Afleveringen
-
This week is part 2 of our round-up where we bang through a bumper collection of clangers. Last time we spoke about âsuper specific requestsâ and this week weâre onto the âfrustratingly vagueâ ones:
âI need it to be elegance and classyââkeep everything from my example but also do it differentlyââJazz it upââJust play around with itââI like blue/red/green (there are endless types and shades or each colour)ââJust a quick task for youâŠâ -
Season 1 of âWell, youâre the designerâ is nearing the end. To round things off, we've swept up all the leftover morsels into an appetising two-part buffet of baffling briefs and frustrating feedback. Weâve split the resulting smörgĂ„sbord into âsuper specificâ and âfrustratingly vague.â This week itâs the turn of the âsuper specificâ requests, so weâre discussing:
âPlease include this small pointless mapââReplace this picture with one of the opposite orientationââUse this terrible font combinationââBullet points onlyââUse my grotty, badly-framed images over good quality stock photosââUse the international phone number formatâListen to the end to see how Matt and Rich score each client clanger. -
Zijn er afleveringen die ontbreken?
-
To the untrained eye, empty space around text and graphics can feel like unused real estate, or a missed opportunity to make everything bigger. But empty space is not wasted space. It can be an effective means to highlight a strong message by allowing the eye to identify it quickly and dwell on its meaning. Our designers explain how giving each element room to breathe can create a greater impact than packing the page with content.
-
Whatâs worse than a client who doesnât know what they want? A client who knows exactly what they want because itâs already been done! This week, weâre investigating the line between influence and infringement.
-
A clientâs website is their castle. They use it to store everything they might think of as a brand asset. So when it comes to designing something new, all the building blocks are there, right? Well, most often theyâre not. Content must be appropriate to the medium, whether thatâs the size, orientation and format of images, or the brevity and intent of the copy. We look at why it can be unhelpful for everyone involved to âsee website for details.â
-
Design by committee. Every designer's nightmare. Collaboration is cool but excessive input can dilute strong ideas and imperil the process. So why are clients still enlisting the aid of partners, parents and pets in their decision making? Our designers discuss how to navigate the dinghy of design when everyone's sticking their oar in.
-
What do we think of the design, guys? Everyoneâs input is valuable. No wrong answers. âMake it pop!â you say⊠What does this oft-spouted piece of vagueness actually mean? Is it even possible to pop amid an all-out war for our attention, where weâre constantly popped at from all angles?
-
Grab a photo. Fade it out so itâs no longer impactful, but leave just enough detail to interfere with the text. Centre-justify the text so itâs basically an assault course for your eyes. The classics are classic for a reason, except when theyâre horrible. Turns out this is a commonly requested design. Who knew?
Brought to you by solopress.com - print delivered tomorrow. -
Requesting multiple designs might sound like a great way to get some different options to ponder over. Thatâs until things get out of hand. The boys trade anecdotes about how analysis paralysis ruined a couple of brands before they even had a chance to trade.
Brought to you by solopress.com - print delivered tomorrow. -
Massive logo - no brainer, right? Everyone wants to push their brand to the fore, and a prominent logo seems like a quick win. So why are graphic designers reluctant to comply? We have a look at the consequences, both aesthetic and commercial, of going large with the logo.
Brought to you by solopress.com - print delivered tomorrow.