Afleveringen
-
First, the plaintiff claims the defendant's dog attacked hers, so she's suing for vet bills. The defendant feels bad about what happened, but the plaintiff's dog wasn't leashed at the time.
Then, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. The plaintiff claims the defendant threw out his clothes and PlayStation, so he's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff was a freeloader who never paid rent when they lived together. She tossed his stuff out because she couldn't stand to see it. The defendant believes they're even because of all the money the defendant owes her.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff paid to rent the defendant's cosmetology license so she could open a beauty bar. The defendant was supposed to register her business, but she didn't, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims she was offered a manager position at the plaintiff's shop, but it never happened because the plaintiff didn't have her business properly registered. The defendant is countersuing for lost wages
Then, the plaintiff brings her former tenant to court for an unpaid water bill she's suing him for. The defendant admits he was struggling financially at the time, but the plaintiff already took the water bill out of his security, so he doesn't owe her. The defendant is countersuing for the remaining balance on his security deposit.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
The plaintiff took his car to the defendant's repair shop for new tires. The rear tire flew off shortly after, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff requested rims that were too big for his vehicle, so the defendant doesn't feel he's responsible for the damages.
The plaintiff claims the defendant illegally towed his vehicle, and he's suing for the value of the car. The defendant says he was called by the plaintiff's leasing office because the vehicle was parked in someone else's spot. Unfortunately, the car was sent to auction because the plaintiff didn't pay the fee to get it out, but that's not the defendant's fault.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff hired the defendant to install some new carpeting in his house. The plaintiff asked for some free leftover carpet to create some mats, but when he went to pick it up, the defendant charged him. The plaintiff also claims the carpeting has faded, so he's suing. The defendant argues it took him a lot of money and time to find the leftover carpet pieces. Additionally, the defendant insists the carpeting is not faded, and this lawsuit is meritless.
The plaintiff loaned the defendant money to pay rent, but he hasn't yet paid it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the loan was a gift, and the plaintiff is only turning it into a loan because he's obsessed with him or something. The defendant is countersuing for lost work.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff built two composting receptacles on the defendant's property. However, the defendant failed to pay the plaintiff and threw away some of his tools, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff built the composting receptacles for the community and just used her property as a storage area. The defendant is countersuing for the cost to fix the damages to the side of her house.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff secured a rental van on her credit card for the defendant, her cousin, when they were on vacation. The defendant failed to pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the trip was a disaster because the plaintiff invited a strange man and caused damage to the rental car. The defendant insists the plaintiff is just trying to tack on the costs to her.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff was picking someone up at the airport when the defendant crashed into his car. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues she looked before pulling out and as she did, the plaintiff changed lanes without warning and cut her off. The defendant is countersuing for lost wages.
Then, the plaintiff is an Uber driver, and the defendant arranged for a pickup. The plaintiff claims the defendant smashed his door into a metal garbage can, damaging it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff refused to take him to his destination. When he got out of the car, the defendant gently opened the door. The defendant admits he lightly scratched the door but nothing more. The defendant is countersuing for counseling and lost wages.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff met the defendant on a dating app. He claims he loaned her money for car insurance, but the defendant failed to pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff offered her the loan as a gift.
Then, the plaintiff paid the defendant, a contractor, money to buy materials for a construction job, but he quit and took off with the money. The plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant argues he did all the demo work, but the plaintiff never paid him for his services, only the materials.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff brings her son into court because she bought him a car with the agreement he'd make payments. Unfortunately, the plaintiff says her son failed to put up the money, so she's suing. The defendant argues he shared the vehicle with his mother, but she never let him drive it, so he denies owing.
The plaintiff sold furniture to the defendant, but she failed to pay in full. The plaintiff is suing for the remaining balance. The defendant insists she paid for all the belongings she agreed to buy.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff brings his ex-wife to court because he claims she owes him money for a washer and dryer, as well as a dresser. The plaintiff claims all of the belongings in question are hers. The defendant is countersuing for harassment and lost wages.
