Afleveringen
-
The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order.
This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor.
(commercial at 7:14)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com) -
The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order.
This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor.
(commercial at 7:17)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com) -
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
Chad Daybell is a former gravedigger and author of apocalyptic novels. He gained notoriety in 2020 in connection with the deaths of his former wife, Tammy Daybell, and his new wife, Lori Vallow Daybell's two children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow. The case has received significant media attention due to its bizarre and complex nature.
Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow were both involved in a doomsday prepper group and shared similar religious beliefs. They married shortly after the deaths of both of their former spouses. The deaths of Tammy Daybell and the two children were initially considered unrelated, but suspicions arose when investigators discovered inconsistencies and strange behavior from Chad and Lori.
Tammy Daybell died in October 2019 under suspicious circumstances, initially attributed to natural causes. However, her body was exhumed after law enforcement began investigating the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Autopsy results have not been publicly released.
Tylee Ryan, 17, and JJ Vallow, 7, were reported missing in September 2019. Their disappearance sparked a nationwide search. Months later, their bodies were found buried on Chad Daybell's property in Salem, Idaho. Autopsies revealed that Tylee had been dismembered and burned, while JJ had been wrapped in plastic and duct tape.
Chad Daybell was arrested and charged with destruction, alteration, or concealment of evidence after the children's bodies were discovered on his property. Lori Vallow was also arrested and charged with multiple counts, including desertion and nonsupport of dependent children, obstruction, solicitation to commit a crime, and contempt of court.
In this episode recap what went down during day number 14 of the Chad Daybell trial.
(commercial at 12:47)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
LIVE UPDATES | Neighbors, insurance broker, teacher, medical examiner testify in Chad Daybell trial - East Idaho News -
Chad Daybell is a former gravedigger and author of apocalyptic novels. He gained notoriety in 2020 in connection with the deaths of his former wife, Tammy Daybell, and his new wife, Lori Vallow Daybell's two children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow. The case has received significant media attention due to its bizarre and complex nature.
Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow were both involved in a doomsday prepper group and shared similar religious beliefs. They married shortly after the deaths of both of their former spouses. The deaths of Tammy Daybell and the two children were initially considered unrelated, but suspicions arose when investigators discovered inconsistencies and strange behavior from Chad and Lori.
Tammy Daybell died in October 2019 under suspicious circumstances, initially attributed to natural causes. However, her body was exhumed after law enforcement began investigating the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Autopsy results have not been publicly released.
Tylee Ryan, 17, and JJ Vallow, 7, were reported missing in September 2019. Their disappearance sparked a nationwide search. Months later, their bodies were found buried on Chad Daybell's property in Salem, Idaho. Autopsies revealed that Tylee had been dismembered and burned, while JJ had been wrapped in plastic and duct tape.
Chad Daybell was arrested and charged with destruction, alteration, or concealment of evidence after the children's bodies were discovered on his property. Lori Vallow was also arrested and charged with multiple counts, including desertion and nonsupport of dependent children, obstruction, solicitation to commit a crime, and contempt of court.
In this episode recap what went down during day number 14 of the Chad Daybell trial.
(commercial at 7:22)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
LIVE UPDATES | Neighbors, insurance broker, teacher, medical examiner testify in Chad Daybell trial - East Idaho News -
Chad Daybell is a former gravedigger and author of apocalyptic novels. He gained notoriety in 2020 in connection with the deaths of his former wife, Tammy Daybell, and his new wife, Lori Vallow Daybell's two children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow. The case has received significant media attention due to its bizarre and complex nature.
Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow were both involved in a doomsday prepper group and shared similar religious beliefs. They married shortly after the deaths of both of their former spouses. The deaths of Tammy Daybell and the two children were initially considered unrelated, but suspicions arose when investigators discovered inconsistencies and strange behavior from Chad and Lori.
Tammy Daybell died in October 2019 under suspicious circumstances, initially attributed to natural causes. However, her body was exhumed after law enforcement began investigating the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Autopsy results have not been publicly released.
Tylee Ryan, 17, and JJ Vallow, 7, were reported missing in September 2019. Their disappearance sparked a nationwide search. Months later, their bodies were found buried on Chad Daybell's property in Salem, Idaho. Autopsies revealed that Tylee had been dismembered and burned, while JJ had been wrapped in plastic and duct tape.
