Thomas, dissenting
3:56:29 Justice Alito, dissenting
4:58:33 Justice Gorsuch, dissenting
5:02:49 Opinions of the hosts
-
In episode 38 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Chevron USA v Plaquemines Parish. At issue in this case, whether Chevron's crude oil production in WWII was related to its federally contracted aviation gasoline refining for purposes of the federal officer removal statute, 28 U. S. C. §1442.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-813_3e04.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
0:00 Introduction/Syllabus
8:09 Justice Thomas, for the Court
28:52 Justice Alito took no part
28:56 Justice Jackson, concurring in the judgement
37:47 Opinion of the host
-
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
In episode 37 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's decision in Chiles v Salazar. At issue in this case, whether Colorado's 2019 ban on conversion therapy violated the First Amendment as applied to talk therapists.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539new_3fb4.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
0:00 Introduction/Syllabus
8:28 Justice Gorsuch, for the Court
44:14 Justice Kagan, concurring
49:42 Justice Jackson, dissenting
1:49:22 Opinions of the hosts
-
In episode 36 of the Supreme Court Opininos Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Rico v United States. At issue in this case, whether the Sentencing Reform Act authorizes the Ninth Circuit's rule automatically extending a term of supervised release during abscondment.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1056_qn12.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 35 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Cox Communications v Sony Music Entertainment. At issue in this case, whether Cox Communications, an Internet service provider, is secondarily liable for copyright infringement committed on Internet service connections it knew had been used for copyright infringement.
LInk to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_new_3dq3.pdf
LInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 34 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Zorn v Linton. At issue in this case, whether it was clearly established for qualified immunity purposes that officer Zorn's use of a rear wristlock on a passively resisting protestor was excessive force, in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Link to the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-297_bqm2.pdf
LInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 33 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Oliver v City Of Brandon. At issue in this case, whether the Heck bar applies where §1983 plaintiffs previously convicted under the laws they challenge seek purely prospective relief.
LInk to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/607us2r20_h315.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 32 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Urias-Orellana v Bondi. At issue in this case, whether federal courts should use substntial evidence review when hearing appeals of BIA determinations of prospective refugees' claimed persecution in their home countries.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/607us2r19_3e04.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 31 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Galette v New Jersey Transit Corporation. At issue in this case, whether the New Jersey Transit Corporation is an arm of the state of New Jersey and therefore shares in its sovereign immunity.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/607us2r18_d18f.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 30 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Mirabelli v Bonta. At issue in this case, whether to vacate the Ninth Circuit's stay of a district court injunction against California's policy prohibiting schools from informing parents about transgender behaviors exhibited by their children.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 29 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read Podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Villarreal v Texas. At issue in this case, whether the Sixth Amendment bars orders prohibiting criminal defendants from conferring with counsel about their ongoing testimony during overnight recesses interrupting said testimony.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-557_l5gm.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 28 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in GEO Group Inc. v Menocal. At issue in this case, whether a pre-trial order denying Yearsly protection is appealable immediately or only after trial.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-758_2dp3.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 27 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Hain Celestial Group v Palmquist. In this case, a suit brought in Texas state court against citizens of Texas and other states was removed to federal court. The distrcit court dismissed the Texas defendant, asserted diversity jursidiction over the suit, and rendered judgement in favor of the remaining defendant. The dismissal was found to be erroneous by the Fifth Circuit. The question before the Court then: did the lack of diversity jurisdiction at time of removal require vacature of the district court's judgement, or did the district court's erroneous dismissal cure that jurisdictional defect, allowing the judgement to stand?
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/607us2r14_1a72.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 26 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in United States Postal Service v Konan. At issue in this case, whether the postal exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act exempts claims arising out of postal employees' intentional nondelivery of mail from the government's waiver of sovereign immunity.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-351_7648.pdf
LInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 25 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Learning Resources v Trump. At issue in this case, whether the President can impose tariffs pursuant to a declared national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_new_3135.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 24 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Klein v Martin. At issue in this case, whether the Fourth Circuit erred in granting a state prisoner's federal habeas claim under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/607us1r11_7l48.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 23 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Berk v Choy. At issue in this case, whether Delaware's requirement that plaintiffs in medical malpractice suits submit expert affidavits of merit applies in federal court or is inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-440_1b82.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 22 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Ellinburg v United States. At issue in this case, whether the MVRA's restitution obligations are criminal punishments for purposed of the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the Constitution.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-482_d1oe.pdf
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 21 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited v Burton. At issue in this case, whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1)'s requirement that Rule 60(b) motions be brought in a reasonable time apply to motions seeking relief from allegedly void judgements.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-808_lkgn.pdf
LInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
-
In episode 20 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Barrett v United States. At issue in this case, whether a defendant can be convicted for the same offense under both Section 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and Section 924(j) under Blockburger v United States.
Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5774new_f20h.pdf
LInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
- Laat meer zien