The plaintiff brings his friend to court because he claims she owes him money for a loan. The defendant says the money the plaintiff gave her was for an apartment he was going to move into after he was released from jail. The defendant is countersuing for an ounce of marijuana she paid for but never received.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff hired the defendant, a fashion designer, to create an outfit for her birthday party. When she received the outfit, the plaintiff was not happy and had to cancel her photo shoot, so she's suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff is just super picky, and he even made her two different outfits. Nothing would have made her happy, according to the defendant
The plaintiff was driving her car when the defendant ran into her, causing damages. The plaintiff says the defendant doesn't have insurance, and she's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff caused the accident, not her.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, The plaintiff alleges the defendants — her ex-husband and his new wife — stole her son's cell phone and destroyed it with a hammer, so she's suing. The defendants say the son in question isn't allowed to have access to the phone. Besides, they accidentally ran over the phone — they didn't destroy it on purpose.
Then, the plaintiff brings her nephew to court because she gave him a loan to fix his car and buy a phone. However, the plaintiff's nephew hasn't yet paid back the money, so she's suing. The defendant claims he repaired the plaintiff's car for free, so he believes they're even.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff had to board her dog at the defendant's facility. While there, the plaintiff's dog was bitten, and she didn't even find out until she picked up her pet. The plaintiff is suing the defendant for vet bills. The defendant argues the plaintiff's dog tried to steal food from another. The defendant checked the dog and didn't notice any serious injuries.
The plaintiff hired the defendant to cater her birthday party. The food she tasted before the party was not the same quality as the food he served. The plaintiff is suing for a refund because her party was ruined as a result. The defendant says he was cooking the food when he received a call from a store saying the chicken was recalled. The defendant scrambled and had to find new chicken at the last minute. Besides, the defendant believes he provided great food and denies owing.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to create custom T-shirts. When the plaintiff received the merchandise, he claims the printing was off and the sizes were wrong, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant says the plaintiff wanted the shirts rushed, and the defendant did the best he could under the circumstances. Besides, the defendant told the plaintiff he doesn't give refunds.
Then the plaintiff is suing the defendant because he claims he owes him a commission for a vinyl record sale he helped with. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn't earn his commission, so he owes nothing.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff prepaid the defendant for landscaping services, but the plaintiff changed his mind and hired someone else. The defendant said he would give him the refund, but he didn't, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff went behind his back and hired some of his employees. The defendant also claims he returned the money minus the work and costs, so he doesn't believe he owes any more cash
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiffs rented an apartment from the defendant. They had to move out due to a bug problem. However, the defendant is illegally withholding their security, so the plaintiffs are suing. The defendant insists the plaintiffs caused the cockroach infestation in addition to damaging the place. The defendant is countersuing for additional repairs needed.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff claims his daughter and her husband owe him money for an unpaid loan to help them pay rent, so he's suing. The defendants argue the plaintiff said they didn't have to pay back the loan.
Then, the plaintiff pawned a valuable gold coin and necklace at the defendant's shop. The guy sold the plaintiff's stuff without permission, so he's suing. The defendant argues he gave the plaintiff the proper notice, so he denies owing a dime.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff used to be great friends with the defendant, and they purchased a boat together. However, the defendant sold the boat at a huge profit and refuses to give the plaintiff his fair share, so he's suing. The defendant insists he bought the plaintiff out of his share of the boat before selling it.
Then, the plaintiff brings her cousin, the defendant, to court because she owes her money for flights she booked. The defendant had to back out of the trip last minute because she refused to get a vaccine, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the trip was meant to be a gift. Besides, the defendant claims the plaintiff canceled on her.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiffs are a father and son. The son rented an apartment from the defendant, but the defendant had a problem with the plaintiff’s pet ferret. He had to move out, so he’s suing for the cost of the security deposit and a listing fee. The defendant argues the plaintiff never told him about the ferret and he had an allergic reaction to it. He says the animal stunk up their apartment.
Then, the plaintiff brought her car to the defendants’ shop, and they did a terrible job. She says they never painted the roof and left drip marks on it. She’s suing for the cost of repainting the vehicle. The defendants argue they didn’t redo the roof because there weren’t any dents, so there wasn’t anything to fix. They claim they did everything they could to make the plaintiff happy, but she just wasn’t having it. They’re countersuing for unpaid work.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to move a piano out of her house. She says the defendant’s workers damaged her door and porch while moving it, so she’s suing for damages. The defendant admits he hit the piano on the door, but there’s no proof of the porch. He doesn’t think he owes her because she’s suing so many months after it happened.
Then. the plaintiff’s kitchen flooded due to a clogged pipe and damaged the place. He claims the flood was a larger problem with the condo and not something specific with his unit. He had to clean up the mess, so he’s suing for legal and cleaning fees. The defendant argues the plaintiff caused the pipe damage, so the condo board doesn’t need to pay.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices - Laat meer zien