Chad Daybell was arrested and charged with destruction, alteration, or concealment of evidence after the children's bodies were discovered on his property. Lori Vallow was also arrested and charged with multiple counts, including desertion and nonsupport of dependent children, obstruction, solicitation to commit a crime, and contempt of court.
In this episode recap what went down during day number 14 of the Chad Daybell trial.
(commercial at 7:22)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
LIVE UPDATES | Neighbors, insurance broker, teacher, medical examiner testify in Chad Daybell trial - East Idaho News -
The FBI has had many issues when it comes to internal behavior and proecdure not being followed, but two of the most egregious examples of the FBI's malfeasance are the Epstein disaster and the fact that they knew that Larry Nassar was abusing young girls and women. That last misstep is now costing the tax payers 137 million dollars and more is probably on the way.
In this episode, we hear from the attorney representing over two dozen Epstein survivors in their lawsuit against the FBI.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
DOJ settlement with Larry Nassar victims could benefit Epstein accusers | Fox News
-
Diddy has fired back at Joi Dickerson Neal and her allegations against him and in this episode, we are going to get a look at what Diddy had to say.
A "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" is a legal document filed by defendants in a lawsuit. Let's break down what each component means:
Memorandum of Law: This is a written legal document that presents arguments and supporting authorities (such as statutes, regulations, and case law) in support of a specific legal position. It is used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party presenting the memorandum.Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss: A motion to dismiss is a request made by one party in a lawsuit to terminate the case before it goes to trial. In this case, the defendants are asking the court to dismiss only certain parts of the complaint filed against them. This motion is "partial" because it seeks dismissal of only some claims or allegations, rather than the entire complaint.The Complaint: This refers to the initial document filed by the plaintiff(s) in a lawsuit, which outlines the claims and allegations against the defendant(s). The defendants' motion to dismiss is a response to the complaint, arguing that some or all of the claims in the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, such as failure to state a legal claim, lack of jurisdiction, or other deficiencies in the complaint.So, the "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" would be a document prepared by the defendants' legal team that lays out the legal arguments and authorities supporting their request to dismiss certain parts of the complaint. It would likely include analysis of relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to demonstrate why the court should grant their motion to dismiss.
(commercial at 8:14)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
diddy-motion.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
Diddy has fired back at Joi Dickerson Neal and her allegations against him and in this episode, we are going to get a look at what Diddy had to say.
A "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" is a legal document filed by defendants in a lawsuit. Let's break down what each component means:
Memorandum of Law: This is a written legal document that presents arguments and supporting authorities (such as statutes, regulations, and case law) in support of a specific legal position. It is used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party presenting the memorandum.Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss: A motion to dismiss is a request made by one party in a lawsuit to terminate the case before it goes to trial. In this case, the defendants are asking the court to dismiss only certain parts of the complaint filed against them. This motion is "partial" because it seeks dismissal of only some claims or allegations, rather than the entire complaint.The Complaint: This refers to the initial document filed by the plaintiff(s) in a lawsuit, which outlines the claims and allegations against the defendant(s). The defendants' motion to dismiss is a response to the complaint, arguing that some or all of the claims in the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, such as failure to state a legal claim, lack of jurisdiction, or other deficiencies in the complaint.So, the "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" would be a document prepared by the defendants' legal team that lays out the legal arguments and authorities supporting their request to dismiss certain parts of the complaint. It would likely include analysis of relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to demonstrate why the court should grant their motion to dismiss.
(commercial at 10:34)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
diddy-motion.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
The violence in Mexico has reached peak levels in Mexico as of late and the cartels and other criminal organizations continue to show little regard for the authorities or the government. In today's episode, we dive into the issue and discuss the utility workers who were recently targeted by cartels in Mexico.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-power-company-workers-were-killed-by-hired-killers/ar-AA11AgGw?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=bdb26826e56d410ba772c1db7fc93a8b -
In today's episode, we fire up the time machine and head back to 2011 where Prince Andrew was reportedly panicking about his relationship with Epstein and what it might mean for him and his position as Trade envoy. According to Ashkenazi at the time, Andrew was scared that he would love his gig. We also see how quick David Cameron and the English government was to jump to Prince Andrew's defense when the rumors began to swirl showing you just how far the enabling and protection for Prince Andrew went up the ladder.
(commercial at 11:35)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364248/Prince-Andrew-worried-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-abuse-case-lose-envoy-role.html -
Majorjon Kaylor, the man who is accused of executing his neighbors, attempted to have several counts against him tossed out. The Judge denied that request.
In this episode, we take a look at that order filed by the court and how it led to next domino in the Majorjon Kaylor case to fall.
(commercial at 10:47)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
121323-Order-re-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf (amazonaws.com) -
Gag orders, also known as prior restraint orders, are restrictions on speech or the press that are imposed by the government or the courts. The constitutionality of gag orders depends on the specific circumstances of each case and the specific restrictions imposed.In general, the First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press, and restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny by the courts.
However, under certain circumstances, the government may impose restrictions on speech in order to protect important interests, such as national security, the integrity of the judicial process, or the privacy rights of individuals.In such cases, the courts will balance the government's interests against the First Amendment rights of the speaker or the press. If the restrictions are deemed to be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of achieving the government's interest, they may be upheld as constitutional. However, if the restrictions are overly broad or unnecessarily restrictive, they may be struck down as unconstitutional.
In this episode we get the decision from the supreme court who has ruled that the gag order will stay in place.
(commercial at 7:22)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Idaho murders: Court denies request to lift gag order in case of Bryan Kohberger, man accused of killing 4 college students - CBS News -
In part one of this two part deep dive, we take a look at twelve of the biggest questions in the investigation into the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee and where the investigators are currently at in regards to each of the questions presented.
Let's dive in!
(commercial at 8:58)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Idaho murders: Key questions to solve what happened in university student slayings | The Independent -
In part one of this two part deep dive, we take a look at twelve of the biggest questions in the investigation into the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee and where the investigators are currently at in regards to each of the questions presented.
Let's dive in!
(commercial at 8:58)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Idaho murders: Key questions to solve what happened in university student slayings | The Independent -
P2P methamphetamine production involves the reduction of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine using red phosphorus and hydroiodic acid. The P2P method is different from the one-pot or shake-and-bake methods, which are also used to produce methamphetamine. In the P2P method, the reaction occurs in a separate vessel, whereas in the one-pot method, all the ingredients are mixed in a single container. This also produces a much stronger version of the drug and that makes it much harder to kick the addiction.
One of the states that has found itself dealing with a large number of people with addiction problems is Oregon and the toll that this new age methampethamine is taking is evident on not only the people but the community as well.
Let's dive in and see what's up!
(commercial at 8:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
OR drug crisis: Now in Oregon, cheaper meth 'rewires your brain,' more potent (koin.com) -
Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Mass. R. Crim. P. 17) outlines the procedures for subpoenas in criminal cases within the Massachusetts court system. Here's a detailed summary of its key provisions:
Authority and Purpose: Rule 17 derives its authority from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and is designed to facilitate the production of evidence and the summoning of witnesses in criminal proceedings.Issuance of Subpoenas: The rule allows for the issuance of subpoenas by the clerk of the court, a notary public, or any attorney authorized to practice law in Massachusetts. Subpoenas may be issued for the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or other tangible evidence.Form and Content: Subpoenas must be issued in writing and must command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony, or to produce specified documents or tangible things, at a specified time and place.Service of Subpoenas: Subpoenas may be served by any person who is not a party to the case and who is at least 18 years old. Service may be made by delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it, or by leaving a copy at their residence with a person of suitable age and discretion.Witness Fees and Mileage: Witnesses who comply with a subpoena are entitled to receive witness fees and mileage reimbursement as provided by law.Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoenas: Persons subject to subpoenas may seek protection from undue burden or harassment by filing a motion with the court. The court may quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive.Contempt for Failure to Obey Subpoena: Failure to obey a subpoena without reasonable excuse may result in a finding of contempt by the court. Contempt may be punished by fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.Service of Subpoenas Outside the Commonwealth: The rule provides procedures for the service of subpoenas outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Service of Subpoenas on Behalf of the Commonwealth: When the Commonwealth is the party seeking evidence or witnesses, subpoenas may be issued and served by any attorney authorized to represent the Commonwealth.Notice to Parties: The rule requires that notice of the issuance of a subpoena must be given to all parties in the case.Overall, Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 is designed to ensure the efficient and fair gathering of evidence and witness testimony in criminal cases, while also providing protections for individuals subject to subpoenas. It establishes clear procedures for the issuance, service, and enforcement of subpoenas within the Massachusetts court system.
As we continue to get prepared for the Karen Read trial that kicks off April 29th, we are now takign a look at the Commonwealth's memorandum in opposition to defendants motion pursusant to rule 17 of criminal precedure directed to Brian Albert, Verizon and AT&T.
(commercial at 7:10)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
PDF.COMMONWEALTH - Google Drive -
When a prosecutor seeks to limit the alibi of a suspect, it means they are attempting to challenge or restrict the evidence or testimony that supports the suspect's claim of innocence. An alibi is a defense strategy in which the accused asserts that they were somewhere else at the time the crime was committed, thus making it impossible for them to have committed the offense.Here's a breakdown of what it typically entails:
Investigation of the Alibi: The prosecutor may investigate the alibi thoroughly to determine its validity. This may involve interviewing witnesses, examining physical evidence, reviewing surveillance footage, or obtaining records that could corroborate or refute the alibi.Challenging the Alibi: If the prosecutor believes the alibi is weak or fabricated, they may seek to challenge it during the trial. This could involve presenting contradictory evidence, questioning the credibility of alibi witnesses, or arguing that the suspect had the opportunity to commit the crime despite the alibi.Motion to Limit or Exclude Alibi Evidence: In some cases, the prosecutor may file a motion to limit or exclude certain aspects of the alibi evidence from being presented in court. This could be based on legal grounds such as relevance, reliability, or procedural rules. For example, if the alibi witness has a history of dishonesty or bias, the prosecutor may argue that their testimony should be excluded.Pretrial Hearing: The judge may hold a pretrial hearing to consider the prosecutor's motion to limit the alibi evidence. Both the defense and the prosecution would have the opportunity to present arguments and evidence supporting their positions.Ruling by the Judge: The judge will make a decision based on the arguments presented and applicable legal standards. If the judge grants the prosecutor's motion, certain aspects of the alibi evidence may be restricted or excluded from the trial. If the motion is denied, the defense will be allowed to present the alibi evidence to the jury.
In this episode, we head back up to Idaho to check in on the Bryan Kohberger trial and the battle over his alibi that continues to rage inside of the courtroom.
(commercial at 8:41)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Attorneys in Idaho student homicides argue for pretrial wins | Idaho Statesman -
On January 29, 2022, Boston police officer John O'Keefe was found dead outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts. He had been dropped off by his girlfriend, Karen A. Read, to attend a gathering hosted by another police officer, Brian Albert. O'Keefe was discovered hours later and transported to a local hospital where the cause of death was determined to be blunt force trauma and hypothermia.
Following the incident, police arrested Read on February 1, alleging that she hit O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow. Subsequently, Read was indicted on charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a collision. Read has denied hitting O'Keefe and claimed that she was framed by the police.
In this episode, we recap what went down during day number two of the trial.
(commercial at 9:35)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Karen Read lawyers cross-examine Canton police officers on day 2 of testimony - masslive.com -
Victoria's secret and their branding was impossible to miss in the early 2000s. It was everywhere. TV, magazines on the radio and most importantly in our malls. That was where the real action was taking place for Victoria's Secret and they parlayed the popularity into a line of clothing targeted directly to tweens and teens. The problem? The degenerates in the boardroom who were making these decisions to target young girls with their marketing campaign, were also paling around with Jeffrey Epstein.
(commercial at 11:45)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/internal-videos-reveal-how-victorias-secret-targeted-teens?ref=scroll -
The circus tent continues to grow down in Delphi as the prosecutors and the defense continue lobbing accusations back and forth at each other, with the latest salvo coming from the prosecutors who have asked the judge to keep the Odinite theory out of the court room, saying that it has no merit and that it's nothing more than a tactic being used by the defense to muddy the waters.
The defense on the other hand says that they have evidence of this theory and that they can prove that Richard Allen isn't the killer and that serious issues remain with the Richard Allen's arrest and with what they say is a blatant violation of Richard Allen's 4th amendment rights.
The trial is slated to kick off on May 13th.
(commercial at 8:05)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Delphi murders: Prosecutor wants Odinism left out of Allen trial (indystar.com) - Laat meer zien